One account of what happened at the US Supreme Court

I am posting this as a kind-of "for what it is worth" basis. One objection that has been stated is that if the room is sealed  how could anyone have heard the conversation.

However, the whole thing is so preposterous that this version of events does make some sense to me.

Loud Arguments in US 

Supreme Court Chambers 

over Texas Lawsuit - COURT 

INTIMIDATED

Hal Turner,

12 December, 2020

THIS ARTICLE WAS PREVIOUSLY LOCKED AND FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY.  IT HAS BEEN UNLOCKED AT THE PERSONAL REQUEST OF STEVE QUAYLE -- From a source deep inside the US Supreme Court as they discussed the pending Texas lawsuit against Pennsylvania et. al. . . .

"Hal, as you know I am a clerk for one of the Justices on SCOTUS. Today was like nothing we have ever seen. The justices are arguing loudly behind closed doors.

The Justices met in a closed and sealed room, as is standard.

Usually it is very calm, however today we could hear screaming all the way down the hall.

They met in person, because they didn't trust telephonic meeting as secure.

Chief Justice Roberts was screaming

"Are you going to be responsible for the rioting if we hear this case?"

"Don't tell me about Bush v. Gore, we weren't dealing with riots then"

"You are forgetting what your role here is Neil, and I don't want to hear from the two junior justices anymore. I will tell you how you will vote."

Justice Clarence Thomas says "This is the end of Democracy, John."

When they left the room, Roberts, the Libs and Kavanugh had big smiles. Alito and Thomas were visibly upset. ACB and Gorsuch didn't seem fazed at all."

Clearly Chief Justice Roberts is intimidated by the ATNIFA/Left-wing rioting.   Well, one has to wonder if maybe he can intimidated more  by some actions of the right wing?

I'm not going to bother doing that or anything else, and neither should any of you, but I'm just wondering, is all.