Saturday, 13 July 2013

Australia spies for the FBI

As is to be expected, there is more about this in the foreign media than in Australia. After trying to google I have to conclude this went unreported in neighboring NZ.


Australia’s largest telco

stored data for FBI

Telstra, Australia’s largest phone company, stored emails and phone calls to be handed over to US intelligence upon request, according to an agreement it signed in 2001 with the FBI and US Department of Justice.




RT,
12 July, 2013

The copy of the 12-year-old agreement, which was posted online on Friday by news website Crikey, is in confirmation of this week’s earlier leak by Edward Snowden, revealing that large amounts of communication data sent around the world via undersea cables could be intercepted by the US, based on the agreements federal agents signed with foreign corporations.

According to the leaked document, undersea cabling company Reach – a joint venture of Telstra (then 50.1 percent-owned by the Australian Government) and PCCW, a Hong Kong corporation – had to send all communications to or from US to a storage facility “
physically located in the United States, from which Electronic Surveillance can be conducted pursuant to Lawful US Process.” The document also specifies the facility should be run exclusively by US staff.

The US demanded the ability to have access to all emails and phone calls between the US and other countries, meaning foreign citizens also had their data landing in America. Apart from the content of communications, Reach was supposed to supply call associated data, subscriber information and billing records.

Those were to be stored on American soil for no less than two years.

The Australian Greens Party has called on Telstra to “
immediately disclose details” of the deal, which allowed “the FBI and US Department of Justice to monitor calls and data traffic via the company's undersea cables,” according to the party’s website.

This is an extraordinary breach of trust, invasion of privacy, and erosion of Australia’s sovereignty,” Greens Party Senator Scott Ludlam said.

Telstra has meanwhile issued a statement justifying the deal.

"
This agreement, at that time 12 years ago, reflected Reach's operating obligations in the US that require carriers to comply with US domestic law," the statement says.

The disclosure of the deal between the Australian telco and the US intelligence comes in the wake of Edward Snowden’s disclosures detailing a top-secret 
NSA surveillance program.

The White House continues to justify the practices as legally-authorized amid mounting criticism from the public and politicians. Snowden is seeking asylum to avoid prosecution in the US, where he is accused under the Espionage Act. 





Telstra signed deal that would have allowed US spying
Australian company agreed to allow US government to store information on communications between US and 
other countries



2 July, 2013

Telstra agreed to store information on communications between America and other countries in a contract with the US government which meant it could potentially spy on the contents.

The agreement was signed in 2001 between the telecommunications company – which was at the time half-owned by the Australian government – and its subsidiary Reach, as well as the FBI and the US Department of Justice (DOJ).

The agreement, first reported by Crikey who obtained the documents, gave the US government permission to store "domestic communications" – with the possibility of using them for spying – using the underwater cables owned by Reach.

Domestic communications were defined in the agreement as communications within the US but could also extend to communications which "originate or terminate" in America, meaning Australian communications with America could have potentially been subject to the agreement.

Telstra also agreed to report to the US government every three months on whether any foreign non-government entities had asked for access to their communications, and complete a compliance report every year which could not be accessed using freedom of information laws.

"Domestic communications companies shall designate points of contact within the United States with the authority and responsibility for accepting and overseeing the carrying out of lawful US process to conduct electronic surveillance of or relating to domestic communications carried by or through domestic communications infrastructure; or relating to customers or subscribers of domestic communications companies," the agreement says.

The points of contact were to be American citizens and the agreement also stopped Telstra and Reach, which is based in Hong Kong, from complying with any country's laws that certain data should be destroyed.

"Reach, Tesltra and PCCW agree that the United States would suffer irreparable injury if for any reason a domestic communications company failed to perform any of its significant responsibilities under this agreement and that monetary relief would not be an adequate remedy," the agreement said.

"The FBI and the DOJ shall be entitled, in addition to any other remedy available at law or equity, to specific performance and injunctive or other equitable relief."

The agreement meant all communications within America using the cables was stored in a facility on US soil which was staffed solely by Americans who passed security clearances.

A spokesperson for Telstra said the agreement was complying with American law.

"This agreement, at that time 12 years ago, reflected Reach's operating obligations in the US that require carriers to comply with US domestic law," he said.

The revelations are the latest in a series about government spying which began with the Guardian reporting a secret agreement between various companies and the US National Security Agency.

Earlier this week the Washington Post reported on the existence of agreements with the US and telecommunications companies which gave the government access to cables for spying.

Many of the agreements have since been published on the website Public Intelligence.

Telstra sells Australia out to 

US intelligence


Statement by the Pirate Party Australia

Following revelations that in 2001 telecommunications giant Telstra signed a deal to give the FBI and US Department of Justice surveillance access to monitor submarine cables linking Australia to the United States, Pirate Party Australia demands greater protections of privacy and data sovereignty for our nations’ citizens.

According to the documents released, call data, subscriber information and IP addresses are collected for all voice and data traffic traversing the US[1].

If what the media is saying is true, why is an Australian company colluding with the United States Government to spy on Internet traffic of Australians citizens? This is entirely unacceptable and must stop immediately,” said Brendan Molloy, Lead Candidate for the Senate in NSW.

The Government must answer why they have been complicit in the spying on of Australian citizens, as this began when Telstra was still partially Government owned.”

Recently there has been a plethora of scandals relating to the overreach of United States’ surveillance programs which have targeted not just citizens of the United States’ but also of its allies[2]. This is the last in an ever growing parade of covert privacy intrusions, blanket surveillance and breaches of confidence.

Telstra is no stranger to breaching the confidence of its customers, and incidentally breaching basic human rights[3] and Australian law[4], by retaining and giving the United States control over their data. in June last year Telstra secretly transmitted parts of its subscribers’ Internet history for processing in the US, potentially making those records subject to foreign, highly intrusive laws such as the PATRIOT Act without their knowledge. The previous activity was done for commercial reasons[5].

Pirate Party Australia is committed to the protection of privacy and the increased transparency of surveillance schemes. The Party has criticised blanket surveillance schemes as unnecessary impingements on personal privacy.




No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.