Migrant
Caravan Plans To Push Toward Mexico's Capital
Dahboo 777
A
big group of Central Americans has agreed to push toward Mexico City
from a coastal state Monday, planning to exit a part of the country
that has long been treacherous for migrants seeking to get to the
United States.
In
a thundering voice vote Sunday night at a gymnasium in Cordoba, about
1,000 members of a migrant caravan that has been moving northward
through Mexico voted to try to get to the capital Monday by walking
and hitching rides. Cordoba is 178 miles from the capital by the
shortest route, which would be the group's longest single-day journey
yet since they began more than three weeks ago.
Is there really a 'militia caravan’ traveling south to protect US border from marching migrants?
RT,
5
November, 2018
Most
media outlets have published as fact claims that vigilante groups
incited by Donald Trump are organizing themselves to confront the
migrant caravan, but the story appears to be based on little more
than an unverified boast.
Variously
named as “armed
militias” and “far
right activists,” some “gun-toting” groups
have been reported as “forming
their own caravan” in scores
of media reports over the weekend, from the Huffington
Post to
The Hill in
the US to international outlets such as the UK’s the Sun,
Turkey’s Anadolu,
and Russia’s Sputnik.
The
vigilantes are reportedly equipped with military-level tech, and will
form units hundreds-strong. They have caused alarm among both local
residents – afraid that their land will be invaded– and the army
contingent forced to separate sides.
Twitter
luminaries have circulated dire warnings of bloodshed and calls to
curb “domestic
terrorism.”
A single source
But
with the 4,000-strong immigrant caravan still days away from the
border, which remains relatively quiet for the moment, how are these
minutemen’s plans known in advance?
Every
single one of these stories primarily cites a Washington Post
investigative report published
on Saturday, which speaks of militias “packing
coolers and tents, oiling rifles and tuning up aerial drones, with
plans to form caravans of their own and trail American troops to the
border.”
This
information is sourced from “Shannon McGauley, a bail bondsman
in the Dallas suburbs who is president of the Texas Minutemen,” a
civilian border guard group.
McGauley
says that 100 volunteers are “en-route
to the Rio Grande” and
more are coming.
“My
phone’s been ringing nonstop for the last seven days. You got other
militias, and husbands and wives, people coming from Oregon, Indiana.
We’ve even got two from Canada,” brags
McGauley, whose group on Facebook numbers 700 members.
The
Washington Post does not ask him to verify his claims, while
the top border official in the Rio Grande region, Manuel Padilla Jr,
tells the newspaper that they “don’t have
any specific information about the militias.”
In
fact, further down the article, Michael Vickers, a local rancher who
himself intercepts and reports migrants crossing his lands, calls the
traveling vigilantes “a
bunch of guys with a big mouth and no substance to them.
But
surely the world’s media wouldn’t concoct a story of a
countrywide gathering of extremists based of the words of one man
with 1,700 Twitter followers, who refers to himself online by his
callsign N5KOU.
Indeed,
this is not the first story about the militia; that was the
Associated Press report on
October 27. The main source in the article: Shannon McGauley
(“They’re
just laughing in our face. It’s a free-for-all in America,” says
the loquacious border defender there.)
McGauley
isn’t standing up for his homeland alone. Indeed there is mention
of one other name there: “Monica
Marin, an Oregon resident, said she has raised about $4,000 online to
help militias buy supplies.”Perhaps
she is kitting out the drones.
Otherwise
the only numbers mentioned anywhere are “a
small band of men with the Patriots of the Constitution
militia” who arrived in
the New Mexico village of Columbus, and an “estimated
200 unregulated armed militia members currently operating along the
southwest border," highlighted in
leaked Army documents from October detailing its response plan to the
caravan. While some articles enlisted these 200 among the arrivals,
there is nothing that suggests that these aren’t just regular
border vigilantes, who would be hanging around entry points whether
the Central American caravan made it or not.
Partisanship vs. Ethics
And
that’s it. This is not to say that there are no vigilante militias
in the US, possibly exchanging emails and packing their trucks for a
patriotic cross-country road trip, but as of now what we have is
mostly the claims of one man.
Some
might say that this is a minor enough story and there are benefits to
be gained from dramatizing the threat. On the eve of the midterms,
where the caravan has been ridden hard by the Republicans as a source
of lawlessness, turning attention instead to role-playing Second
Amendment fanatics that embarrass even the most traditionalist
conservatives appears a solid strategy.
But
not everyone wins. Journalism, including that of august newspapers of
record, has a serious enough credibility problem without launching
invisible caravans.
Secondly,
if the authors of the articles believe that vigilantism is disruptive
and potentially deadly, there is an ethical dimension. They can
either play up the credibility of McGauley and his ilk for the
short-term gain of partisan fear-mongering, and in turn boost his
popularity, give him free advertising and help him recruit more men
to his cause, which presumably will mean more problems for the
legitimate border police and the migrants themselves. Or, with the
resources the Washington Post possesses, they could investigate or
challenge him to prove his claims, and discover whether he is an
online blowhard who can be ignored as he fades into irrelevance.
While the migrant caravan is in transit there is time left for both.
Igor
Ogorodnev
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.