Pentagon
Ceases Refueling Saudi Jets In Yemen Ahead Of Sanctions On Riyadh
10
November, 2018
In
a significant development, the White House is preparing to halt
the U.S. refueling of Saudi coalition jets engaged in operations over
Yemen. It's been
among the more controversial measures of assistance the Pentagon has
provided the Saudis and Emirates during three years of aerial
operations over Yemen, which has resulted in tens of thousands of
deaths, including a massive number of civilian casualties.
The New
York Times reports
that the "limited
punishment" is
to be accompanied by proposed sanctions on Riyadh over the
murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi:
The Trump administration is ending air refueling flights for the Saudi military campaign in Yemen and preparing sanctions against Saudis linked to the killing of Jamal Khashoggi, current and former American officials said on Friday. The moves would impose a limited punishment on the kingdom.
But
ironically even the Times is
aware of the
PR and propaganda nature of the move,
as it comes after the mainstream media has finally (after over three
years) "discovered" Yemen and after the U.N. dubbed it the
world's worst humanitarian crisis. It also comes after Turkey
revealed on Saturday that the US, Germany, France and the UK have the
Khashoggi audio death tapes in their possession.
The steps appear calibrated to respond to international outrage over the death of Mr. Khashoggi and to thousands of civilian deaths in the Yemen war, but avoid directly punishing the Saudi crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman, and could head off tougher congressional action.
So
really the move is much more symbolic without much teeth, and could
actually serve the purpose of softening future punitive congressional
action against the kingdom.
According
to various reports based on anonymous government sources, the White
House is expected to make an official announcement of the change in
Pentagon cooperation with the Saudi coalition in Yemen in the coming
days. But lending credence to the idea that this is really all about
"appearing" to get tough while in reality doing nothing
against one of America's closest Middle East
partners, Reuters reports based
on two government sources that the
decision was taken in part due to Saudi Arabia’s already
self-sustaining refueling capabilities.
The
Saudi-UAE-US coalition itself confirmed this in a statement
announcing the cessation of the
refueling efforts:
Recently, the Kingdom and the Coalition increased its capability to independently conduct inflight refueling in Yemen. As a result, in consultation with the United States, the Coalition has requested the cessation of inflight refueling support for its operations in Yemen.
Thus
this is confirmed PR damage control coming out of the coalition at a
moment when increasingly both Democratic and Republican members of
Congress have called on the US role in the Yemen war to cease.
Yet
the Washington Post, relying on on a former CIA officer still spun
the decision as follows:
“This marks the first time that the United States has taken a
concrete measure to rein in the Saudi war effort,” former career
CIA officer Bruce Riedel and Brookings Institution scholar
said.
“Two
administrations have basically given the Saudis a
blank check to do whatever they wanted.
Now it will be harder for the Saudis to carry out airstrikes deep
into Yemeni territory, going after the capital for instance,”
Riedel added.
Currently
a resolution is before Congress with the backing of a small but
growing group of key lawmakers that if passed would force
the US to end its military support for Saudi forces in Yemen within
30 days.
Of
course, the other less talked about but equally pressing issue is the
billions of dollars in weaponry that the United States and United
Kingdom provide to the Saudis.
President Trump had previously said within the weeks following Jamal
Khashoggi's death that he wants to get to the bottom of it and
promised "severe punishment" if Riyadh ordered the
killing.
Using
the economy as a straw man to avoid cracking down on Riyadh,
Trump told
60 minutes that "I
don’t want to hurt jobs. I don’t want to lose an order like
that,” and added, "There
are other ways of punishing, to use a word that’s a pretty harsh
word, but it’s true."
UN
delegates praise Saudi Arabia's rights record
7
November, 2018
Saudi
Arabia today won widespread
praise for
its human rights record as the fundamentalist regime was
examined in a routine UN review, prompting strong protests from human
rights activists.
“Sadly,
75 out of 96 country delegations who took the floor at the UN Human
Rights Council today expressed praise for the brutal and misogynistic
Saudi regime,” said Hillel Neuer, executive director of the
Geneva-based UN Watch, a non-governmental monitoring group.
“It’s
a betrayal of jailed Saudi human rights activists like pro-democracy
blogger Raif Badawi, who has been wrongfully imprisoned since June
2012. Despite our appeals to Canada, and
to Germany,
Britain, Sweden, France and
others, no one spoke up for Raif Badawi.”
Despite
today’s mandatory review of Saudi Arabia, in a standard
exercise that all countries undergo every five years, the
47-nation UNHRC has never produced a single resolution,
special session or commission of inquiry to condemn Saudi Arabia’s
human rights record — not even for their confessed killing of
journalist Jamal Khashoggi.
“On
the contrary,” said Neuer, “Saudi Arabia is an elected member of
the UN Human Rights Council.”
In
today’s meeting, China praised Saudi
Arabia for “its adoption and implementation of the Saudi
Vision 2030,” for its “efforts in the area of economic, social
development and poverty elimination” and its “judicial reform and
fight against corruption.”
And
in exchange, said Neuer, “tomorrow when China has its own turn to
be examined, I predict that Saudi Arabia will take the floor to
hail Beijing’s human rights record.”
Yemen applauded
Saudi “support provided all levels to the people of Yemen.”
Bahrain hailed Saudi Arabia’s “positive steps to protect human
rights.” Jordan said that “the Saudi government has made
human rights one of its main priorities.”
Malaysia
said Saudi “efforts in advancing women’s rights are commendable.”
Mauritania said “we applaud progress by Saudi Arabia in the fields
of women’s rights.” Eritrea commended “steps taken to ensure
equality.”
“We
believe that Saudi Arabia places great importance on human rights,”
said the Palestinian delegation. “We welcome its efforts in
promoting human rights, protecting development and ensuring
accountability.”
Only
a minority of countries applied real scrutiny, with UN Watch noting
statements by Australia, Austria, Britain, Canada, Denmark,
France, Iceland, Slovenia and Switzerland.
Neuer
called the exercise of dictatorships falsely praising each other a
“mutual praise society.”
“What
we witnessed today was the spectacle of anti-democratic regimes
like China, Venezuela and Myanmar falsely lauding Saudi Arabia
for human rights successes, knowing that the Saudi regime will
happily return the favor when their own records are under scrutiny,”
Neuer said.
“A
country with deeply-rooted discrimination against women in all
sectors of society should not be praised in a UN human rights review,
let alone sit on three
separate UN bodies that
are meant to protect women’s rights,” said Neuer
Revealed:
The UK is training Saudi pilots amid accusations of war crimes in
Yemen
22
October, 2018
The
Saudi Air Force is being trained by the British Government amid
accusations that it is carrying out atrocities in neighbouring Yemen,
it has emerged.
The
Liberal Democrats seized on the instruction being given, in both
Saudi Arabia and the UK itself – describing the revelation as
“shameful”.
Tom
Brake, the party’s foreign affairs spokesman, called on the
Ministry of Defence (MoD) to end the training immediately and for
much stricter controls on arms exports to the oil-rich kingdom.
Defence
Secretary Michael Fallon said the Royal Saudi Air Force was helped in
order to “improve their targeting processes” – and, therefore,
their compliance with international law.
But
Mr Brake said: "It is shameful that the UK Government is not
only arming Saudi pilots, it is training them as well. The
indiscriminate bombing of innocent civilians by Saudi Arabia in
Yemen, in clear breach of international humanitarian law, is now well
documented. The Government must end its complicity in this murderous
campaign.”
The
training opens up a new front in criticism of Britain’s close links
with Saudi Arabia – with the Saudis currently leading a coalition
bombing campaign against Houthi rebels in Yemen – at growing
humanitarian cost.
Earlier
this month, air strikes carried out by the coalition’s air forces
killed at least 140 people and injured up to 600 more at a funeral. A
report by the Saudi-led coalition’s Joint Incidents Assessment Team
(JIAT) admitted responsibility having promised an investigation into
the incident, but blamed “wrong information” from allies of the
internationally recognised Yemeni government, which it is supporting
in the conflict.
“A
party affiliated to the Yemeni presidency of the general chief of
staff wrongly passed information that there was a gathering of armed
Houthi leaders in a known location in Sanaa, and insisted that the
location be targeted immediately,” investigators said in a
statement at the time.
Saudi
Arabia insists the coalition it leads keeps to international laws,
with any incidents investigated.
Despite
the accusations of alleged war crimes, Theresa May has defended
selling arms to Saudi Arabia by insisting close ties “keep people
on the streets of Britain safe”.
The
admission that training is also taking place came in a written
parliamentary answer obtained by Labour MP Stephen Doughty from Mr
Fallon.
The
Liberal Democrat demanded to know what training and advice had been
given by the UK on authorising military operations and the “targeting
of aerial operations” over the past year.
In
reply, Mr Fallon wrote: “As part of our ongoing defence engagement
with Saudi Arabia, the UK has provided training to the Royal Saudi
Air Force (RSAF) both in the UK and in Saudi Arabia, including
international targeting courses for RSAF personnel, to improve their
targeting processes and to support International Humanitarian Law
(IHL) compliance.”
The
Defence Secretary said the UK had also delivered two training
sessions in Saudi Arabia on the process for investigating alleged IHL
violations, under a joint incident team it supported.
But
he added: “The UK has not been directly involved in investigations
undertaken by the JIAT, has not provided any specific operational
advice to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for operations in Yemen and has
not provided training on political authorisation of military
operations.”
Saudi
Arabia has insisted its campaign in Yemen is being waged "in
accordance with international humanitarian law, in a legitimate war
of self defence, in a legitimate war to defend the legitimate
government of Yemen".
Mr
Brake said the latest revelation emphasised the urgent need for
strict rules to require the Foreign Secretary to sign off personally
any arms sales to countries such as Saudi Arabia.
His
plan would see all 28 countries on the Foreign Office’s "countries
of concern" list – which also includes China and Russia –
denied arms without proof there was “no risk they’ll be used in
human rights abuses”.
Mr
Brake announced plans to bring forward a backbench Bill, hoping to
win the support of both Labour and the Scottish National party for
the crackdown.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.