Trump is nothing but a symbol of an America in terminal decline.
"The final stages of capitalism, Karl Marx predicted, would be marked by global capital being unable to expand and generate profits at former levels. Capitalists would begin to consume the government along with the physical and social structures that sustained them. Democracy, social welfare, electoral participation, the common good and investment in public transportation, roads, bridges, utilities, industry, education, ecosystem protection and health care would be sacrificed to feed the mania for short-term profit. These assaults would destroy the host. This is the stage of late capitalism that Donald Trump represents."
Defying
Donald Trump’s Kleptocracy
By
Chris Hedges
2 January, 2016
The
final stages of capitalism, Karl Marx predicted, would be marked
by global capital being unable to expand and generate profits at
former levels. Capitalists would begin to consume the government
along with the physical and social structures that sustained
them. Democracy, social welfare, electoral participation, the
common good and investment in public transportation, roads,
bridges, utilities, industry, education, ecosystem protection and
health care would be sacrificed to feed the mania for short-term
profit. These assaults would destroy the host. This is the stage
of late capitalism that Donald Trump represents.
Trump
plans to oversee the last great campaign of corporate pillaging
of America. It will be as crass and brazen as the fleecing of the
desperate people, hoping for a miracle in the face of dead-end
jobs and ruinous personal debt, who visited his casinos or
shelled out thousands of dollars for the sham of Trump
University. He will attempt to unleash a kleptocracy—the word
comes from the Greek klépto, meaning thieves,
and kratos, meaning rule, so it is literally “rule
by thieves”—one that will rival the kleptocracies carried out
by Suharto in Indonesia and Ferdinand Marcos in the Philippines.
It is not that Trump and his family will use the influence of
government to increase their wealth, although this will certainly
take place on a massive scale; it is that hundreds of billions of
federal dollars will be diverted into the hands of cronies,
sleazy bankers, unethical financial firms and scabrous hedge fund
managers. The pillars of the liberal state will be obliterated.
The
only possibility for halting the destruction being designed by
the Trump transition team is sustained resistance and civil
disobedience that will create popular pressure for impeachment.
This is why I will be at themarch
in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 21 and speak that evening
at a rally with Kshama
Sawant and Jill
Stein.
Trump
is impulsive, ignorant and inept. His corruption and greed are so
unfettered he may become a burden and embarrassment to his party
and the nation, as well as a danger to himself. The longer he
stumbles in the unfamiliar corridors of governmental power the
more vulnerable he becomes. But if we are not in the streets to
hold the system accountable he may be able to cling to power and
inflict significant damage.
Laurence
Tribe, a professor of constitutional law at Harvard Law School,
has argued that Trump could be impeached under the Constitution’s
emoluments clause. This clause prohibits a federal officeholder
from receiving from a foreign power anything of value that could
compromise the exclusive loyalty owed to the Constitution.
Trump’s global businesses make him vulnerable, Tribe argues, to
foreign pressure from countries where he has assets. “Trump’s
continued interest in the Trump Organization and his steady
stream of monetary and other benefits from foreign powers put him
on a collision course with the emoluments clause,” Tribe wrote
in The Guardian.
If,
however, we suffer another catastrophic domestic terrorist attack
or launch a new war, the political space to examine and prosecute
Trump and remove him from office will disappear. The rhetoric
from the Oval Office will become bloodcurdling. The security and
surveillance state will go into hyperdrive. Any dissent,
including mere criticism of the president, will be attacked as
helping our enemies. Trump and his kleptocrats, under the
familiar cover of national security and war, will transform huge
sums of government money into personal assets.
The
Trump transition team is busy anointing its coterie of
kleptocrats. The appointment of Betsy DeVos (from a family with a
net worth in excess of $5 billion) to become secretary of
education means she will oversee the more than $70 billion spent
annually on the Department of Education. DeVos—the sister of
Eric Prince, who founded the notorious private security
firm Blackwater
Worldwide—has no direct experience as an educator. She
promoted a series of for-profit charter schools in Michigan that
make money but have had dismal academic results. She sees
vouchers as an effective tool to funnel government money into
schools run by the Christian right. Her goal is to indoctrinate,
not educate. She calls education reform a
way to “advance God’s kingdom.”Trump has already
proposed using $20 billion of the department’s budget for
vouchers. The American system of public education, already
crippled by funding cuts, will be destroyed if Trump and DeVos
succeed.
The
Veterans Administration spends $152.7 billion a year on veterans’
benefits that include general health care and treatment in VA
hospitals. Last week Trump publicly weighed
allowing veterans to use the for-profit health care
system. Cleveland Clinic CEO Toby Cosgrove (annual salary $2.3
million) is one of the front-runners to head the VA.
“I’ve
been saying we have to take care of our vets,” Trump told
reporters Wednesday at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Fla.
“We are working on something to make it great for our veterans
because they are treated very, very unfairly.”
“We
think we have to have kind of a public-private option, because
some vets love the VA,” he added. “Definitely an option on
the table to have a system where potentially vets can choose
either/or or all private.”
Rep.
Tom Price, a Georgia Republican (net worth $13 million), has been
selected by Trump to be secretary of health and human services.
He plans to abolish Obamacare. He said he expects the House to
push for Medicare privatization “within the first six to eight
months” of the Trump administration.
Steve
Mnuchin (net worth $40 million), a former partner at Goldman
Sachs and the president-elect’s choice to lead the Department
of the Treasury, told Fox Business that “getting Fannie
and Freddie out of government ownership” is one of the
Trump administration’s top 10 priorities. This is also the
stated goal of Trump’s choice for budget director, Rep. Mick
Mulvaney (net worth $3 million), a Republican from South
Carolina.
The
privatization of the government-backed mortgages would see
financial institutions authorized to issue mortgage-backed
securities that carry a government guarantee. If the mortgages
failed under the privatization scheme, the taxpayer would foot
the bill. If the mortgages succeeded, the banks would get the
profit. The privatization plan amounts to the
institutionalization of the 2008 government bailout for big
banks. It could cost the taxpayer billions.
The
biggest pot of gold is the $2.79 trillion contained in or owed to
the Social Security fund. The kleptocrats will work hard under
Trump to divert this money into the hands of hucksters and crooks
on Wall Street. Tom Leppert (net worth $12 million), the former
mayor of Dallas, whom Trump is expected to name to head the
Social Security Administration, not surprisingly advocates the
privatization of Social Security and Medicare. The infusion of
this kind of liquidity into an overheated stock market would
probably bring on a crash that would evaporate perhaps as much as
40 percent of the Social Security fund, rendering it insolvent.
“I
will never shy away from any issue, even the so-called ‘third
rail’ of entitlement reform,” Leppert wrote about privatizing
Social Security as he campaigned for the Texas Senate in 2012.
“Talk to any young person today, and they will tell you Social
Security and Medicare won’t be there for their generation. To
preserve these vital programs, we first and foremost must not
change anything for those ages 55 and older. These folks rely on
their benefits and we’ve made a promise to them. But for
younger workers, we need to provide Medicare subsidies for the
purchase of certified private plans, raise the retirement age,
encourage greater retirement savings, and launch an initiative of
Personal Retirement Accounts to allow every American, not just
the wealthy, to save and invest toward their retirement. Make no
mistake—if we don’t act now, these programs will go bankrupt.
The simple fact in this debate is that people who oppose reform
are the ones who want to destroy our entitlement system.”
He
went on to call for abolishing Medicare. “This would be
gradually phased-in over time and would not affect anyone
currently over the age of 55,” he wrote. “For younger
individuals, when they reach retirement, they will receive a
subsidy from the federal government that will allow them to
purchase certified coverage plans. Those with the lowest incomes
would receive more funds from vouchers and would be eligible for
additional Medicaid coverage.”
Social
services and government programs under Trump will be continually
degraded. Profits for those who oversee privatized educational,
health and Social Security funds will skyrocket. This orgy of
predation—the dream of the 1 percent—will be accompanied by
further austerity among the citizenry, along with soaring
personal costs for health care, utilities and basic services and
a crippling debt peonage.
We
will not have a champion in the Democratic Party’s Senate
minority leadership, headed by the party’s slicked-up version
of Trump, Sen. Chuck Schumer (net worth $700,000). Schumer sits
on the Senate Finance Committee, whose members are loyal and
well-compensated allies of the 1 percent, and he is a member of
the Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee. His chief role
in the party has been to raise millions of dollars from Wall
Street for the party, himself and party candidates including his
friend and protégé, the now
disgraced Anthony Weiner, a former member of the House.
Schumer’s
donors and allies include hedge fund moguls Steven Cohen (net
worth $13 billion), John Paulson (net worth $8.6 billion),
Stanley Druckenmiller (net worth $4.4 billion), Paul Tudor Jones
(net worth $4.3 billion), Paul Singer (net worth $2.2 billion)
and James Chanos (net worth $1.5 billion) and Donald Trump (net
worth $3.7 billion).
Schumer
is the senator-of-choice for Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and
Citigroup. Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns, before they
collapsed in 2008, lavishly funded his campaigns. Schumer joined
with Republicans in 1999 to repeal the Glass-Steagall Act, which
had created walls between investment and commercial banks. This
repeal set the stage for the 2008 global financial crisis.
Schumer voted to bail out Wall Street in 2008. He sponsored an
amendment that barred the Securities and Exchange Commission from
overseeing credit rating agencies, such as Standard & Poor’s
and Moody’s Investors Service.
Schumer,
like Trump, is addicted to his own celebrity. He, like Trump,
believes that politics is fundamentally about public relations.
This is why he trots out Bernie Sanders, his new “chair of
outreach” for Senate Democrats, to stand behind him like a
store mannequin at press conferences.
America
has only one genuine political party. It is the corporate party.
Schumer and Trump are charter members. They will work together—as
Trump has predicted—as a well-oiled wrecking crew.
Trump’s
illiteracy, lack of self-discipline and insatiable greed are
profound faults. He does not listen to others. He is cursed with
a self-destructive ego and unbridled narcissism. He cares nothing
for the law. And he usually acts on impulse. But Trump will not
be toppled unless we rise up in sustained protests to defy his
racism, misogyny, religious bigotry and wanton plunder. If he is
impeached and convicted, it will slow, although not halt, the
corporate state’s disemboweling of America. And that, for now,
is probably our best hope for the new year.
Chris
Hedges, spent nearly two decades as a foreign correspondent in
Central America, the Middle East, Africa and the Balkans. He has
reported from more than 50 countries and has worked for The
Christian Science Monitor, National Public Radio, The Dallas
Morning News and The New York Times, for which he was a foreign
correspondent for 15 years.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.