The
Arctic Is Getting Crazy
Feedback
loops between record Arctic temperatures and the jet stream may be
altering our weather
5
January, 2017
In
the past year the climate in the Arctic has at times bordered on the
absurd. Temperatures were 30 to 50 degrees Fahrenheit above average
in some places during the recent Christmas week. Through November the
area of ice-covered ocean in the region reached a record low in seven
of 11 months—an unprecedented stretch. More important, perhaps, the
difference between Arctic temperatures and those across the
midlatitudes of North America, Europe and Asia during 2016 was the
smallest ever seen.
That
narrowing gap is important to note because it seems to be driving
extreme weather in the midlatitudes, from heat waves and droughts to
heavy snowfalls. Why is the Arctic so crazy lately, and how strong is
the connection to bad weather to its south, where so many people
live? Scientific American asked Jennifer Francis, who is a research
professor at the Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences at Rutgers
University and has investigated Arctic climate change and its links
to weather worldwide since 1994.
[An
edited transcript of the interview follows.]
How
unusual is the ongoing string of Arctic climate records?
The
records are astounding because there are so many of them. The extra
warming that is happening up in the Arctic—the “Arctic
amplification”—has been the greatest we’ve ever seen. We’ve
also seen the lowest sea-ice thickness, and we’ve seen the greatest
amount of water vapor in the atmosphere. That one doesn’t usually
make headlines but it should; that water vapor comes from more
evaporation because there is more exposed, open ocean. Also, a lot
more water vapor is being transported northward by big swings in the
jet steam. That’s important because water vapor is a greenhouse gas
just like carbon dioxide and methane. It traps heat in the
atmosphere. That vapor also condenses as droplets we know as clouds,
which themselves trap more heat. The vapor is a big part of the
amplification story—a big reason the Arctic is warming faster than
anywhere else.
Does
the extra vapor contribute to any sort of feedback loop—conditions
that tend to feed upon themselves?
We’re
starting to think so. It is directly part of a feedback, in that more
loss of sea ice causes more evaporation, which traps more heat, which
melts more ice—one of the vicious cycles. But another vicious cycle
that may be emerging is that when the Arctic is very warm, we think
that is leading to the jet stream taking wavier paths—big northward
swings and southward dips. When the jet stream does that, it
transports more heat and moisture up into the Arctic, which heats the
Arctic more, which make the jet stream even wavier—another vicious
cycle related to disappearance of sea ice. During Christmas the North
Pole was above freezing—which is crazy for that time of year—and
it was related to one of the big swings in the jet stream.
Very
recently scientists have begun to more directly link climate change
patterns to extreme weather events, which they have typically been
reluctant to do. Are the links becoming clearer?
Well,
first, warmer temperatures worldwide are adding to heat waves. And
more water vapor worldwide is related to the atmosphere being
warmer—we have about 7 percent more water vapor in the atmosphere
now than we did in the 1950s, which is directly linked to the
increase in heavy precipitation events. Drought is also pretty
directly related to a warmer atmosphere.
Arctic
amplification—[the faster rise of Arctic temperatures than
midlatitude temperatures]—may be the most controversial factor.
What we think is happening is that amplification is favoring these
very wavy patterns in the jet stream. When those waves get large, we
tend to see very persistent weather patterns across midlatitudes. The
waves tend to move very slowly, and the waves are what create weather
we experience. Different parts of those waves tend to favor very
stormy patterns, very dry patterns or warm versus cold. So in your
neck of the woods, weather conditions are going to hang around
longer.
It’s
still difficult to unravel the persistent drought in California—what
fraction of that is due to general global warming versus more
persistent jet stream patterns because the Arctic is warming fast.
But that’s where the research is happening right now.
So
can we link the California drought to Arctic conditions or the jet
stream?
This
plays into how natural fluctuations in the climate system in the
midlatitudes and the tropics are perhaps being intensified by Arctic
warming. A good example—and some studies make this pretty clear—is
when sea-surface temperature patterns in the Pacific Ocean tend to
put one of these northward swings, or ridges, in the jet stream in
particular locations. In the last few years the patterns have tended
to put a ridge near the west coast of North America. That’s a
natural thing. Along with that, though, we’ve had very little sea
ice on the Pacific side of the Arctic. There’s been a lot of warm
air over that region—Alaska has had a lot of record temperatures
and a lot of rain. What we think happens is that when there is a
ridge forming in a location where Arctic warming can intensify it,
that makes the ridge strong and builds it even farther northward. It
creates an even bigger wave in the jet stream. You get a stronger
ridge over western North America and a stronger southward dip that is
farther toward eastern North America.
How
would that contribute to the California drought? Does it move the
rain northward?
Ridges
are dry, clear weather. This has been the so-called ridiculously
resilient ridge—it has been in just the right place to make
California really dry. It’s sent the storms up into Seattle, the
Pacific Northwest and Alaska.
Can
we attribute other extreme weather to the Arctic, for example the
excessive snowfall and cold in Siberia?
The
20- to 30-degree warmer anomalies in the Arctic have been matched by
20- to 30-degree colder anomalies in Siberia. This mechanism has been
very well documented. The warm Arctic, particularly the region north
of Scandinavia—the Barents and Kara seas—is one of the places
where sea ice has been lost the most. It has been persistently low
this year. That tends to bulge the jet stream northward, which
creates a dip to the east that has helped usher more Arctic air down
into Siberia, and also caused earlier snowfall there. Once you get
snow on the land, it insulates the land and makes the weather even
colder. Having snow earlier, and more of it, is one of these vicious
cycles that makes it even colder—and the cold helps to induce the
jet stream’s southward dip there.
What
about the polar vortex, which is said to be “meandering” more
lately?
This
gets weedier. Several trends in the last year and half suggest that
when the jet stream gets wavy in the wintertime and the Arctic is
really warm, we tend to see the stratospheric [or polar] vortex
became less circular—more meandering, even split into two. This has
happened a lot in the last few years. When the polar vortex gets
disrupted, it tends to affect the jet stream late in the winter.
There seems to be a long-term memory in the system, starting with low
sea ice and warm temperatures in the fall in the Arctic, then this
vortex behavior into February and even March.
Was
there any connection to the heavy 2016 floods in Louisiana?
The
flooding storm system was very slow-moving, but we’ve seen that
before. Whether this is connected to the Arctic is tenuous.
Scientists
have been reluctant to attribute specific weather events to climate
change. Is that changing?
I
think the reluctance initially was that this was a new hypothesis.
And I think some of the people who have studied the tropics have
pretty much maintained that the tropics controls weather patterns all
over the world. So then comes a new kid on the block saying, “Oh,
it’s not just the tropics, it’s the Arctic, too!” There was
some reluctance to accept that this region on the top of the world
could impact something as huge as the jet stream. But there have been
many dozens of studies since 2012 that have supported the general
idea. They’re also finding that it is complicated—different
mechanisms happen during different seasons in different places—but
it’s all starting to become clearer. There has been enough research
now that the hypothesis is transitioning to a theory.
Is
it fair to say the changing Arctic behaviors line up with what
scientists expected?
Some
events do not fit what was expected 10 years ago or even five years
ago, but they do fit this newer hypothesis that links the Arctic with
the jet stream. There is a clear indication that ENSO [the El
Niño–Southern Oscillation, or El Niño/La Niña cycle] is not the
only game in town anymore.
And
are the Arctic records happening sooner than expected?
It
does seem as though things are unfolding faster than most people
expected. The ice is certainty disappearing faster than we expected.
Even five years ago most models were projecting that we’d see a
summer without sea ice probably by end of the century. Now the
estimates or more like 2030 or 2040, and even that might be too far
into the future. The whole ream of records that has been broken in
the Arctic in the past year seems to indicate that we’re seeing
things unfold faster. And that's happening all across the Earth’s
climate system
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.