Russia Confirms Toxic Cloud Of "Extremely High" Radiation; Source Remains A Mystery
21
November, 2017
One
month after
a mysterious radiation cloud was
observed over Europe, whose source remained unknown last
week speculation
emerged that
it may have been the result of a "nuclear accident" in
Russia or Kazakhstan, on Tuesday Russian authorities on Tuesday
confirmed the previous reports of a spike in radioactivity in the air
over the Ural Mountains. In a statement, the Russian Meteorological
Service said that it recorded the release of Ruthenium-106 in the
southern Urals in late September and classified it as "extremely
high contamination."
Earlier
this month, France's nuclear safety agency earlier this month said
that it recorded a spike in radioactivity, and said that "the
most plausible zone of release" of this radioactive material
"lies between the Volga and the Urals" from a suspected
accident involving nuclear fuel or the production of radioactive
material. The agency noted, however, that it is impossible to
determine the exact point of release given the available data.
Luckily, it said the release of the isotope Ruthenium-106 posed no
health or environmental risks to European countries.
France’s
Institute for Radioprotection and Nuclear Safety published this
graphic
to show radiation levels.
to show radiation levels.
At
the time, Russia's state-controlled Rosatom corporation - the
same company implicated in the Uranium One scandal -
said in a statement that there had been no radiation leak from its
facilities. That changed when the Russian meteorological service
(Rosgidromet) reported that it had detected record levels of
radiation in the villages located in Russia's Ural region adjacent to
Rosatom's Mayak plant for spent nuclear fuel. Some calculated that
the radiation exposure levels were up to 1,000x higher than the
normal rate.
Mayak,
located in the Chelyabinsk region, issued a statement on Tuesday
denying it was the source of contamination. The plant said it has not
conducted any work on extracting Ruthenium-106 from spent nuclear
fuel "for several years."
Full statement below:
“The contamination of the atmosphere with ruthenium-106 isotope registered by Rosgidromet is not linked to the activity of Mayak. The measurements which Rosgidromet has released suggest that the dose people might have received is 20,000 times less than the allowed annual dose and presents no threat at all to health.”
Quoted
by Sputnik,
the Rosatom represtative stated that there were "no incidents or
accidents at nuclear facilities in Russia".
The
Mayak nuclear processing plant, located in the Urals, has also come
out with a statement saying that "atmospheric pollution with
ruthenium-106 that was found by Rosgidromet is not connected to the
work of Mayak," since the work on the separation of
ruthenium-106 from spent nuclear fuel (and the production of ionizing
radiation sources on its basis) has not been carried out for many
years at the facility.
Earlier,
Rosgidromet confirmed that the the monitoring systems have detected
an increase in the concentration of ruthenium over several parts of
Russia. However, according to the press release, the concetration
does not exceed the maximum permissible concetrations. The head of
Rosgidromet, however, said that the automatic monitoring system
detected an increase in the concentration of Ru-106 not only in
Russia, but also in neighboring countries such as Poland, Romania,
Bulgaria and Ukraine. According to him, the concentration in Romania
was 1.5-2 times higher than the concentration in Russia.
The
exact source of the spike, however, remains a mystery, though IRSN
suggested that the cause might be an accident.
Mayak
has been responsible for at least two of Russia's biggest radioactive
accidents. In 2004 it was confirmed that waste was being dumped in
the local river. Nuclear regulators say that no longer happens, but
anti-nuclear activists say it's impossible to tell given the level of
state secrecy. Also on Tuesday, Greenpeace said that it would
petition the Russian Prosecutor General's office to investigate "a
possible concealment of a radiation accident" and check whether
public health was sufficiently protected.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.