Assange
Indictment By DOJ May Trigger Extradition To US, According To "Recent
Developments"
15
November, 2018
The
US Justice Department is preparing to indict WikiLeaks founder Julian
Assange which, after sensitive international negotiations, would
likely trigger his extradition to the United States to stand trial,
according to the Wall
Street Journal, citing
people in Washington familiar with the matter.
Over the past year, U.S. prosecutors have discussed several types of charges they could potentially bring against Mr. Assange, the people said. Mr. Assange has lived in the Ecuadorean embassy in London since receiving political asylum from the South American country in 2012.
The people familiar with the case wouldn’t describe whether discussions were under way with the U.K. or Ecuador about Mr. Assange, but said they were encouraged by recent developments.
...
The exact charges Justice Department might pursue remain unclear, but they may involve the Espionage Act, which criminalizes the disclosure of national defense-related information. -WSJ
In
short, the DOJ doesn't appear to have a clear charge against
Assange yet. Then
there's the optics of dragging Assange out of Ecuador's London
Embassy and into the United States, then prosecuting him, and if
successful - jailing him.
"Prosecuting
someone for publishing truthful information would set a terrible and
dangerous precedent,"
said Assange lawyer Barry Pollack - who says he hasn't heard anything
about a US prosecution.
"We
have heard nothing from authorities suggesting that a criminal case
against Mr. Assange is imminent," he added.
Moreover,
assuming that even if the DOJ could mount a case, they
would be required to prove that
Russia was the source of
a trove of emails damaging to Hillary Clinton that WikiLeaks released
in the last few months of the 2016 election.
An indictment from special counsel Robert Mueller that portrayed WikiLeaks as a tool of Russian intelligence for releasing thousands of hacked Democratic emails during the 2016 presidential campaign has made it more difficult for Mr. Assange to mount a defense as a journalist. Public opinion of Mr. Assange in the U.S. has dropped since the campaign.
Prosecutors have considered publicly indicting Mr. Assange to try to trigger his removal from the embassy, the people said, because a detailed explanation of the evidence against Mr. Assange could give Ecuadorean authorities a reason to turn him over. -WSJ
It's
no secret that Assange and Hillary Clinton aren't exactly exchanging
Christmas cards, however would WikiLeaks' release of damaging
information that was hacked (or copied locally on a thumb drive by a
well-meaning American), be illegal for Assange as a publisher?
Despite
scant clues as to how the DOJ will prosecute Assange aside
from rumors that it has to do with the Espionage Act, the US
Government is cooking on something.
John Demers - head of the DOJ's national security division, said last
week regarding an Assange case: "On
that, I'll just say, we'll see."
The U.S. hasn’t publicly commented on whether it has made, or plans to make, any extradition request. Any extradition request from the U.S. would likely go to British authorities, who have an outstanding arrest warrant for Mr. Assange related to a Swedish sexual assault case. Sweden has since dropped the probe, but the arrest warrant stands.
Any extradition and prosecution would involve multiple sensitive negotiations within the U.S. government and with other countries. -WSJ
Beginning in 2010, the
Department of Justice beginning under the Obama administration has
drawn a distinction between WikiLeaks and other news organizations -
with former Attorney General Eric Holder insisting that Assange's
organization does
not deserve the same first amendment protections during
the Chelsea Manning case in which the former Army intelligence
analyst was found guilty at a court-martial of leaking thousands of
classified Afghan War Reports.
US
officials have given mixed messages over Assange, with President
Trump having said during the 2016 election "I love
WikiLeaks," only to have his former CIA Director, Mike Pompeo
label WikiLeaks akin to a foreign "hostile intelligence service"
and a US adversary. Former Attorney General Jeff Sessions has said
that Assange's arrest is a "priority."
Ecuador's
relationship with Assange, meanwhile, has deteriorated considerably
with the election of President Lenin Moreno - who called the
WikiLeaks founder a "stone in our shoe," adding that
Assange's stay at the London embassy is unsustainable.
Ecuador has been looking to improve relations with the U.S., hosting Vice President Mike Pence in 2018 amid interest in increasing trade.
Ecuador’s Foreign Relations Ministry declined to comment. This month, Foreign Relations Minister José Valencia told a radio station the government hadn’t received an extradition request for Mr. Assange.
Mr. Assange has clashed with his Ecuadorean hosts in over internet access, visitors, his cat and other issues. Last month, he sued Ecuador over the conditions of his confinement. At a hearing last month, at which a judge rejected Mr. Assange’s claims, Mr. Assange said he expected to be forced out of the embassy soon. -WSJ
Assange
and Ecuador seem to have worked things out for the time being; with
his months-long communication blackout mostly lifted (with strict
rules against Assange participating in political activities that
would affect Ecuador's international relations). Assange is now
allowed Wi-Fi, but has to foot the bill for his own phone calls and
other communication.
In
October, a judge threw out a lawsuit Assange filed against Ecuador
from implementing the stricter rules,.
"Ecuador
hasn’t violated the rights of anyone," Attorney General Íñigo
Salvador said after the court ruling. "It has provided asylum to
Mr. Assange, and he should comply with the rules to live harmoniously
inside Ecuador’s public installations in London.
Assange's
attorneys say he will appeal the ruling - however it may be a moot
point if he's dragged into a US courtroom sooner than later.
SCOOP: US Department of Justice "accidentally" reveals existence of sealed charges (or a draft for them) against WikiLeaks' publisher Julian Assange in apparent cut-and-paste error in an unrelated case also at the Eastern District of Virginia. https://pacer-documents.s3.amazonaws.com/179/399086/18919235200.pdf …
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.