Hackers
Threaten to Leak 9/11 Files That Will ‘Top Snowden’s Finest Work’
2
January, 2019
The
same hackers that released episodes of a yet-to-be-aired Netflix
series and hacked major networks such as ABC, NBC, and HBO say that
gigabytes of highly-confidential material they stole from a law firm
could shed more light on the biggest terror act in American history.
The
Dark Overlord, an international hacker group, have
announced that
they have stolen a trove of undisclosed information regarding
the 9/11 attacks — and they are ready to release it
unless they do not receive ransom money, denominated in Bitcoins.
The
group, infamously known for leaking, in 2017, episodes
of the hit Netflix series Orange is the New Black, say that they
have hacked an unnamed US-based law firm. When looking through the
stolen cache of data, they found "hundreds of gigabytes
of litigation-related documents", including a total
of 18,000 e-mails, non-disclosure agreements, expert witness
testimonies, and communications with government officials.
The
hacked law firm is said to have paid a "satisfactory"
amount of money to the Dark Overlord but also
contacted law enforcement officials — a move that drew the
hackers' ire.
The
cyber thieves teased that the release of this data would
outshine "both in volume and impact" Edward Snowden's
leak of documents on extensive internet and phone
surveillance in the US. "We'll guarantee to all our
astute readers that the subsequent release of these materials
will generate millions of news articles and result in the
biggest and most significant data breach ever to have occurred."
According
to the Dark Overlord, the stolen data was also related to the
insurance market Lloyds of London and the real estate and
investment firm Silverstein Properties. Part of the litigation,
as per the statement, also involves sensitive information
from such American federal agencies as the FBI, CIA,
Transport Security Administration, Federal Aviation Administration
and Department of Defence, which has not been published for the
sake of national security.
The
hackers have published a small part of the data from the
trove containing information about settlements and the
correspondence of the law firm Husch Blackwell, which
represented the interests of American Airlines' contractor. They
did not name the price for the loot, but said that the docs
may be available to everyone, from terrorists to US'
diplomatic rivals.
"If
a full public release happens in the near future, we'll
guarantee that we're going to withhold only the most highly
confidential and sensitive documents for private sale. For the
rest of you: don't worry, there's [sic] thousands of documents
still to go around".
The
documents in question are stored in an encrypted archive,
which consists of five layers, with Layer 1 being the most
innocuous and Layer 5 the most hard-hitting stuff. Entities and
individuals involved in post-9/11 investigations are able
to obtain sensitive documents in which they are mentioned
by paying a ransom.
"And
finally, a message to the companies directly involved to include
the airlines, government agencies, the dozens of solicitor
firms, the insurers, and the many others, this is a message directly
to you: pay the f*ck up, or we're going to bury you
with this. If you continue to fail us, we'll escalate these
releases by releasing the keys, each time a Layer is opened, a
new wave of liability will fall upon you."
2
January, 2019
The
FBI is investigating the theft of 18,000 documents related to the
September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center by a hacking
collective known as The Dark Overlord, according to FT,
citing two people familiar with the matter.
Posting under the name “The Dark Overlord”, the hacker or hackers claimed on New Year’s Eve that they had taken emails and non-disclosure agreements relating to the 9/11 attacks that were sent and received by groups including insurers Hiscox and Lloyd’s of London and the law firm Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin, now called Husch Blackwell.
The Dark Overlord said it would sell the documents for bitcoin, inviting Isis, al-Qaeda and nation states to bid for them online. -FT
"Pay
the fuck up, or we're going to bury you with this. If you continue to
fail us, we'll escalate these releases by releasing the keys, each
time a Layer is opened, a new wave of liability will fall upon you,"
reads the hacking group's demand letter.
"If
you're one of the dozens of solicitor firms who was involved in the
litigation, a politician who was involved in the case, a law
enforcement agency who was involved in the investigations, a property
management firm, an investment bank, a client of a client, a
reference of a reference, a global insurer, or whoever else, you're
welcome to contact our e-mail below and make a request to formally
have your documents and materials withdrawn from any eventual public
release of the materials. However, you'll be paying us," the
note continues.
Images
of some of the documents began circulating on Wednesday after the
group released decryption keys, which appear to show communications
related to the World Trade Center.
The
FBI is one of multiple law-enforcement agencies who are now
investigating the breach, according to FT. The
Dark Overlord, meanwhile, says that it has been under investigation
for years, and that it had also gathered other information from
Lloyd's and Silverstein Properties - founded by former WTC owner
Larry Silverstein.
Hiscox
insurance said it became aware of the hack last April.
"The
law firm’s systems are not connected to Hiscox’s IT
infrastructure and Hiscox’s own systems were unaffected by this
incident," said a Hiscox spokesperson. "One of the cases
the law firm handled for Hiscox and other insurers related to
litigation arising from the events of 9/11, and we believe that
information relating to this was stolen during that breach."
"We
will continue to work with law enforcement in both the UK and US on
this matter," added the spokesperson.
The September 11 attacks cost the insurance industry the equivalent of $45bn in 2017 terms, according to the Insurance Information Institute, and led to years of litigation over who should bear the cost.
Both Hiscox and Lloyd’s have expanded heavily into cyber insurance in recent years, selling protection against the costs of dealing with cyber attacks.
Husch Blackwell said it had not been hacked: “Several documents bearing the letterhead of a predecessor law firm to Husch Blackwell were made public earlier this week by a cyber terrorist group,” the company said in a statement.
“After a thorough review Husch Blackwell can confirm that no documents were obtained from Husch Blackwell and that there was no unauthorised access to Husch Blackwell systems, client files, documents or data.” -FT
A
spokesperson for Lloyd's said it had no evidence of a breach of their
systems, and said in a statement "Lloyd’s will continue to
monitor the situation closely, including working with managing agents
targeted by the hacker group."
Silverstein
Properties says that the company is investigating the claims, and
that "e are aware of claims of alleged security breaches at
firms involved in the five-year insurance litigation following the
attacks of 9/11," adding "To date, we have found no
evidence to support a security breach at our company. We
have spent the last 17 years fulfilling our obligation to deliver a
magnificent and fully rebuilt World Trade Center. We will not be
distracted by 9/11 conspiracy theories."
There is is a much (much!) bigger issue going on here behind the scenes.
ReplyDeleteThe following may be very difficult for some people to comprehend, that is why very few people have worked out the link (although some can 'sense' there is more to this). Sadly most people are still clueless and wont 'get it' unless a government official explains it to them on TV.
Basicaly this 9/11 documents hack, and the Kerch Strait incident of November 2018, are linked to full 9/11 disclosure.
To be more specific, it is all to do with forcing full-disclosure that the 9/11 twin-towers demolition was the result of non-conventional explosives (for those who are still clueless, the twin towers were demolished using compact neutron type demolition devices).
This was to be exposed in mid 2019 by the Russians, during the trial and prosecution of the British Agents captured during the Kerch Straight / Crimea bridge incident of November 2018.
The public were to be presented with many 'parellel revalations' during the Kerch Strait incident trials, including confirmation of the existance of small size, low-yeild nuclear devices (they burn very very hot - ideal for melting steel - but provide little in the way of blast and radiation making them ideal for use in populated areas, or where collateral damage is not an option).
Footage of NATO and Soviet era nuclear demolition charges being detonated was to to be shown next to the twin towers falling and the various sizes/shapes/patterns of the explosion and clouds of dust.
The evidence to be presented, even without the actual recovered NATO SADM type device being presented (which was to be the icing on the evidential cake), was to be so compelling (and obvious) that even the ignorant could not fail to compare the two incidents and draw logical conclusions regarding the actual existance and actual use of such nuclear demolition devices, and therefore the truth about 9/11 without it actually being 'officially' disclosed.
However!
Clearly some sort of deal/agreement/arrangement has been made between the US/UK and Russia not to pursue this matter as the Kerch Strait incident has been allowed to slide into oblivion.
Speculation suggests that the immediate pull out of US Spec Ops (to be followed by other deployed units afterwards) from both Ukraine and Syria, and potentially also Afghanistan, is linked to the agreement with Russia to let the nuclear demolition aspect of th Kerch Strait incident slide into the oblivion of the Orwellian memory hole.
It has also been sugested that the non-disclosure deal included the putting on a leash of extremist Ukrainian elements (regarding further provocations towards Russia and the calling off of any Donbass Christmas offensive / chemical false flag).
Fortunately, many people have already made the intellectual link between the Kerch Strait incident and 9/11 disclosure. The comparisions are actually quite obvious when considered by a working mind. Discussions have also apeared on Youtube, which means many more people will begin to get it. Two of the most interesting videos I have so far come accross are linked below:
https://youtu.be/qKiWFs7nleQ
https://youtu.be/mNfcHUP9spk
https://youtu.be/DZErUMhO434