Arctic Methane Alert — Ramp-Up at Numerous Reporting Stations Shows Signature of an Amplifying Feedback
1
June, 2015
Over
the past few months, reporting stations around the Arctic have shown
a ramping rate of atmospheric methane accumulation. The curves in the
graphs are steepening, hinting at a growing release of methane from a
warming Arctic environment.
*
* * *
(Alert,
Canada methane graph shows atmospheric methane increases in the range
of 20 parts per billion in just one year. This rate of increase is
2-3 times the global average for the past five years. A
skyrocketing rate of increase.
Image source: NOAA
ESRL.)
A
Massive Thawing Carbon Store in the Far North
The
science is pretty settled. There’s a massive store of ancient
carbon now thawing in the Arctic.
In
the land-based permafrost alone, this store is in the range of 1.3
billion tons — or nearly double the volume in the atmosphere right
now. Arctic Ocean methane hydrates in the East Siberian Arctic Shelf
add another 500 billion tons. A rather vulnerable store that does not
include hundreds of billions of additional tons of carbon in the
deeper methane hydrates around the Arctic in places like the Gakkel
Ridge, in the Deep Waters off Svalbard, or in the Nares Strait.
Massive carbon stores of high global warming potential gas locked in
frozen ground or in ice structure upon or beneath the sea bed.
But
now human beings — through fossil fuel emissions — are dumping
heat trapping gasses into the atmosphere at an unprecedented rate.
These gasses are most efficient at trapping heat in the colder,
darker regions of the world. And, due to a combination of massive
Northern Hemisphere burning, and release from the Arctic carbon
stores themselves, the highest concentrations of greenhouse gasses
can be found exactly where they are needed least — in the world’s
far northern zones .
(The
Arctic consistently shows an overburden of methane gas — both at
the ground and upper levels of the atmosphere as seen in this METOP
graphic from
May 29. Such an overburden is but one of many proxy indicators of a
ramping rate of release.)
This
accumulation and overburden of heat trapping gasses is causing the
Arctic to rapidly warm. A rate of warming (now at half a degree
Celsius per decade for most regions) that is providing a heat forcing
pushing the ancient carbon stores to release. A heat forcing now
greater than at any time in the past 150,000 years (and likely more
due to the fact that the Eemian Arctic was rather cool overall). A
heat forcing rapidly ramping toward at least a range not seen since
major glaciation began in the Northern Hemisphere 2-3 million years
ago.
The
problem for science, then, is two-fold. First, as oceans warm and
permafrost thaws, how rapidly will the carbon stores release? And,
second, how much of that carbon store will release as CO2, and how
much will release as methane? From the point of view of global
warming, both CO2 and Methane emissions feedback is a bad outcome of
human-forced warming. But methane, which has a global warming
potential of between 25 and 120 times CO2 over human-relevant
timescales, has a real potential to make an already bad human heating
of the Earth System much, much worse.
Most
Arctic Reporting Stations Show Rapid Ramping of Methane Gas
Accumulation
For
this reason, monitoring methane gas accumulation in the Arctic is a
key feature of global climate change risk analysis. If the Arctic
shows a spiking rate of methane accumulation, then the carbon stores
are more susceptible to rapid release of potent heat trapping gasses
and we are facing a high urgency situation in need of rapid global
response.
Over
the past decade, the Arctic has shown numerous isolated or regional
spikes to very high methane levels with an overall continued
accumulation within the atmosphere. The Arctic also displayed a major
overburden of both methane and CO2 — proxy indications of local
carbon store feedbacks already ongoing on a minor-to-moderate scale.
This combination of overburden and spikes provided a troubling
context, especially when adding in observations of methane store
release through thermokarst lakes and, later, blow-holes in locations
like Yamal, Russia. But up until last year, we had not seen a third,
and more troubling, indicator — the ramping rates of atmospheric
methane accumulation that would be an early warning that the Arctic
carbon store was indeed starting to blow its stack.
But
now, that signal is starting to show up at almost every Arctic
reporting station. A steepening curve in the Arctic atmospheric
methane graphs. A signal we really, really don’t want to be bearing
witness to:
(Major
reporting stations from Svalbard to Barrow show a ramping atmospheric
methane accumulation [Click on individual images to expand]. It’s a
signal that is yet one more indicator of an amplifying methane and
greenhouse gas feedback to human warming now going on in the Arctic.
Images provided by NOAA
ESRL.)
Now,
it seems, at the very least, we are witnessing a spike in Arctic
atmospheric methane accumulation. Let’s hope it’s just a spike
and not the start of another ugly exponential curve associated with
human-forced atmospheric warming. But if we are witnessing the early
ramp of such a curve, we should be clear that we are now in the
context of a worst-case climate change scenario.
Hot-Button
Topic of Critical Importance
For
years, conjecture over the possible rate of Arctic Methane release in
a human-warmed Arctic has been the source of extreme scientific and
media-based controversy. Major oil companies have used the issue as
an excuse to continue fossil fuel burning (irresponsibly spreading
the meme — ‘we’re screwed, so we may as well just keep burning
anyway’). Major climate scientists and related media outlets have
sought to tamp down concern over large-scale methane release by
issuing articles with titles like ‘Apocalypse Not’ with many
generally insisting that there is practically zero likelihood of a
large-scale methane release or major amplifying feedback. Meanwhile,
the observational studies have continued to indicate risk of at least
moderate and possibly strong methane feedback in an age of rapid
human heating of the Arctic environment (studies like this
recent paper which observed microbes tripling the rate of methane gas
release in thermokarst lakes as a response to Arctic temperature
increase.)
Finally, a group of very concerned observational scientists like
Natalia Shakhova, Igor Simeletov and Peter Wadhams have warned that a
large-scale methane release is likely imminent and begs a major
response from the global community (sadly, many of these proposed
responses have come in the form of geo-engineering — methods which
are far less likely to succeed and far more likely to generate
unforeseen and highly disruptive consequences than simple cessation
of human fossil fuel emission and a transition to carbon-negative
civilizations).
(Mauna
Loa methane measure through June 1, 2015 shows that lower Latitude
regions are also starting to follow a ramping rate of increase. Image
source: NOAA
ESRL.)
All
this controversy aside, what we observe now is the following:
- Arctic methane and CO2 overburden — proxy indication of environmental release.
- Increasing rates of release, indications of increasing release, or possibly increasing release from single sources such as thermokarst lakes, peat bogs, wildfires, and sea bed hydrates and submerged tundra.
- A multiplication of observed or discovered methane release sources — thermokarst lakes, methane blow holes, wildfires etc.
- A ramping rate of atmospheric methane accumulation at reporting stations throughout the Arctic (most but not all stations).
- A ramping rate of atmospheric methane accumulation from global proxy monitors like Mauna Loa and in the global atmospheric average.
Together,
these observations represent a troubling trend that, should it
continue, will be proceeding along or near a worst-case climate
sensitivity track. As such, these new ramping rates of increase in
Arctic atmospheric monitors are a very unfortunate indicator.
Links:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.