I should think so!
Seaking from the Left, Chris Trotter has a head on his shoulders and defends free speech.
He also more accurately describes them, not as 'far right' but as 'alt-right'
Do We Really Lack the Courage to Debate the Alt-Right? Do We Really Lack the Ideas to Defeat Them?
Over the past few days Molyneux and Southern have very skilfully tested our tolerance – and we have failed. They’ve also tested our ability to re-state, re-affirm and justify our commitment to freedom of expression. We failed that test too.
STEFAN MOLYNEUX AND LAUREN SOUTHERN gave New Zealanders an opportunity to test their values – most especially their tolerance. Controversialists, almost by profession, these two Canadians espouse ideas which most Kiwis find extremely jarring. We have come to accept human equality and religious tolerance as the unequivocal markers of all decent and rational societies. For a great many people it is deeply offensive to hear these concepts challenged openly.
Free speech group raises $50k to challenge Auckland Council over 'far-Right' speaker ban
A group of lawyers, academics and ex-politicians will take an Auckland Council agency to court over its decision to bar two far-Right speakers from using a council-owned venue.
10
June, 2018
Free
Speech Coalition says it has successfully raised $50,000 needed for
the court action – a judicial review of Auckland Live's decision to
cancel a venue booking for controversial Canadian duo Lauren Southern
and Stefan Molyneux.
The
pair were due to speak at Takapuna's Bruce Mason Theatre in August as
part of an Australasian tour.
But
Auckland Live director Robbie Macrae last week said security concerns
around "the health and safety of the presenters, staff and
patrons" led to the event's cancellation.
* Call
for judicial review of Auckland Council agency's blocking of
far-right speakers
* Controversial Canadian speaker denied visa as Auckland agency cancels booking
* Controversial Canadian speaker denied visa as Auckland agency cancels booking
Auckland
Mayor Phil Goff backed that decision, tweeting: "Views that
divide rather than unite are repugnant and I have made my views on
this very clear."
On
Tuesday, political commentator Chris Trotter, a supporter of Free
Speech Coalition, said the group had reached its $50,000 funding
target in less than 24 hours.
It
would begin proceedings against the council for its ban on Southern
and Molyneux from council venues.
"We
had hoped to raise this money by 5pm Friday," Trotter said in a
press release.
Winston Peters would have let far-right commentators talk at venue on 'basis of free speech'
Winston
Peters would have let far-right commentators Lauren Southern and
Stefan Molyneux speak to preserve freedom of speech, he said today
Weasel words from the Auckland mayor -
Phil Goff defends blocking far-right speakers who 'spout racist nonsense'
Auckland
mayor Phil Goff says he has not stopped far-right activists from
speaking but was not going to aid and abet them by providing them
with council venues.
Seaking from the Left, Chris Trotter has a head on his shoulders and defends free speech.
He also more accurately describes them, not as 'far right' but as 'alt-right'
Do We Really Lack the Courage to Debate the Alt-Right? Do We Really Lack the Ideas to Defeat Them?
Over the past few days Molyneux and Southern have very skilfully tested our tolerance – and we have failed. They’ve also tested our ability to re-state, re-affirm and justify our commitment to freedom of expression. We failed that test too.
STEFAN MOLYNEUX AND LAUREN SOUTHERN gave New Zealanders an opportunity to test their values – most especially their tolerance. Controversialists, almost by profession, these two Canadians espouse ideas which most Kiwis find extremely jarring. We have come to accept human equality and religious tolerance as the unequivocal markers of all decent and rational societies. For a great many people it is deeply offensive to hear these concepts challenged openly.
Over
the past few days Molyneux and Southern have very skilfully tested
our tolerance – and we have failed. They’ve also tested our
ability to re-state, re-affirm and justify our commitment to freedom
of expression. We failed that test too.
But
just imagine if, instead of asking the Minister of Immigration to
prevent Molyneux and Southern from entering the country, the New
Zealand Federation of Islam Associations had invited them to debate
the Islamic religion with a couple of their faith’s most
accomplished scholars. In the face of the Canadians’ openly hostile
reading of the Koran, the Federation could have transformed their
assailants’ prejudice into a profound “teaching moment” for all
New Zealanders. Rather than the caricature of Islam presented by its
enemies, we could have heard the true voice of the Prophet and gained
a much deeper understanding of his message.
Of
course, Molyneux and Southern could have refused to debate the
Federations’ representatives (perhaps fearing that in a calm,
respectful, and properly moderated setting, their contribution might
not have sounded all that convincing) but just think about how bad
that would have made them look. They would have been exposed as not
having the courage of their convictions: of having “fake views”.
Imagine,
too, if the Q+A programme had set aside an entire hour for a
televised debate between Molyneux and Southern, representing the
Alt-Right; and two representatives of the New Zealand Left. (Annette
Sykes and John Minto spring to mind!) For 60 minutes, New Zealanders
could have heard debated the ideas and causes that are currently
driving global politics. Alternatively, TVNZ could have set up one of
its live “town-hall meetings” at which a broad cross-section of
Kiwis could have asked questions of the two right-wing provocateurs.
Once
again they could have refused. But, once again, that would merely
have confirmed their status as rhetorical bomb-throwers – not
genuine protagonists of serious ideas.
But
what if they restricted their appearances to halls in which only
their most fervid supporters were guaranteed entry? What would the
correct response be to that situation?
According
to Peace Action Auckland’s Valerie Morse, the response of those
opposed to the views being expressed by Molyneux and Southern should
have been to “stand in solidarity with the Muslim community in
Aotearoa who are opposing these fascists. If they come here, we will
confront them on the streets. If they come, we will blockade entry to
their speaking venue”.
Which
is, of course, exactly the response Molyneux and Southern would have
been hoping for. It has been of enormous assistance to their cause to
be able to upload on to social media the hate-filled faces of their
enemies. Such images of their left-wing opponents screaming and
shouting and doing all within their power to shut down their meetings
are pure gold to the propagandists of the Alt-Right.
Everything
that Mayor Phil Goff, the Auckland Council, Ms Morse and her fellow
extremists have done so far is provide Molyneux and Southern with
invaluable material for their one-million-strong YouTube audience.
Every attempt to suppress their freedom of expression by
administrative fiat, or force, fuels the anger of their supporters
and confirms the Alt-Right’s view of the Left as dangerous enemies
of liberty.
What
they would have been very loath to upload, however, would have been
images of them being soundly defeated by Muslim scholars; or
floundering before the questioning of participants in TVNZ’s
town-hall meeting. Especially useless to them would have been images
of a huge and dignified gathering of New Zealanders bearing witness
outside the Bruce Mason Centre in Takapuna. Maori and Pakeha,
Christian and Muslim, immigrant and native-born, gay and straight –
all standing quietly with their arms linked under a forest of New
Zealand flags and banners proclaiming this country’s unwavering
commitment to human equality, religious tolerance and freedom of
speech.
Had
we been mature enough, as a free and democratic nation, to meet the
challenge of Molyneux and Southern in such a fashion, the two
Alt-Right Canadians would have had nothing to show their followers.
But, we New Zealanders would have had something to show the world.
We
could have shown a global audience a nation confident enough to
debate those truths proclaimed by Thomas Jefferson to be self-evident
with all comers. We could have shown a planet hard beset by the worst
kind of right-wing propaganda a people capable of passing the values
test set by the likes of Molyneux and Southern with flying colours.
Because,
as the great English poet, John Milton, wrote in his famous pamphlet,
Areopagitica: “I cannot praise a fugitive and cloistered virtue,
unexercised and unbreathed, that never sallies out and sees her
adversary, but slinks out of the race where that immortal garland is
to be run for, not without dust and heat.”
Truth
is not afraid of trigger-words. Truth does not need a safe space.
Truth is not a snowflake. Truth can take the heat and most certainly
should not be forced to vacate the kitchen in the face of a couple of
Alt-Right provocateurs and a politically-correct Mayor.
From Radio NZ
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.