Eight
Reasons Why Emmanuel Macron May Soon Regret His Victory
8
May, 2017
The
confetti were still littering Paris from Macron's celebration event
on Sunday night when the 39-year-old Frenchman became the youngest
president in French history, and already he met with one of the
biggest challenges facing his new administration: a population,
mostly among the local labor unions, that is unwilling to accept any
if not all of the proposed economic reforms, and made this abundantly
clear on Monday by clashing
in violent protests across
Paris with the local riot police.
That's
not the only reason why Emmanuel Macron may find the hangover of his
bitter fight with Marine Le Pen unpleasant. As The
Local writes,
while Macron's supporters were jumping for joy at the Louvre and
commentators all over the world were hailing Emmanuel Macron's
victory as a triumph for liberal and centrist values, a majority of
French people won't have seen it as a cause for celebration.
And
although Macron should be relieved, there are a few major reasons why
he should stay off the Champagne this week.
Below,
according to the French publication, are eight reasons why Macron has
little reason for celebration as he prepares to replace Francois
Hollande as the next French president.
1.
He didn't win over the majority of French people
In
the second round, 56 percent of French people either abstained, cast
a blank vote or voted for Le Pen. He may have won a majority of the
vote, but that doesn't make for a majority of French people.
Even in first round vote, when French people "vote with their
hearts" and choose the candidate they really want, Macron didn't
do spectacularly.
On
April 23rd some 8.6 million people voted for Macron, out of a
possible 47 million, so in reality, you could argue that only a 6th
of French voters would have Macron as their first choice. But even in
the first round he benefited from tactical voting.
2.
Many of those who voted for him aren't really behind him
Of
those who did vote for him, many said were doing so simply because he
wasn't Marine Le Pen. Some 33 percent of respondents in an Ipsos poll
said they voted Macron because they were won over by the political
renewal they saw in him.
Sixteen percent put his policies top of the
list, while 8 percent said his personality was the main reason they
voted for him.
However
the largest chunk, 43 percent, said they were mostly voting against
Le Pen.
3.
Le Pen is on the move too
The
far right scored a record number of votes in the first round (7.6
million) and then went and did it again in the second round, topping
the 10 million mark (10.6 million to be precise). The far right are
on an upward trajectory and Le Pen is hinting at a new rebranding and
strategy in her post-results speech. To be fair to Macron he
recognized this fact in his victory speech and vowed do everything to
stop people voting for extremes. Easier said than done in a
divided France suffering from unemployment.
4.
En Marche! will have a hard time getting a majority
Macron
will face a host of difficulties trying to gain a majority of seats
in the parliamentary elections with such a newly created party.
Without that he'll have a hard time passing the laws he wants.
The Republicans are gearing up to try and gain a majority in
parliament, in which case Macron would be reduced to not much more
than a figurehead of France's government.
Even
if En Marche! ends up the leading party, finding another group to
ally with to pass reforms will be a tough task. Macron's MP's will
face four clear blocks of opposition from Jean-Luc Melenchon's
'Unbowed' to whatever is left of the Socialist Party come June, to
the Republicans and Marine Le Pen's far right National Front.
That's
unprecedented in French politics. And on top of that, En Marche is
under-financed and unlike the long established parties, it doesn't
have a long-standing coffer to dip into.
5. Parts of the country rejected him
5. Parts of the country rejected him
Le
Pen's strongholds in the north east held firm, gaining 57.42 percent
of the vote in Calais and 61 percent in Hénin-Beaumont. In the Aisne
department, Le Pen came out on top in 619 out of 804 communes.
Le Pen scored well on France's Mediterranean coast in the south east,
getting close to 50 percent in many departments, like the Var, where
she gained 49 percent.
6.
He could be doomed to follow in Francois Hollande's footsteps
Macron
has a lot on his shoulders, knowing that if he fails to get results
on issues like unemployment during his five years he could see the
same fate as Hollande, who was so unpopular in France he became the
first French president not stand for a second term. Many French
people already see too much of a similarity between Macron and his
predecessor. Le Pen dubbed him "Hollande's baby" or
"Hollande's her".
Fail
to deal with unemployment and he will end up having more in common
with his predecessor than he would have wished.
7.
Unions are already on his back
Worker's
unions in France aren't about to let Macron forget the huge
opposition against him, despite the win. Already there have been
protests, with a demonstration against the election held at la
Republique in Paris on Monday organised by Front Sociale, a
collective of worker's unions and associations.
The
CGT's Michael Wamen said: “He is no an elected president, he is
like a president-CEO.”
If
Macron wants to reform labour laws - and he said he will do by decree
- then he can expect more uprisings in the months and years to come.
8.
His to do list
Has
an incoming president ever had so much on his to-do list from day
one? Macron must try to reconcile the country, cut unemployment,
restore faith in Europe, even reform the EU, boost the economy, deal
with the terror threat and dangerous jihadists returning from the
Middle East, find a way for France to be ease with Islam and
immigration, help forge a new identity for the country so it feels at
ease with its place in the world
In
other words make France feel great again.
Yikes,
Bonne Chance Manu!
RT coverage
Emmanuel
Clinton and the Revolt of the Elites
By
Pepe Escobar
May
08, 2017 "Information
Clearing House" - So in the end the West was
saved by the election of Emmanuel Macron as President of France:
relief in Brussels, a buoyant eurozone, rallies in Asian markets.
That
was always a no-brainer. After all, Macron was endorsed by the EU,
Goddess of the Market, and Barack Obama. And he was fully backed by
the French ruling class.
This
was a referendum on the EU – and the EU, in its current set-up,
won.
Cyberwar
had to be part of the picture. No one knows where the MacronLeaks
came from – a last minute, massive online dump of Macron campaign
hacked emails. WikiLeaks certified the documents it had time to
review as legitimate.
That
did not stop the Macron galaxy from immediately blaming it
on Russia. Le Monde, a once-great paper now owned
by three influential
Macron backers, faithfully mirrored his campaign’s denunciation of
RT and Sputnik, information technology attacks and, in general, the
interference of Russia in the elections.
The
Macron Russophobia in the French media-sphere also happens to include
Liberation, once the paper of Jean-Paul Sartre. Edouard de
Rothschild, the previous head of Rothschild & Cie Banque, bought
a 37% controlling stake in the paper in 2005. Three years later,
an unknown Emmanuel Macron started to rise in the mergers and
acquisitions department, soon acquiring a reputation as “the
Mozart of finance.”
After
a brief stint at the Ministry of Finance, a movement, En Marche! was
set up for him by a network of powerful players and think tanks. Now,
the presidency. Welcome to the revolving door, Moet &
Chandon-style.
See you on the barricades, babe
In
the last TV face-off with Marine Le Pen, Macron did not shy from
displaying condescending/rude streaks and even raked some extra
percentage points by hammering “Marine” as a misinformed,
corrupt, “hate-filled” nationalist liar who “feeds off France’s
misery” and would precipitate “civil war.”
That
may in fact come back to haunt him. Macron is bound to be a carrier
of France’s internal devaluation; a champion of wage “rigor,”
whose counterpoint will be a boom of under-employment; and a champion
of increasing precariousness on the road to boost competitiveness
Big
Business lauds his idea of cutting corporate tax from 33% to 25% (the
European average). But overall, what Macron has sold is a recipe for
a “see you on the barricades” scenario: severe cuts in health
spending, unemployment benefits and local government budgets; at
least 120,000 layoffs from the public sector; and abrogation of some
key workers’ rights. He wants to advance the “reform” of the
French work code – opposed by 67% of French voters – ruling by
decree.
On
Europe, the only thing “Marine” said during the campaign that was
closer to the truth was that “France will be led by a woman, either
me or Mrs Merkel.”
Macron
is more likely to be the new Tony Blair or, in a more disastrous
vein, the new [former Italian PM Matteo] Renzi.
The
real game starts now. Only 4 in 10 voters backed him. Abstention
reached 25% – about one-third if spoilt ballots are counted. It
will be virtually impossible for Macron to come up with a
parliamentary majority in the upcoming elections.
France
is now viciously divided into five blocks – with very little
uniting them:
Macron’s En Marche! movement; Marine Le Pen’s
National Front, which will be recomposed and expanded; Jean-Luc
Mélenchon’s Disobedient France, which is bound to lead a New Left;
the shattered Republicans, or the traditional French Right, which
badly needs a new leader after the François Fillon debacle; and the
virtually destroyed Socialists post-Hollande.
An Orwellian shock of the new
Contrary
to global perceptions, the biggest issue in this election was not
immigration, it was actually deep resentment towards the French deep
state (police, justice, administration) – perceived as oppressive,
corrupt and even violent.
Even
before the vote, the always sharp and delightfully provocative
philosopher Michel Onfray, author of Decadence, the best book of the
year and founder of the Popular University of Caen, identified some
of the main players behind the Macron bandwagon: the “bellicose”
philosopher Bernard-Henri Levy; Le Monde’s Pierre Bergé; Jacques
Attali – who almost single-handedly turned the Soclalists into
hardcore neoliberals; eminence grise Alain Minc; former MSF head
Bernard Kouchner; and former May 1968 stalwart Daniel Cohn-Bendit –
“In other words, the feral promoters of a liberal policy that
allowed Marine Le Pen to hit her highest score ever.”
All
of the above are faithful servants of the French deep state. I
have outlined in
Asia Times how the Macron hologram was manufactured. But to see how
the deep state managed to sell him, it’s essential to refer to
philosopher Jean-Claude Michea, a disciple of George Orwell and
Christopher Lasch, and author of the recently published Notre Ennemi,
Le Capital.
Michea
studies in detail how the Left has adopted all the values of what
Karl Popper dubbed “open society.” And how media spin doctors
molded the term “populism” to stigmatize the contemporary form of
Absolute Evil. Marine Le Pen was ostracized as “populist” –
while media propaganda always refused to note that National Front
voters (now 11 million) come from the “popular classes.”
Michea
emphasizes the original, historical meaning of “populism” in
Czarist Russia; a current within the socialist movement – much
admired by Marx and Engels – according to which peasants, artisans
and small entrepreneurs would have their place of honor in a
developed socialist economy. During May 1968 in France nobody would
have thought that populism could be equated with fascism. That only
happened in the beginning of the 1980s – as part of the new
Orwellian language of neoliberalism.
Michea
also notes that now it’s much easier to be a Left neoliberal than a
Right neoliberal; in France, these Left neoliberals belong to the
very closed circuit of the “Young Leaders” adopted by the French
American Foundation. French Big Business and high finance –
essentially, the French ruling class – immediately understood that
an Old Catholic Right candidate like François Fillon would never
fly; they needed a new brand for the same bottle.
Hence
Macron: a brilliant repackaging sold as change France can believe in,
as in a relatively soft approach to the “reforms” essential to
the survival of the neoliberal project.
What
French voters have – sort of – endorsed is the unity of
neoliberal economy and cultural liberalism. Call it, like Michea,
“integrated liberalism.” Or, with all the Orwellian overtones,
“post-democratic capitalism.”A true revolt of the elites. And
“peasants” buy it willingly. Let them eat overpriced croissants.
Once again, France is leading the West.
This
article was first published by Asia
Times
Here is coverage from Luke Rudkowskiof WeAreChange
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.