The
most depressing energy chart of the year
Coal
has got to go.
Vox,
16 June, 2018
The
energy giant BP’s annual Statistical
Review of World Energy is a
compendium of facts, figures, charts, and graphs on global energy
use. This year’s edition is out, and it contains one of the more
alarming, not to mention depressing, charts I’ve seen in a long
while.
It’s
not the chart most of the media coverage has focused on, which shows
coal having a sharp reversal of fortune after several years of
decline.
Nor
is it this one, which shows the rate of growth in energy productivity
— the amount of GDP the economy extracts from a unit of energy —
slowing all over the world, and the growth in primary energy
consumption rising sharply in Organisation for Economic Co-operation
and Development (OECD) countries:
Both
those graphs are disheartening, I grant you, and they help explain
why global carbon dioxide emissions, after holding roughly steady for
three years, started edging back up in 2017.
As
BP chief economist Spencer Dale explains in an analysis that
accompanies the report, this is is evidence that some of the
short-term, cyclical trends that were helping drive the happy results
of the past few years (energy demand growth slowing, energy
productivity increasing, carbon emissions holding steady) have played
themselves out. Heavy industry is picking up again in China; coal is
growing quickly in India and ticked up again in China after years of
decline.
Most
of all, economic growth accelerated. Renewables continued their
gangbusters growth, but as long as the majority of the world economy
is powered by fossil fuels, a macro trend like economic growth is
going to overwhelm the rise of clean energy on the margins.
That’s
what happened in 2017: Growth, which had slowed for a few years,
serving to highlight the rise of clean energy, cranked up again. The
connection between economic growth and growth in carbon emissions is
not quite “decoupled,” it seems.
But
Dale warns against overreacting to these short-term swings. He writes
that “many of the structural forces shaping the energy transition
continued, particularly robust growth in renewables and natural gas.”
Year-to-year fluctuations are less important than those bigger
trends.
Coal
has the same share of global power generation it had 20 years ago
No,
those aren’t the most depressing graphs. The one that spooked me
(and Dale, who calls it “the most striking — and worrying —
chart in the whole of this Statistical Review”) is this one:
In 1998, coal represented 38 percent of global power generation. In 2017, it represented ... 38 percent of global power generation.
In electricity, a sector that absorbs 40 percent of the world’s primary energy and produces more than a third of its emissions, the past 20 years have been running to stay still. No net decarbonization progress has been made.
Here are power sources broken out individually:
Nuclear has declined, renewables have risen, and the overall proportion of global electricity coming from non-fossil sources has remained roughly the same.
That’s not going to cut it to avoid catastrophic climate change. Scenarios that show us hitting the climate targets agreed to in Paris involve OECD countries completely decarbonizing the electricity sector by 2030 or so, and other countries not long after.
For all the bad news it has received lately, coal remains the greatest threat to a stable climate and the logical first target for a world serious about decarbonizing. It has got to go.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.