I’m
waiting to hear how PM Key is going to smooth talk his way out of
this one.
“At
the end of the day. China was never that important. We have the
Christchurch rebuild and the Auckland housing market”.
Radio NZ is more concerned about Samoa beating the All Blacks at rugby.They forgot to cover it (or they are't keeping an eye on news)
Keep
a watching eye out on this one
Radio NZ is more concerned about Samoa beating the All Blacks at rugby.They forgot to cover it (or they are't keeping an eye on news)
China stock markets continue nosedive as regulator warns of panic
Main
markets open sharply down as nearly 700 companies request their
shares be suspended in unprecedented move
8
July, 2015, 16.17 NZT (04.17 BST)
Chinese
stock markets tumbled again on Wednesday as investors shrugged off a
series of support measures by Chinese regulators, including the
central bank’s first public statement in support of the market
since it cut interest rates in late June.
Minutes
after opening, the Shanghai Composite Index fell by just over 8%.
while the Shenzhen Component was down almost 5%.
Within
ten minutes of trading, more than 1,000 shares across China’s two
stock markets had dropped by the daily limited of 10% and had their
shares automatically suspended. About 1,400 companies, or more than
half of those listed – filed for a trading halt in an attempt to
prevent further loses.
China’s
securities regulator said there was “panic” in the stock market
with irrational selling off increasing and “leading the stock
market to a situation of intense liquidity”.
The
People’s Bank of China said
it was assisting China’s Securities Finance Corporation (CSFC), the
national margin trading service provider, to acquire liquidity in an
effort to steady the stock market.
It
said it would do this through measures such as inter-bank lending,
mortgage financing and floating financial bonds. It said it would
keep a close watch on the market and continue to support the CSFC and
guard against systematic and financial risks.
A
spokesperson for China Securities Finance Corporation also said it
would purchase more shares of small- and medium-size listed
companies. It is these companies that have suffered the biggest loses.
Christopher
Balding, a professor of economics at Peking University said that
while it was not possible to know exactly why so many companies had
suspended trading, a large number were doing so because they had used
their own stock as collateral for loans and they want to “lock in
the value for the collateral”.
Ayako
Sera, a senior market economist at Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank in
Tokyo, said: “Today is all about China, with Greece in the
background now that it’s been given a new deadline.”
"Shanghai’s
early losses were like a cliff-dive, which had a huge impact on
investor sentiment.”
Previous
measures taken over the weekend by the Chinese government in an
attempt to stabilise the markets appeared to have been unsuccessful.
Analysts said the falls looked set to continue. Balding said: “I
don’t see it getting better. There is not going to be a turn around
within the next week or two.”
“It
probably has a long way to go. Margin loans basically rose much
faster and they are not falling nearly as fast, margin debt is not
falling nearly as fast as the market is falling. What that is telling
us is that there is a lot of stock that needs to be sold that hasn’t
been sold yet.”
China’s
stock markets had previously been among the top-performing in the
world, and had hit a seven-year peak in the middle of June. The
Shanghai stock market had surged more than 150% in 12 months, but it
has fallen 30% over the past three weeks – including a plunge of
12% last week.
Unlike
most other stock markets, where investors are mostly institutional
investors, in China, 80% of investors are small retail investors.
This is a concern for the Chinese government because it causes a
“political risk”, according to Balding. The losses on the stock
markets are going to cause a lot of people to lose money causing the
government to “worry about people protesting on the streets”, he
said.
Chinese
chaos worse than Greece
WHILE
the world worries about Greece, there’s an even bigger problem
closer to home: China.
7
July, 2015
A
stock market crash there has seen $3.2 trillion wiped from the value
of Chinese shares in just three weeks, triggering an emergency
response from the government and warnings of “monstrous” public
disorder.
And
the effects for Australia could be serious, affecting our key
commodity exports and sparking the beginning of a period of
recession-like conditions.
"State-owned
newspapers have used their strongest language yet, telling people
‘not to lose their minds’ and ‘not to bury themselves in horror
and anxiety’. [Our] positive measures will take time to produce
results,” writes
IG Markets.
“If
China does not find support today, the disorder could be monstrous.”
In
an extraordinary move, the People’s Bank of China has begun lending
money to investors to buy shares in the flailing market. The Wall
Street Journal reports this “liquidity
assistance”
will be provided to the regulator-owned China Securities Finance
Corp, which will lend the money to brokerages, which will in turn
lend to investors.
The
dramatic intervention marks the first time funds from the central
bank have been directed anywhere other than the banks, signalling
serious concern from authorities about the crisis.
At
the same time, Chinese authorities are putting a halt to any new
stock listings. The market regulator announced on Friday it would
limit initial public offerings — which disrupt the rest of the
market — in an attempt to curb plunging share prices.
While
the exact amount of assistance hasn’t been revealed,
the WSJ reports no upper limit has been set.
All
short-selling — the practice of betting that stocks will fall —
has been banned, and Chinese media has rushed to reassure citizens.
Yesterday,
shares in big state companies soared in response to the but many
others sank as jittery small investors tried to cut their losses,
Associated Press reports. The market benchmark Shanghai Composite
closed up 2.4 percent but still was down 27 percent from its June 12
peak.
Experts
fear it could turn into a full-blown crash introducing even more
uncertainty into global markets as Europe teeters on the edge of
a potential
eurozone exit by Greece,
after Sunday’s controversial
referendum.
WHAT
DOES IT MEAN FOR AUSTRALIA?
For
Australia, the market crash in China is likely to impact earnings on
key exports iron ore and coal, further slashing government revenue,
while also putting downward pressure on the Australian dollar.
Jordan
Eliseo, chief economist with ABC Bullion, said it was important to
remember that the amount of wealth Chinese citizens have tied up in
the stock market is relatively minor compared with western investors.
Stocks
only make up about 8 per cent of household wealth in China, compared
with around 20 per cent in developed nations.
"The
market crash there is generating headlines, but it’s not going to
have the same impact as a comparable crash would in a developed
market,” he said.
"What
it means for Australia, though, is it’s very clear there are some
serious imbalances in the Chinese economy, and the rate of growth
they’ve enjoyed in the past is over. There’s no question our
export earnings are going to take another hit.”
Mr
Eliseo predicts Australia is likely to experience “recession-like”
conditions such as negative wage growth for many years to come. “I
believe that’s going to be the new norm,” he said.
WHAT
ARE THEY DOING ABOUT IT?
On
Saturday, China’s 21 largest brokerage firms announced that they
would invest more than $25.35 billion in the country’s stock
markets to curb the declines.
The
brokers will spend at least 120 billion yuan ($25.75 billion) on
so-called “blue chip” exchange traded funds, the Securities
Association of China said in a statement after an emergency meeting
in Beijing.
On
Friday the Shanghai Composite Index closed down 5.77 per cent to end
at 3,686.92 points. Since peaking on June 12 Shanghai has dropped
nearly 29 per cent, which Bloomberg News said was its biggest
three-week fall since November 1992.
The
Shanghai market had swelled by 150 per cent in the last 12 months and
experts had expected a sharp correction, though the rate at which it
has occurred is unnerving many.
Middle-class
Chinese investors, encouraged by the government, have been pumping
money into the stock market. The WSJ quoted 51-year-old Li Ping, who
sold her 7 million yuan ($1.5 million) Beijing apartment to plough 4
million yuan into stocks.
Ms
Li said she thought the market would stabilise and rise again. “The
fund that I have invested in is very mature and professional,” she
said.
CRACKDOWN
AS PANIC TRIGGERS ‘SUICIDE’ RUMOURS
Underscoring
growing jitters amid the three-week sell-off, police in Beijing
detained a man on Sunday for allegedly spreading a rumour online that
a person jumped to their death in the city’s financial district due
to China’s precarious stock markets.
The
29-year-old man detained was identified by the surname Tian, and is a
manager at a technology and science company in Beijing, police said
in a post on their official microblog.
Police
said Tian’s alleged posting of the rumour took place Friday and
called on internet users to obey laws and regulations, not to believe
and spread rumours, and to cooperate with police.
The
state-run Xinhua news agency reported that Tian allegedly posted the
rumours with video clips and screenshots Friday afternoon.
The
post, which is said to have gone viral, “provoked emotional
responses among stock investors who suffered losses over the past
weeks”, Xinhua said.
Xinhua
added that a police investigation showed that the video in question
had been shot on Friday morning in the eastern Chinese province of
Jiangsu where a man had jumped to his death. Local police there were
investigating that case, Xinhua said.
The
original post was unavailable Sunday on China’s tightly controlled
social media, where authorities are quick to delete controversial
material.
Main
markets open sharply down as nearly 700 companies request their
shares be suspended in unprecedented move
8
July, 2015, 16.17 NZT (04.17 BST)
Chinese
stock markets tumbled again on Wednesday as investors shrugged off a
series of support measures by Chinese regulators, including the
central bank’s first public statement in support of the market
since it cut interest rates in late June.
Minutes
after opening, the Shanghai Composite Index fell by just over 8%.
while the Shenzhen Component was down almost 5%.
Within
ten minutes of trading, more than 1,000 shares across China’s two
stock markets had dropped by the daily limited of 10% and had their
shares automatically suspended. About 1,400 companies, or more than
half of those listed – filed for a trading halt in an attempt to
prevent further loses.
China’s
securities regulator said there was “panic” in the stock market
with irrational selling off increasing and “leading the stock
market to a situation of intense liquidity”.
The
People’s Bank of China said
it was assisting China’s Securities Finance Corporation (CSFC), the
national margin trading service provider, to acquire liquidity in an
effort to steady the stock market.
It
said it would do this through measures such as inter-bank lending,
mortgage financing and floating financial bonds. It said it would
keep a close watch on the market and continue to support the CSFC and
guard against systematic and financial risks.
A
spokesperson for China Securities Finance Corporation also said it
would purchase more shares of small- and medium-size listed
companies. It is these companies that have suffered the biggest loses.
Christopher
Balding, a professor of economics at Peking University said that
while it was not possible to know exactly why so many companies had
suspended trading, a large number were doing so because they had used
their own stock as collateral for loans and they want to “lock in
the value for the collateral”.
Ayako
Sera, a senior market economist at Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank in
Tokyo, said: “Today is all about China, with Greece in the
background now that it’s been given a new deadline.”
"Shanghai’s
early losses were like a cliff-dive, which had a huge impact on
investor sentiment.”
Previous
measures taken over the weekend by the Chinese government in an
attempt to stabilise the markets appeared to have been unsuccessful.
Analysts said the falls looked set to continue. Balding said: “I
don’t see it getting better. There is not going to be a turn around
within the next week or two.”
“It
probably has a long way to go. Margin loans basically rose much
faster and they are not falling nearly as fast, margin debt is not
falling nearly as fast as the market is falling. What that is telling
us is that there is a lot of stock that needs to be sold that hasn’t
been sold yet.”
China’s
stock markets had previously been among the top-performing in the
world, and had hit a seven-year peak in the middle of June. The
Shanghai stock market had surged more than 150% in 12 months, but it
has fallen 30% over the past three weeks – including a plunge of
12% last week.
Unlike
most other stock markets, where investors are mostly institutional
investors, in China, 80% of investors are small retail investors.
This is a concern for the Chinese government because it causes a
“political risk”, according to Balding. The losses on the stock
markets are going to cause a lot of people to lose money causing the
government to “worry about people protesting on the streets”, he
said.
To save its stock markets, China is putting its whole financial system at risk
7
Juloy, 2015
“We
must deepen economic system reform by centering on the decisive role
of the market in allocating resources….”
— President Xi
Jinping, “The
Decision” of the Third Plenum,
Nov. 2013
That was the
plan, anyway. Not anymore.
In
recent days, the Chinese government unfurled
a series of measuresto
stop its stock markets’ free-fall the scale of which has never
before been seen. It is essentially giving investors a “Xi Jinping
put,” as Joyce Poon of Gavekal Dragonomics calls it (referring to
Mario Draghi’s European Central Bank put) in a note today—meaning,
the government is assuring investors it will do what it has to to
keep the market aloft.
The
measures stanched the bleeding a bit today (July 6); Shanghai
Composite closed up 2.4%. However, much more is at stake than hitting
numbers. Not only does the Xi Jinping put threaten to scuttle
critical financial reforms; it also leaves China—and untold
millions of its residents—in a bigger financial mess than ever.
7
Juloy, 2015
“We
must deepen economic system reform by centering on the decisive role
of the market in allocating resources….”
— President Xi
Jinping, “The
Decision” of the Third Plenum,
Nov. 2013
That was the
plan, anyway. Not anymore.
In
recent days, the Chinese government unfurled
a series of measuresto
stop its stock markets’ free-fall the scale of which has never
before been seen. It is essentially giving investors a “Xi Jinping
put,” as Joyce Poon of Gavekal Dragonomics calls it (referring to
Mario Draghi’s European Central Bank put) in a note today—meaning,
the government is assuring investors it will do what it has to to
keep the market aloft.
The
measures stanched the bleeding a bit today (July 6); Shanghai
Composite closed up 2.4%. However, much more is at stake than hitting
numbers. Not only does the Xi Jinping put threaten to scuttle
critical financial reforms; it also leaves China—and untold
millions of its residents—in a bigger financial mess than ever.
China’s intervention is far bigger than TARP
First
some perspective on this weekend’s activities. The most important
of the salmagundi of actions is the security regulator’s promise of
an initial 120 billion yuan ($19.3 billion) via 21 brokerages to
stabilize the market, alongside the People’s Bank of China’s
agreement to provide liquidity support for the margin-trading
clearinghouse—what David Cui, strategist at Bank of America/Merrill
Lynch, says might be its first step toward becoming the ailing
market’s buyer of last resort.
The
government also vowed to make sure the Shanghai Composite hits 4,500.
The scope of this gambit is breathtaking, says Anne Stevenson-Yang,
founder of J Capital Research. She notes that analysts comparing
China’s current rescue efforts to Troubled Asset Relieve Program,
the US government’s 2008 bank bailout package, miss the fact that
TARP rescued operating companies, not a stock index. “[TARP]
focused on the viability of operating companies, not the optics that
a speculative derivative of the economy represented.”
“There
is no way to characterize these measures other than as a ‘double or
nothing’ wager,” Stevenson-Yang writes in a note today.
First
some perspective on this weekend’s activities. The most important
of the salmagundi of actions is the security regulator’s promise of
an initial 120 billion yuan ($19.3 billion) via 21 brokerages to
stabilize the market, alongside the People’s Bank of China’s
agreement to provide liquidity support for the margin-trading
clearinghouse—what David Cui, strategist at Bank of America/Merrill
Lynch, says might be its first step toward becoming the ailing
market’s buyer of last resort.
The
government also vowed to make sure the Shanghai Composite hits 4,500.
The scope of this gambit is breathtaking, says Anne Stevenson-Yang,
founder of J Capital Research. She notes that analysts comparing
China’s current rescue efforts to Troubled Asset Relieve Program,
the US government’s 2008 bank bailout package, miss the fact that
TARP rescued operating companies, not a stock index. “[TARP]
focused on the viability of operating companies, not the optics that
a speculative derivative of the economy represented.”
“There
is no way to characterize these measures other than as a ‘double or
nothing’ wager,” Stevenson-Yang writes in a note today.
The party is gambling away its credibility
The
downside of that wager is profound indeed. The government’s
creation of the Chinese bull market has disproportionately benefitted
state-owned companies—and therefore the Communist Party—by
replacing government-guaranteed debt with equity. That equity, of
course, has been funded by the little guy—the second, and much
bigger, part of the problem. When the state press and government
officials began pumping stocks about a year ago, they essentially
made a promise to protect the savings of tens of millions of
households.
However,
the stated strategy might leave them high and dry, says Andrew
Collier, head of Orient Capital Research. Given the intensity of
Beijing behind the operations, the liquidity the PBoC provides to the
market via brokerages is likely to be many times larger than the
announced 120 billion yuan.
“[The
government] will have to focus on the indices and the big cap
[companies] to affect the market, which will completely leave out the
small caps that retail investors have been buying,” Collier tells
Quartz. “If these stocks fall, there will be a lot of protesting
unhappy investors. More problems for the leadership. They can support
it short-term but not long-term.”
The
downside of that wager is profound indeed. The government’s
creation of the Chinese bull market has disproportionately benefitted
state-owned companies—and therefore the Communist Party—by
replacing government-guaranteed debt with equity. That equity, of
course, has been funded by the little guy—the second, and much
bigger, part of the problem. When the state press and government
officials began pumping stocks about a year ago, they essentially
made a promise to protect the savings of tens of millions of
households.
However,
the stated strategy might leave them high and dry, says Andrew
Collier, head of Orient Capital Research. Given the intensity of
Beijing behind the operations, the liquidity the PBoC provides to the
market via brokerages is likely to be many times larger than the
announced 120 billion yuan.
“[The
government] will have to focus on the indices and the big cap
[companies] to affect the market, which will completely leave out the
small caps that retail investors have been buying,” Collier tells
Quartz. “If these stocks fall, there will be a lot of protesting
unhappy investors. More problems for the leadership. They can support
it short-term but not long-term.”
The more China stokes risk-taking, the more painful it will be to withdraw government support
Then
there’s what this means for reform. The quote above is the most
celebrated of Xi’s much-vaunted Third Plenum policy metamorphosis:
to let markets—and not government policy—determine the value of
money and risk.
These
reforms were ostensibly important to Xi at one point because,
ultimately, China’s miracle is getting risky and expensive to
maintain. When the government deems an enormous swath of China’s
economy—e.g. the property market, state-owned companies, financial
products, now the stock market—Too Big to Fail, it encourages
wanton risk-taking. If the investment pans out, big returns; if not,
no worries—you’ll be bailed out. That’s become very expensive;
China has racked up at least $28 trillion in debt, more than half of
which is corporate.
The
more wanton risk-taking there is, the more it will cost, both
financially and politically, when the government begins removing its
support, letting the market do its job.
Then
there’s what this means for reform. The quote above is the most
celebrated of Xi’s much-vaunted Third Plenum policy metamorphosis:
to let markets—and not government policy—determine the value of
money and risk.
These
reforms were ostensibly important to Xi at one point because,
ultimately, China’s miracle is getting risky and expensive to
maintain. When the government deems an enormous swath of China’s
economy—e.g. the property market, state-owned companies, financial
products, now the stock market—Too Big to Fail, it encourages
wanton risk-taking. If the investment pans out, big returns; if not,
no worries—you’ll be bailed out. That’s become very expensive;
China has racked up at least $28 trillion in debt, more than half of
which is corporate.
The
more wanton risk-taking there is, the more it will cost, both
financially and politically, when the government begins removing its
support, letting the market do its job.
The government-induced stock rally puts a lot more people at risk
Chinese
stocks are a good example of this. Politically, when the government
decided to create the stock rally, Xi and the Communist Party put
their credibility on the line with more people than ever before. Past
policy decisions might outrage a region, or an interest group, but
usually not millions of households across China.
Financially,
hundreds of billions of borrowed
yuan have flowed into equities.
If that wealth is lost, those debts can’t be repaid—which is why
the government-rigged Chinese stock rally may have left the whole
financial system at risk, says Orient Capital’s Collier.
“The
real danger in all this may be the banks,” he says. “They have an
undetermined exposure in loans to the stock market, directly to
consumers or indirectly through intermediaries, such as the shadow
banking sector (e.g. trusts). A collapse in share prices could have a
strong negative effect on bank balance sheets.”
Chinese
stocks are a good example of this. Politically, when the government
decided to create the stock rally, Xi and the Communist Party put
their credibility on the line with more people than ever before. Past
policy decisions might outrage a region, or an interest group, but
usually not millions of households across China.
Financially,
hundreds of billions of borrowed
yuan have flowed into equities.
If that wealth is lost, those debts can’t be repaid—which is why
the government-rigged Chinese stock rally may have left the whole
financial system at risk, says Orient Capital’s Collier.
“The
real danger in all this may be the banks,” he says. “They have an
undetermined exposure in loans to the stock market, directly to
consumers or indirectly through intermediaries, such as the shadow
banking sector (e.g. trusts). A collapse in share prices could have a
strong negative effect on bank balance sheets.”
The government may be too late to change course
There’s
still a chance to keep reform on track, argues Gavekal’s Poon. The
volatility of the last few weeks will alert China’s leaders to
these systemic vulnerabilities, she writes, prompting them to
accelerate economic and financial reform.
JCap’s
Stevenson-Yang is less optimistic.
“Chinese
institutions are too outdated, too inflexible, too lacking in
coordination to be of any use when the one thing the government can
do—aggregate and direct flows of money—is undermined as a tool,”
she says. “The sell-off is similar to a bank run, in which each
player’s only real motive is to capture as much of the value of his
assets as possible before the whole edifice collapses.”
China’s
plunging stock markets have virtually shut down
As
China’s steepest market drop in decades continues, over
half of
all listed companies in China had voluntarily suspended trading of
their shares by midday on July 8, and about 800
others had
their stocks automatically halted after reaching their daily drop
limit. The benchmark Shanghai Composite Index was down 4.2% and the
CSI 300 was down 4.9% in morning trading.
That
leaves only a handful—just 22%, according to our calculations, of
all listed stocks on the Chinese stock market still trading. Dozens
of stocks in Hong Kong have also voluntarily
suspended trading in
the past few hours, as the spill-over from China’s market drags
down Hong Kong’s Hang
Seng Index:
Companies
listed in China and Hong Kong can apply to stop trading ahead of the
release of market-moving news—most of the companies that applied
for a suspension said they had an “important
project in preparation”
and would make an announcement over the next five days. Most analysts
believe companies are just hoping to ride out the market slump.
Investors
wondering when these stocks might start trading again can take
a look at Hanergy Thin Film Power,
which stopped traded in Hong Kong in May after its stock started
falling—and has not yet restarted.
“Greed
and fear,” Michael Every, head of financial markets research at
Rabobank Group told
Bloomberg.
“If you hadn’t been greedy you have nothing to fear now. We are
heading to 2,500,” he said, referring to the Shanghai Composite
Index, which was at 3582.5 at noon on July 8.
Chinese
regulators and the central bank, which have already numerous
measures to
try to prop up the markets, are rolling out more. The China
Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) said today it would increase
purchases of shares in
small and medium cap stocks,
after criticism that it was only supporting
large state-owned companies.
Those
measures aren’t likely to stem the bleeding. After reaching a
seven-year peak and the longest running bull market since the market
opened in 1990, Chinese stocks have been on a nosedive and, thanks to
a huge amount of borrowing to buy stocks in the run-up, may still
fall further.
About $3.4 trillion in value of listed companies has disappeared over
the past few weeks.
There’s
still a chance to keep reform on track, argues Gavekal’s Poon. The
volatility of the last few weeks will alert China’s leaders to
these systemic vulnerabilities, she writes, prompting them to
accelerate economic and financial reform.
JCap’s
Stevenson-Yang is less optimistic.
“Chinese
institutions are too outdated, too inflexible, too lacking in
coordination to be of any use when the one thing the government can
do—aggregate and direct flows of money—is undermined as a tool,”
she says. “The sell-off is similar to a bank run, in which each
player’s only real motive is to capture as much of the value of his
assets as possible before the whole edifice collapses.”
China’s
plunging stock markets have virtually shut down
As
China’s steepest market drop in decades continues, over
half of
all listed companies in China had voluntarily suspended trading of
their shares by midday on July 8, and about 800
others had
their stocks automatically halted after reaching their daily drop
limit. The benchmark Shanghai Composite Index was down 4.2% and the
CSI 300 was down 4.9% in morning trading.
That
leaves only a handful—just 22%, according to our calculations, of
all listed stocks on the Chinese stock market still trading. Dozens
of stocks in Hong Kong have also voluntarily
suspended trading in
the past few hours, as the spill-over from China’s market drags
down Hong Kong’s Hang
Seng Index:
Companies
listed in China and Hong Kong can apply to stop trading ahead of the
release of market-moving news—most of the companies that applied
for a suspension said they had an “important
project in preparation”
and would make an announcement over the next five days. Most analysts
believe companies are just hoping to ride out the market slump.
Investors
wondering when these stocks might start trading again can take
a look at Hanergy Thin Film Power,
which stopped traded in Hong Kong in May after its stock started
falling—and has not yet restarted.
“Greed
and fear,” Michael Every, head of financial markets research at
Rabobank Group told
Bloomberg.
“If you hadn’t been greedy you have nothing to fear now. We are
heading to 2,500,” he said, referring to the Shanghai Composite
Index, which was at 3582.5 at noon on July 8.
Chinese
regulators and the central bank, which have already numerous
measures to
try to prop up the markets, are rolling out more. The China
Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) said today it would increase
purchases of shares in
small and medium cap stocks,
after criticism that it was only supporting
large state-owned companies.
Those
measures aren’t likely to stem the bleeding. After reaching a
seven-year peak and the longest running bull market since the market
opened in 1990, Chinese stocks have been on a nosedive and, thanks to
a huge amount of borrowing to buy stocks in the run-up, may still
fall further.
About $3.4 trillion in value of listed companies has disappeared over
the past few weeks.
Huge loss happened to chinese stock market, it really shocked us. By the way, I need some tips for SGX stock trading market.
ReplyDeleteChina needs extended fiscal stimulus to resurrect its frail economy, says Jamie Fahy, analyst, Global Macro Strategy & Asset allocation at Citi who sees PBOC's rate cut late on Wednesday as "not enough." Fahy also thinks China's exchange rate is extremely overvalued and real interest rates within China very high. Read more... http://www.majorgainz.com/news/MarketDetail/China-needs-more-cuts-bearish-on-EMs-like-DMs-Citi-.aspx
ReplyDeleteThanks!
ReplyDeleteThe Chinese stock market has been fueled by an inflationary real estate market in China. The Zombie banks and shadow banking have created an mythical safety net for investors. The only solution is to deleverage the real estate assets and zombie banks. This collapse of the financial structure will lead to a Chinese depression. The collateral damage is the impact on commodity based nations with export revenues falling. The investment solution is a etf short of the market.
ReplyDelete