Jim Kunstler: As Midterms Fade, The 'Real' Russiagate Rises
9
November, 2018
Postmortem
And
so, with the midterm election in the rearview mirror, behold the rush
into the next phase of Civil War 2. The
Golden Golem of Greatness (aka, President Trump) finally requested
the resignation of the feckless Attorney General, Mr. Sessions - a
fine point as we shall see. The
New York Times,
of course, played it as an opportunity to litigate the constitution
in their headline the day after:
Jeff Sessions Is Forced Out as Attorney General as Trump Installs Loyalist
WASHINGTON — President Trump fired Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Wednesday, replacing him with a loyalist who has echoed the president’s complaints about the special counsel investigation into Russia’s election interference and will now take charge of the inquiry.
Notice
that in the headline and the lede The
Times is
trying to establish the legalistic meme that Sessions was fired
rather than resigned, hoping to trigger an obscure DOJ rule that a
fired AG cannot be replaced by a temporary appointment. (Well,
Mr. Sessions did sign a letter of resignation stating that…uh…
he resigned.)
At the same time, The
Times tries
to establish that the incoming Acting AG, Matthew G. Whitaker, is too
biased to serve, setting the table for a constitutional food fight.
Of
course The
New York Times is
no longer a newspaper in the traditional sense, but an advocacy and
propaganda arm of the Democratic Party. They’re
pushing this desperate gambit because it’s clear that Mr. Trump is
taking the gloves off now in this long-running battle. What’s
actually at stake is whether the DOJ will prosecute the actual and
obvious collusion that occurred during and after the 2016 election -
namely, the
misconduct of the highest DOJ and FBI officials in collusion with the
Hillary Clinton campaign to cook up the bogus Russia-gate case, and
the subsequent scramble to cover up their activities when Mrs.
Clinton lost the election and they realized the evidence trail of
this felonious activity would not be shoved down the memory hole by
Clinton appointees.
Add caption |
The
result has been two years with no evidence of Trump-Russia collusion
and two years of DOJ / FBI stonewalling over the release of pertinent
documents in the matter. There
is already an established and certified evidence trail indicating
that James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, Bruce and Nellie Ohr,
Lisa Page, and others (including former CIA Director John Brennan and
former DNI James Clapper) acted illegally in politicizing their
offices. Some of these figures have been subject to criminal
referrals by the DOJ Inspector General, Mr. Horowitz. Some
of them are liable to further criminal investigation Many of them
have been singing to grand juries out of the news spotlight.
Whether
Mr. Whitaker remains in his new role, or is replaced soon by a
permanent AG confirmed by the Senate, the momentum has clearly
shifted. The
Democrats, and especially the forces still aligned with Hillary, are
running scared all of a sudden. Thus,
all the bluster coming from party hacks such as Rep. Jerrold Nadler
(D-NY 10th Dist), and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer
(D-NY). Mr. Nadler takes the gavel of the House Judiciary Committee
in January and is promising a three-ring circus of investigations
when he does. If
the House moves to a quixotic impeachment effort, they will find that
to be a dangerous two-way street, since Mr. Trump’s legal team can
also introduce testimony in his defense that will embarrass and
incriminate the Democrats. Anyway,
the Senate is extremely unlikely to convict Mr. Trump in a trial.
Mr.
Mueller is said to be writing his final report on Russia-gate. One
might adduce that he did not turn up anything significant, since, if
he had discovered treasonous collusion between the Trump campaign and
Russia, it would have merited public action by now.
You can’t uncover something like that and not act on it for more
than a year. More mysterious, though, is whether Mr. Mueller even
bothered to look into the well-documented misdeeds of the officials
cited above. How could he not? If he failed to do so, would he not
appear to be himself involved in the cover-up of their activities?
The Inspector General‘s report would be sufficient to alert him.
There
is a lot to get to the bottom of in all this: the
mis-use of FISA court warrants, the outsourcing of US intel
activities to Britain’s MI6 intel agency to spy on US citizens, the
role of Hillary Clinton and her campaign with FBI and DOJ officials
in providing so-called opposition research used to provoke
spying operations on Mr. Trump and his associates, and to confound
the performance of his duties in office. And
much more.
Readers
seem perplexed as to why I keep writing about Russia-gate. It
should be self-evident that an attempt by the party then in power to
use federal agencies to interfere in a presidential election is
serious business in the highest degree.
It is corrosive of the rule-of-law and the fate of the nation, and
attention must be paid
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.