"Urgent action is needed,"
This is a bit like saying that the gates need to be closed after the horse has bolted.
'Utterly
Terrifying': Study Affirms Feedback Loop Fears as Surging Antarctica
Ice Loss Tripled in Last Five Years
"The
most robust study of the ice mass balance of Antarctica to date,"
scientists say, "now puts Antarctica in the frame as one of the
largest contributors to sea-level rise."
14
June, 2018
Scientists
are expressing alarm over "utterly
terrifying"
new findings from
NASA and the European Space Agency that Antarctica has
lost about
3 trillion tons of ice since
1992, and in the past five years—as the atmospheric and ocean
temperatures have continued to climb amid ongoing reliance on fossil
fuels—ice losses have tripled.
This
should be a wake-up call, said University of Leeds professor Andrew
Shepherd, a lead author of the report. "These events and the
sea-level rise they've triggered are an indicator of climate change
and should be of concern for the governments we trust to protect our
coastal cities and communities."
"The outlook for the future is looking different to what it was," explained Shepherd. "There has been a sharp increase, with almost half the loss coming in the last five years alone."
Up until 2012, "we could not detect any acceleration," but after that, based on surveys by satellites, they saw a threefold increase in the rate of ice melt. "That's a big jump, and it did catch us all by surprise," Shepherd said. "A threefold increase now puts Antarctica in the frame as one of the largest contributors to sea-level rise. The last time we looked at the polar ice sheets, Greenland was the dominant contributor. That's no longer the case."
Today’s news on Antarctica — ice loss there has accelerated 300% over the past 25 years — is utterly terrifying.
“As we observe the system for longer, we see more and more changes of the type we feared could happen as the climate warms” —@helenafricker
Today’s news on Antarctica — ice loss there has accelerated 300% over the past 25 years — is utterly terrifying.
“As we observe the system for longer, we see more and more changes of the type we feared could happen as the climate warms” —@helenafricker
Aboout
decade ago, as New
Scientist noted,
"the
official view was
that there would be no net ice loss from Antarctica over the next
century."
Even so, Dr. James Hansen, "the father of modern climate change awareness," warned at the time, "The primary issue is whether global warming will reach a level such that ice sheets begin to disintegrate in a rapid, non-linear fashion on West Antarctica, Greenland or both."
"Once well under way, such a collapse might be impossible to stop, because there are multiple positive feedbacks," Hansen wrote for New Scientist in 2007. "In that event, a sea level rise of several meter at least would be expected."
Fears of so-called feedback loops have long been a critical part of the scientific community's warnings about what runaway climate change could mean.
According to the report out this week—which was conducted by 84 researchers across 44 institutions—and others that have preceded it, the most serious melting is occuring in West Antarctica. "When we look into the ocean we find that it's too warm and the ice sheet can't withstand the temperatures that are surrounding it in the sea," which is causing glaciers to melt more rapidly into the oceans, Shepherd explained.
East
Antarctica, meanwhile, has experienced far less melting because the
bulk of its ice is above sea level, he added. That is "an
important distinction, because it means it's insulated from changes
in the ocean's temperature."
"I think we should be worried. That doesn't mean we should be desperate," University of California Irvine's Isabella Velicogna, one of 88 co-authors," told the Associated Press. "Things are happening. They are happening faster than we expected."
"This
is extremely concerning news and confirms what we already know about
the impacts of burning fossil fuels: our climate is at a dangerous
tipping point that is putting the communities of low-lying islands
and our coasts at great risk," said Hoda Baraka, 350.org's
global communications director.
"This
is why tens of thousands of people around the world will join the
Rise for Climate mobilization on and around the 8th September—to
drive climate action within our communities," Bakara added, "and
send a clear message to governments that the science is clear, we
have the momentum, the technology for the energy transition is ready
and we demand bold action now."
This
has been carrried in the New Zealand media as well. No mention of feedback loops though.
What
happens in only the next decade could determine the fate of
Antarctica - and the melting continent's future impact on our coastal
cities and communities.
Scientists
have sketched two 2070 scenarios - one leaving warming unchecked,
another avoiding the worst effects of climate change - alongside new
research that revealed Antarctica had lost three trillion tonnes of
ice in less than three decades.
In
the first scenario, the world's greenhouse gas emissions kept rising,
with little policy action taken to slow climate change's impact on
Antarctica.
That
meant a dramatic loss of major ice shelves, sea warming, sea-ice
retreat and ocean acidification and metres of global sea-level rise
over coming centuries.
But
under the low emissions scenario - which could be achieved if future
temperature rise was limited to the 2C threshold sought by the Paris
Agreement - Antarctica would look much as it did in the earlier
decades of the century, and global sea-level rise would remain under
the one-metre mark.
The
new reasearch shows global sea levels are rising three times faster
than a quarter of a century ago because of global warming.
Ice
losses from Antarctica have increased sea levels by almost 8mm since
1992, with two-fifths of this rise coming in the past five years
alone.
"The
bad news is that time is short and emissions need to peak in the next
decade and reduce to zero before the end of the century," said
co-author Professor Tim Naish, of Victoria University's Antarctic
Research Centre.
Naish
said other risks - such as competition for resources and food
security - could threaten the long-standing Antarctic Treaty, and New
Zealand's own influence on the continent's preservation.
"Urgent
action is needed," Naish said.
"Put
simply, if we cannot collectively tackle climate change, then it's
unlikely we will maintain Antarctica as a place for peace, nature and
science."
A
special edition of the major scientific journal Nature also included
a raft of new research on the continent, which bore an equivalent 58m
of potential sea-level rise.
Before
2012, Antarctica lost ice at a steady rate of 76 billion tonnes per
year – a 0.2 mm per year contribution to sea level rise.
But
since then there has been a sharp, threefold increase.
Between
2012 and 2017 the continent lost 219 billion tonnes of ice per year –
a 0.6 mm per year sea-level contribution.
And
between 1992 and 2017, the Antarctic Ice Sheet lost about three
trillion tonnes of ice - equivalent to around 8mm of mean sea-level
rise.
During
this 26-year period, ocean-driven melting led to a tripling of
ice-loss rates from West Antarctica, from 53 billion to 159 billion
tonnes per year.
The
rate of ice loss from the Antarctic Peninsula increased from about 7
billion to 33 billion tonnes per year as a result of ice-shelf
collapse.
In
West Antarctica, ice shelves were being eaten away by warm ocean
water, and those in the Amundsen and Bellingshausen seas are up to 18
per cent thinner than in the early 1990s.
At
the Antarctic Peninsula, where air temperatures had risen sharply,
ice shelves have collapsed as their surfaces have melted.
Altogether,
34,000 sq km of ice shelf area had been lost since the 1950s.
While
East Antarctica's mass balance remained highly uncertain and was
indistinguishable from zero, reassessments of the models could
improve understanding of what was happening.
"The
new collection of research and review papers paint a clear and
coherent picture about the things that keep Antarctic scientists up
at night," said Professor Christina Hulbe, of the University of
Otago.
While
massive change was clearly underway in Antarctica and in the Southern
Ocean, Hulbe said that didn't mean the new evidence should be read as
doom and gloom.
"While
some amount of change is already locked in, there are always choices
to be made and it's still possible to avert the worst of the climate
projections."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.