It wasn't one of my best mornings, that's for sure but I decided to keep an appointment with Guy McPherson who is very busy these days, trying to keep up with emails and invitations etc.
The following is a good part of our conversation.
The article Guy refers to is this.
I strongly recommend it, despite the length
Among
many climate scientists, gloom has set in. Things are worse than we
think, but they can't really talk about it
(Jason)
Box has been outspoken for years. He's done science projects with
Greenpeace, and he participated in the 2011 mass protest at the White
House organized by 350.org. In 2013, he made headlines when a
magazine reported his conclusion that a seventy-foot rise in sea
levels over the next few centuries was probably already "baked
into the system." Now, with one word, Box had ventured into two
particularly dangerous areas. First, the dirty secret of climate
science and government climate policies is that they're all based on
probabilities, which means that the effects of standard CO2 targets
like an 80 percent reduction by 2050 are based on the middle of the
probability curve. Box had ventured to the darker possibilities on
the curve's tail, where few scientists and zero politicians are
willing to go.
Worse,
he showed emotion, a subject ringed with taboos in all science but
especially in climate science. As a recent study from the University
of Bristol documented, climate scientists have been so distracted and
intimidated by the relentless campaign against them that they tend to
avoid any statements that might get them labeled "alarmists,"
retreating into a world of charts and data. But Box had been able to
resist all that. He even chased the media splash in interviews with
the Danish press, where they translated "we're fucked" into
its more decorous Danish equivalent, "on our ass,"
plastering those dispiriting words in large-type headlines all across
the country......
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.