IMF Rejects Greek Bailout Package, Widening European Rift On Greece
30
July, 2015
The
International Monetary Fund (IMF) has determined it cannot offer
funding toward a third bailout for Greece, citing
astronomical levels of debt and a poor record of government
follow-through on reforms.
The
evaluation, reported by Financial
Times on Thursday, throws the Europewide political effort to
save financially troubled Greece into doubt. Influential German
officials have made clear that no bailout would be possible without
IMF participation. Without a bailout, Greece faces the prospect of
having to exit the eurozone, a prospect that commentators
have called the Grexit.
While
the IMF will continue to participate in bailout talks currently
taking place in Athens, Greece, it will be months before the lender
will be able to agree to a new program. IMF bylaws stipulate that the
institution cannot make loans when the country receiving them lacks
the capacity to make reforms or can't sustain its debt.
According
to documents obtained by Financial Times, IMF determined that Greece
failed to meet either of those expectations. A previous
IMF paper called Greece's debt "highly unsustainable."
In
order to receive its third bailout in five years, this time projected
at around $94 billion, Greece would need approval from the three
institutions that make up the so-called troika: the European
Union's governing body, the European Central Bank and the IMF.
IMF
chief Christine Lagarde has previously made clear that no
deal is possible without deep debt relief, potentially
in the form of a write-down of Greece's liabilities. That stance
clashes with that of Germany, the largest economic power in
the eurozone, whose finance minister Wolfgang Schäuble has
consistently demanded that Greece's overall debt remain
intact.
But
as Greece's former finance minister Yanis Varoufakis has
said, the IMF and Schäuble may indeed share a common view:
"They don’t want this deal to go ahead."
Still,
negotiators face a hard Aug. 20 deadline to hammer out some form of
financing that will keep Greek banks and businesses open until the
country can make an economic turnaround. In late June, the European
Central Bank capped its financing to Greece, forcing Athens to
close its central bank and sending the country's economy into
a tailspin.
The
political situation in Greece, meanwhile, offers scant comfort
to creditors. Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras faces internal opposition
within his left-wing Syriza party, which came to power in January on
an anti-austerity platform. After six months of brinksmanship and
political provocation, Tsipras accepted austerity-inducing reforms
earlier this month, leading to a raft of resignations from the
radical wing of the party.
That
instability, together with the sheer size of Greece's existing debt,
has made IMF member states wary of launching into another bailout.
According to the board meeting minutes acquired by Financial Times,
non-European board members stressed the need for Lagarde to "protect
the reputation of the Fund."
Will the IMF throw the spanner in the works? – as I feared and Dr Schäuble hoped?
30
July, 2015
IMF cannot join Greek rescue, board told
… reports
Peter Spiegel from Brussels in today’s Financial
Times.
He adds:“Some
Greek officials suspect the IMF and Wolfgang Schäuble, the hardline
German finance minister, are determined to scupper a Greek rescue
despite this month’s agreement to move forward with a third
bailout.
In
a private teleconference made public this week, Yanis Varoufakis, the
former finance minister, said he feared the Greek government would
pass new rounds of economic reforms only for the IMF to pull the plug
on the programme later this year.
“According
to its own rules, the IMF cannot participate in any new bailout. I
mean, they’ve already violated their rules twice to do so, but I
don’t think they will do it a third time,” Mr Varoufakis said.
“Dr Schäuble and the IMF have a common interest: they don’t want
this deal to go head.”
The
key issue, of course, is not so much whether the IMF will be part of
the deal – a typical fudge could, for instance, be concocted with
the IMF providing ‘technical assistance’ to an ESM-only program.
The
issue is whether the promised debt relief which, astonishingly will
be discussed only after the new loan agreement is signed and sealed,
will prove adequate – assuming it is granted at all. Or
whether, as I very much fear, the debt relief will be too little
while the austerity involved proves catastrophically large.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.