Fake News Day: One Day, Three Serious News Stories That Turn Out to be False
16
May, 2017
It
is a fake news day. Three stories are making the rounds through the
media that are each based on false or widely exaggerated
interpretation of claims. North Korea, Syria and the U.S. President
are the targets.
1.
The Wall Street Journal asserts with a #fakenews headline that bits
of computer-code in the recent WannaCry ransom virus are identical
with bits of computer code that was allegedly used in a 2014 hack of
Sony. (The Sony attack was falsely attributed
to North Korea.)
Neel Mehta, a security researcher at Alphabet Inc.’s Google unit, on Monday pointed out similarities between that earlier WannaCry variant and code used in a series of attacks that security specialists have attributed to the Lazarus group.
The
“Lazarus group” (which probably does not exist at all) was
attributed to North Korean state agencies. Six paragraphs later we
learn that the “similarities” were found in often reused code:
The findings don’t necessarily demonstrate that Lazarus or North Korea was involved in the WannaCry attack, researchers said. The culprits in the latest attack, who haven’t been identified, could have copied the code in question, for example.
…
The connection found in the old version lies in software that both programs use to securely connect to other systems over the internet, said Kurt Baumgartner, a Kaspersky Lab researcher.
Common
code is found in nearly all software that sets up an internet
connection. The reason for that is quite simple. No longer does
anyone ever write such code. There are well tested examples of such
program snippets widely available in open-source software on Github
and elsewhere. “Copy and paste” is done faster than re-inventing
the wheel. Even worse – the code snippet in question here is
so trivialthat
any decent programmer would likely write it the very same way (a call
to the Time() function
to get a seed value for a following call to the Random() function).
There are only X reasonable ways to add 1 to 1. Two people doing it
the same way proves nothing at all. People copying publicly available
code proves nothing either. It certainly does not prove that code for
two different hacks was written by the same people. It does not
provided that these bugs have anything at all to do with North Korea.
The bits of similarities are of zero factual news value.
2.
Back in February Amnesty International (which promotes
NATO interventions)
issued a sensational report about alleged killings in Syrian prisons.
As we wrote at
that time:
A new Amnesty International report claims that the Syrian government hanged between 5,000 and 13,000 prisoners in a military prison in Syria. The evidence for that claim is flimsy, based on hearsay of anonymous people outside of Syria. The numbers themselves are extrapolations that no scientist or court would ever accept. It is tabloid reporting and fiction style writing from its title “Human Slaughterhouse” down to the last paragraph.
The
U.S. State Department now reused that fake report and adds wrongly
interpreted satellite pics to further slander the
Syrian government:
In its latest accusations of Syrian abuses, the State Department said it believed about 50 detainees each day are being hanged at Saydnaya military prison, about 45 minutes north of Damascus. Many of the bodies are then burned in the crematorium “to cover up the extent of mass murders taking place,” said Stuart Jones, the top U.S. diplomat for the Middle East, accusing Assad’s government of sinking “to a new level of depravity.”The department released commercial satellite photographs showing what it described as a building in the prison complex that was modified to support the crematorium. The photographs, taken over the course of several years, beginning in 2013, do not prove the building is a crematorium, but show construction consistent with such use.
If
there was a crematorium being build in the Saydnaya prison how is it
that none of the Amnesty witness said so in the recent Amnesty
report? These witnesses, Amnesty claims, have been in that prison and
observed all kind of details. They claim that any dead were buried in
mass graves.
A
Dutch military expert looks at the commercial satellite pictures and
the interpretation State provided and asks:
Ian Grant @Gjoene – 6:02 PM – 15 May 2017Is this a joke @StateDept? Even before 27 Aug ’13 these “vents” were present. See included Terraserver footage (03 april ’13) #Sednaya
Aldin Abazović @CT_operative – 5:33 PM – 15 May 2017Pictures that allegedly show crematorium of Saidnaya prison, #Damascus #Syria. As much as I hate to get involved into this matter, these #1
#2 images prove nothing at all. This building could be simple boiler/heating room for the prison compound. Unless you visit there is no
#3 way to prove anything. Its easy to manipulate with satellite imagery. You just put the right label on thing and there you have it
#4 I can’t confirm what the particular part of prison is nor for what it’s used.
The
State Department has no evidence for its “crematorium claim” but
the Amnesty report which says nothing about a crematorium at the
prison and some satellite pictures that do not show what the State
Department claims. It is throwing dirt at the Syria government in the
hope that some of it will stick. This release of nothing will
create some headlines in “western” outrage publications.
It may be in propaganda preparation for a wider war on Syria.
3.
The deep state is out to get U.S. President
Trump impeached.
Yesterday a new, well prepared and coordinated campaign against Trump
was launched. Anonymous claims to the Washington Post were
“confirmed” by similar claims from (likely) the same sources to
Buzzfeed. The claims may have some grounds in reality but the actual
facts, even as described in shrill words, are harmless. WaP:
President Trump revealed highly classified information to the Russian foreign minister and ambassador in a White House meeting last week, according to current and former U.S. officials, who said Trump’s disclosures jeopardized a critical source of intelligence on the Islamic State.
(Hmm
– how would “former U.S. officials” know what was said in the
Oval Office and to what consequences?) It takes six paragraphs of
such slander to learn what Trump actually disclosed:
Trump went off script and began describing details of an Islamic State terrorist threat related to the use of laptop computers on aircraft.
“Terrorist
threat[s] related to the use of laptop computers on aircraft” are
a well
known method of
Al-Qaeda in the Arab Peninsula. If ISIS in Syria has copied that
modus operandi it is interesting, but nothing sensational. The
details, where ISIS is preparing these operations, may be somewhat
relevant, but over how many cites does ISIS actually rule?
National
Security Advisor McMaster,
who was in the room with Trump and Lavrov, is on the record (down in
paragraph eight!) denying that any sources or methods were revealed.
The
only real claim here is that Trump gave Lavrov a tip-off with regard
to a terrorist threat.
If
Putin would learn of a potential ISIS attack on a U.S. passenger jet
would you want him to share that secret information with the U.S.
government? Of course you would.
But Buzzfeed and other
anti-Trump organs blow
the claims up to high heavens, The Lawfare writers
go off their meds:
If the President gave this information away through carelessness or neglect, he has arguably breached his oath of office.
Utter
bullshit. Trump would have offered such intelligence out of courtesy
as part of his deal-making with the Russian government. Exchange of
threat intelligence is regular business even between parties who
otherwise dislike each other. It is in the interests of all to do
such. That such an exchange happened is not newsworthy. even it
touched some details.
Even
worse – it is the publishing about the Oval office talk that can
only help the terrorists. As Emptywheel says:
these very outraged sources are [..] sharing the information that it is so outrageous to share.
If
Trump’s information sharing is outrageous why
did the sources offer that same information to the global media? Why
did WaPo and others publish on it?
Trump
was elected with the support of the U.S. military. Clinton was
supported by the corporate and intelligence sides of the power
triangle.
Trump won. Now the deep-state intelligence side, together with the
moneyed part of the Democratic party, is out
to impeach him.
The constant sensationalized dribble of false or irrelevant claims
against him prepares the ground for that.
The
three fake-news examples above contain no news at
all. The bits exposed in them have no information value. Their only
purpose is to influence the readers by exaggerating outlandish claims
based on little, if any, real facts of minor importance.
This
full-throated propagandizing on all channels, without any critical
voices challenging the basic facts, is endangering the functioning of
democracy. The fourth estate is now just a tool to influence. It can
no longer claim to have any inherent value.
For
the average person one way out of this onslaught is to search for,
use and foster alternative and discerning sources of news. The other
is to give up.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.