Thursday, 15 November 2018

Dangerous" Radioactive Particles Into The Atmosphere from SoCal fire


WOOLSEY FIRE AND THE SANTA SUSANA FIELD LABORATORY

14 November, 2018
AERIAL PHOTO FROM CBSLA SHOWING THE START OF THE FIRE AT SSFL. HTTPS://TWITTER.COM/STU_MUNDEL/STATUS/1060692904107110400

We’ve received quite a few inquiries over the past several days regarding the potential consequences of the Woolsey Fire in Southern California, which has burned through part of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL) site in Ventura County immediately south of Simi Valley. The SSFL site, which closed in 1996, housed ten nuclear reactors as well as rocket engine test facilities, and is highly contaminated with radioactive and toxic wastes remaining from decades of poor disposal practices and numerous accidents. The public is understandably concerned about the possibility that contaminants have been spread by the fire, which reached the site on Fri. Nov. 8th, but was reportedly no longer burning within it the following day.

SAFECAST RADIATION MAP OF THE REGION AFFECTED BY THE WOOLSEY FIRE, WITH CAL FIRE DATA OVERLAY. SSFL LOCATION INDICATED BY A RED DOT.

Safecast had no survey data from the immediate SSFL area prior to the fire, but we had a fair amount of data from nearby communities which showed it to be at normal background levels. Our realtime radiation and particulate sensors in the Southern California region, the closet of which is 30km (about 18 miles) away from SSFL, have shown no measurable increases in radiation. Safecast volunteers are on the way to the site, however, so hopefully we will have new data to share soon. Though CalFire indicates that the fire danger in the SSFL area has passed, many roads are still closed, making access difficult. 

SATELLITE IMAGERY FROM JPL/ARIA. AREAS AFFECTED BY THE WOOLSEY FIRE ARE SHOWN IN COLOR. SSFL IS LOCATED WITHIN THE AREA INDICATED BY THE GREEN CIRCLE (ANNOTATED ADDED BY SAFECAST).

Official agencies, including the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC ) and the LA County Department of Public Health have issued statements saying that they have surveyed the site and detected no radiation above normal background levels. As of this writing, neither agency has provided actual measurement data or details about their methodology. One potential health concern would be from inhalation of radioactive material lofted by the fire and carried by the smoke plumes. Inhalation of smoke and particulate matter itself certainly presents a health risk, and people living in the region have been advised to protect themselves against that. As has been demonstrated at Chernobyl, wildfires in radioactively contaminated areas can resuspend radioactive material and carry it significant distances. The Chernobyl research cited above, which analysed the effects of fires of similar magnitude to Woolsey in a more highly contaminated region, suggested that radiation doses to the most affected people would be higher than background but still within the same range. These researchers were able to make these estimates because they were able to carefully measure the radiation that was released by the fires.

AERIAL PHOTO OF SSFL SITE, 1985, SHOWING SITES OF ACCIDENTS AND OTHER INCIDENTS (CREDITS: PHOTO: DOE; ANNOTATIONS: SSFL WORK GROUP)
 
Radioactivity from ground contamination is relatively easy to measure, and we should be able to answer some questions about this soon. In addition, we will continue to look for available data that might show changes in airborne radiation that may have been caused by this fire. This would have to come from radiation monitors that were already in place nearby beforehand. This is why Safecast continues to stress the importance of having sensors in place before an incident like this occurs. Without adequate data, important questions cannot be answered, and there is no substitute for being prepared.
 
More information:

6, Article number: 26062 (2016)


SoCal Fire May Have Ejected "Incredibly Dangerous" Radioactive Particles Into The Atmosphere

14 November, 2018

The 95,000 acre Woolsey fire which has coated Southern California with an apocalyptic orange glow may have released a toxic stew of radioactive particles and toxic chemicals into the air, after scorching the land on closed-down government weapons testing facility in Simi Hills known to be heavily contaminated from decades of experiments.

Commencing operation in 1947 for Rockwell's Rocketdyne Division, a government contractor for the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), the Santa Susana Field Lab (SSFL) has a checkered safety record, to put it lightly. In addition to several nuclear accidents - including the worst nuclear meltdown in US history, toxic materials have accumulated on-site from years of dumping, just miles from thousands of residents. 


It was the site of several nuclear accidents, including the worst nuclear meltdown in US history when, in 1959, facility operators intentionally vented nuclear material from the site’s “Sodium Reactor Experiment” to prevent it from overheating and exploding. By the time the leaks were closed, the site had released 459 times more radiation than was leaked during the better-known 1979 meltdown at Three Mile Island.
The lab property, now owned by airplane manufacturer Boeing, stretches for 2,800 acres in the Simi Hills, and remains contaminated with toxic materials. Thousands of people live within two miles of the site, and roughly half a million live within 10 miles, according to an investigation by NBC 4 Los Angeles. -Quartz  

California officials with the state's Department of Toxic Substances Control said that as of Friday, November 9, an area of the SSFL site which was scorched by the Woolsey fire posed no danger, stating "Our scientists and toxicologists have reviewed information about the fire’s location and do not believe the fire has caused any releases of hazardous materials that would pose a risk to people exposed to the smoke." 

A group of concerned physicians begs to differ. 

According to Robert Dodge - a physician and president of Physicians for Social Responsibility Los Angeles, highly toxic materials embedded in SSFL's soil and vegetation may have been spewed into the air by the Woolsey fire. 
"We know what substances are on the site and how hazardous they are. We’re talking about incredibly dangerous radionuclides and toxic chemicals such a trichloroethylene, perchlorate, dioxins and heavy metals," said Dodge, adding: 

"These toxic materials are in SSFL’s soil and vegetation, and when it burns and becomes airborne in smoke and ash, there is real possibility of heightened exposure for area residents."
Weighing in with satellite imagery tells a similarly two-sided story. These images show that the fires did spread to the compound, but they didn’t take down structures. With near-infrared imagery, dense vegetation appears red while burn scars from the Woolsey fire contrast as dark brown.


Dodge's group has also criticized the California Department of Toxic Substances Control - pointing out that the state-run agency is currently under a state-mandated independent review to investigate its handling of toxic cleanups. 

According to a Draft environmental statement from the Energy department, Santa Susana Field Laboratory and its adjoining Northern Buffer Zone has never been fully cleaned up


A 1998 article of Los Angeles Magazine details horrific cancers and other conditions which have afflicted those living near, and working at the site. 
"Children growing up near the site swam and fished in streams and played in the dry wash. And one day, Garner rode his red J.C. Higgins bike he got for Christmas through effluent flowing from the lab. 
Garner, now 44, lives in Simi Valley. An ironworker, he's done contract jobs at the lab over the years. In October 1996, he was diagnosed with lymphoma. His wife Leslie had her uterus removed because of cervical cancers. His father - like Garner an ironworker employed occasionally at the lab - has skin cancer and heart problems and is near death. His sister Vickie, 46, has heart and thyroid problems. On one side of a single block of Ramara Avenue in Woodland Hills, five miles from the plant, cancer has been diagnosed in 9 out of 10 houses." -Los Angeles Magazine

Meanwhile, here's where the potentially toxic plume of smoke traveled as of November 9:


Embedded video

Here is a look at the Woolsey Fire in California as seen from the GOES-16 Weather Satellite this afternoon.
218 people are talking about this


No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.