Macron
email hacking shows that free speech is dead in France
A
non-judicial state body has threatened publishers with criminal
prosecution.
5
May, 2017
Nearly
9 gigabytes of information from private emails belonging to French
Presidential candidate Emmanuel Macron have been leaked after an
apparent hack. The leaks came to light late Friday evening, less
than two days before polls open in the final round of elections.
The
hack is said to contain business documents and related photos.
Macron’s
campaign have said that some of
the leaked files are fake.
Wikileaks
is currently running each document through its copious verification
process.
But
this is not even the main story.
The
main story is that the French Election Control Commission released a
statement threatening legal, including criminal action against anyone
who publishes the content of the leaks.
“The Commission therefore asks the media, and websites in particular, not to report on the content of the data (of the Macron leak), recalling that the dissemination of false information is liable to fall within the scope of the law, in particular criminal law”.
This
is an outrage on several levels.
1.
Overly Draconian Media Regime in France
Even
prior to the authentication of the documents, it is still in the
public good to know the content of these documents with the warning
‘alleged’/’unverified’ in front of any article describing
said documents.
This
is done all the time in unconfirmed information relating to matters
of life and death on the battle field. I should think that such
matters are far more sensitive than the private dealers of a wealthy,
healthy living man.
2.
A State-run Disinformation Campaign
If
the documents are proved to be authentic and Wikileaks who are
authenticating them now are the best source in the business, it is
imperative that these documents be released in full.
Anything
less would be a state-run disinformation campaign to try and prohibit
information relevant to the public good from being freely and legally
disseminated. In this sense it would be the French state that is
unduly influencing the election by forcing the withholding of
relevant facts from the public prior to polling day.
These
are the tactics of a dictatorship, not a democracy.
3.
Abuse of Power
The
French state is engaging in an abuse of power exercise. It is not for
an un-elected electoral commission to make a ruling on the legality
of publishing these or any other documents. In a free society, this
would be the charge of the judicial branch of government.
If
the information was proved false, in a free society, Macron would
have the ability to sue for libel or ask a judge for a gag-order.
In
a free society, if the information were true, Macron would have to do
something that he’s never done in his entire life: MAN UP!
The
most shocking element of this saga is that both the mainstream
and alt-media have taken this sitting down. While no one wants to be
arrested by the French, we in the media should at least complain and
complain loudly about France’s barbarically backward free speech
laws.
These
obscurantist laws seem tailor made for Macron who has revealed
himself not only to be the pro-war candidate but also the
pro-censorship candidate. Vichy Macron is far more dangerous
than the reformist, free-speech minded daughter of Jean-Marie Le Pen.
I’m
trying to imagine how the media might react if Russia had such
primitive and dictatorial laws against free speech?
Funnily
enough, when Russia made existing libel statues subject to criminal
as well as civil penalties, something which amounted to nothing
more than fines for the guilty being issued at the request of
prosecutors in some cases and private claimants in most others, the
western mainstream media and western NGOs were up
in arms.
However,
there is almost no one criticising the French abuse of power which
aims to stifle and has largely been successful in stifling
journalism. The double standards are incredible.
Macron
is from this same establishment trying to censor free speech. Just
let that sink in.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.