The Senate Just Gave the Pentagon an $82 Billion Boost. That's More Money Than Russia's Entire Military Budget.
Democrats
will oppose anything Trump wants, unless it's more money for the
Pentagon.
Reason,
21 June, 2018
There are few bipartisan projects in Congress these days, but Republicans and Democrats have no trouble joining together to feed more money into the Pentagon's gaping maw.
By
a vote of 85-10 on
Thursday morning, the Senate approved the annual National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA)—technically known as the "John S.
McCain National Defense Authorization Act" because you
wouldn't vote against something named after an American hero,
right? It
serves as the budget for the U.S. military, which this year is
receiving $716 billion, an increase of $82 billion from last year.
That increase was agreed upon in March as part of an overall two-year
budget deal that smashed Obama-era spending caps and boosts
military spending by
$165 over the next two years.
It's
not just that military spending crosses party lines, but that it
smooths over nearly every political division in Washington today.
Democrats have shown virtually no interest in Trump's major policy
priorities, but only seven Democrats plus Sen. Bernie Sanders
(I-Vt.), who caucuses with Democrats, voted against Trump's new
nukes. Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah) were the only
Republicans to vote against the NDAA. An attempt by Sander, Lee, and
some other senators to include an
amendment prohibiting
the Pentagon from continuing to participate in an unauthorized war in
Yemen was defeated.
The
spending increase will allow the Pentagon to buy more fighter jets,
to create "cyberwarfare units," and to develop new, smaller
nuclear weapons.
There is, however, no
Space Force.
The extra $82 billion will "bring us back to a position of
primacy," Defense Secretary James Mattis said in
February.
To
put the Pentagon's $82 billion funding increase in perspective,
consider that Russia's entire military budget totals only
$61 billion.
China, which boast the next most expensive military in the world
after the United States, plans to spend about
$175 billion this
year.
Maybe
the problem isn't how much funding the military receives, but how the
money it already gets is spent. Unfortunately, we don't know much
about that because the Pentagon has still not been subjected to a
full scale audit, despite the fact that all federal agencies and
departments were ordered to undergo mandatory audits in 1990. A
preliminary audit of one office within the Pentagon found more
than $800 million could
not be located. Auditors said the Pentagon's Defense Logistics Agency
(DLA)—described as "the military's Walmart" because it's
responsible for processing supplies and equipment—has financial
management "so weak that its leaders and oversight bodies have
no reliable way to track the huge sums it's responsible for."
Whether
it's investing in bomb-sniffing
elephants,
paying $8,000
for something that should cost $50,
or the famous
$640 toilet seat,
there's no shortage of absurd waste in the Pentagon. A Reuters probe
in 2013 found
"$8.5 trillion in taxpayer money doled out to the Pentagon since
1996 … has never been accounted for.
That sum exceeds the value of
China's economic output [for 2012]."
"To
give the Defense Department more money without making sure the waste
is addressed is foolish and strategically unwise," Bonnie
Kristian, a fellow at Defense Priorities, wrote for Reason earlier
this year.
But
Congress and the White House have no such qualms about handing the
Pentagon more money to burn.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.