A
mean temperature of 20.3C?
How
do they work this out.
Apart
from a few days around New Year when a cyclone came through the
temperatures where I live in Wellington NEVER WENT BELOW 21C. The
average, I would say was about 25C.How do you get a mean temperature
that IS LESS THAN THE MINIMUM TEMPERATURE?
Lies,
lies and damned statistics!
Since
buying a max-min thermometer I have been measuring the temperature
inside the house that gets warm but is not in direct sun. Over the 10
days from 20 Jan to 30 Jan I got the following indicative figures
Mean
maximum - 28.9
Mean
minimum - 22.5
Mean
evening temperature when resetting the thermometer - 25.7
January
2018 NZ's hottest month on record
January
was officially the hottest month since records began in 1909.
4
February, 2018
NIWA
figures show average temperatures for the month of January across the
country was 20.3°C.
[All I can say is there must have been some cold parts of the country - SMR]
The
temperature for January normally averages 17.1°.
NIWA
climate scientist Gregor Macara said the month's temperatures were
unprecedented.
"It
was unusual that the entire country seemed to observe temperatures
that weren't only above average, but really considerably above
average."
"The
majority of observation stations we had observed temperatures more
than 3° above normal and in fact there are quite a few sites that
were 4° above normal which were essentially unprecedented -
particularly for this time of year," he said.
New
Zealand experienced intense heat over the 31 days with the highest
temperature recorded as 37.6° in the Central Otago town, Clyde.
Other
hot spots included Otago, the West Coast, Kāpiti Coast, and
Taranaki, which all observed temperatures four degrees higher than
normal.
The
extreme temperatures were caused by higher sea temperatures and
northerly winds, Mr Macara said.
He
said that as an island nation, New Zealand was heavily influenced by
the sea's temperature.
The
previous hottest recorded month was February 1998, when temperatures
hit 19.6°.
The following goes, first-and- foremost for Radio New Zealand!
Everyone’s
talking about the heatwave. Just don’t mention the elephant in the
sauna
From fan shortages to sweaty insomnia, New Zealand can’t get enough of heatwave talk. But there’s one subject that few media stories about high summer temperatures seem eager to discuss.
30
January, 2018
Over
the past two weeks, virtual gallons of digital ink have been spilled
over the current record-breaking temperatures Kiwis are enduring all
over the country. Every new high has been documented with the
fastidiousness of a cricket scorer, and the media has covered
everything from consequent fan shortages and exploding ice cream
demand to methods for staying safe and protecting one’s pets in the
sweltering heat. No heatwave-related topic was left undiscussed.
None, that is, but climate change.
While
most Aucklanders enjoyed a day off or attended Laneway on Monday, I,
clearly hating myself, elected to use the public holiday to trawl
through news archives. I wanted to analyse just how much media
coverage climate change received over the past couple of weeks in
daily news outlets that covered the heatwave. I examined pieces put
up by the Herald,
stuff.co.nz, Newshub, One
News,
and even The Spinoff between January 13 and 29,
coincidentally totalling a nice, even 100.
The
results were, well, not great.
In
that period, only 11% – in other words, 11 reports total – so
much as mentioned climate change or global warming while talking
about the current heatwave (The
Spinoff was
not one of them). The results get more interesting the further you
drill down.
Of
these 11, all but two only mention climate change in passing, noting
it as part of the cause of the heatwave. One of the exceptions
is this Nelson
Mail piece which
delves at length into how and to what extent the warming planet has
contributed to this unusually hot summer. The other is this Sunday
Star-Times op-ed by
Oscar Kightley, which not only mentions climate change in the
headline, but ends with the sentiment that “we really need to get
busy” on climate change.
In
fact, two more of the 11 reports that do mention climate change were
op-eds: this
one by
comedian James Nokise and this
one by
Alison Mau. I’ve also been pointed to this Waikato
Timespiece by
Tom O’Connor, but because it was written back in December last
year, it fell outside the sample period I looked at. And as
the Listener’s Rebecca
Macfie pointed
out to me,
she’s been writing
consistently about
these issues for a long time, though since my informal survey only
covered daily news outlets, I didn’t count her most recent column
here.
The
other 89 reports often did go into the causes for the heatwave, even
if briefly – but they neglected to list climate change, even when
reports mentioned that temperature records that had stood for more
than a century had been smashed.
Often,
reports chalked up the cause of the heatwave to hot
air moving
from Australia, added
moisture in
the air from a warmer ocean, and a variety
of other atmospheric effects.
Yet reports consistently failed to go further than this and connect
these conditions to the warming of the planet more generally.
This Newshub piece is
emblematic, pointing to “higher-than-usual sea temperatures” as
the cause of the heatwave, and even quoting a meteorologist calling
them “something I’ve never seen before”. But he linked them
purely to “the anti-cyclone we had in November,” stopping short
of mentioning climate change, the effects of which include higher
ocean temperatures.
Massey
University’s Dr. Jan Sinclair, a former science journalist
whose doctoral
thesis focused
on media treatment of the environmental risk of climate change, says
that for many years climate scientists were hesitant to connect such
specific events to climate change, partly because the atmosphere is
so complex, and partly because scientists deal in uncertainty.
And
indeed, some climate scientists continue to warn against ascribing
specific events to climate change.
“They
said for a number of years before 2000 that these extreme events are
part of the pattern of what they would expect to see,” says
Sinclair. “It’s only in the last seven years they’ve started
saying this is evidence of climate change.”
This
is partly borne out by some of the coverage of the heatwave.
The Nelson
Mail piece,
for instance, featured climate scientist James Renwick explaining
that “what we’ve seen this summer is very consistent with climate
change.”
Why
is any of this a big deal? After all, many of the reports discuss
records being broken and insane-by-our-standards heat, so why the
need to explicitly mention climate change?
One
reason is that some form of climate denial – whether outright
disbelief that it’s happening or a reluctance to do too much about
it – remains surprisingly resilient in Aotearoa.
A 2015
Motu study found
that less than half of New Zealanders were certain climate change was
really happening – most were either undecided or disagreed. A
majority also either disagreed with (27%) or were undecided on (31%)
the idea that climate change would negatively affect New Zealand.
Even
more optimistic studies show disquieting results. A Pure
Advantage survey from
last year that showed widespread Kiwi support for the Paris climate
agreement nonetheless found that a third of those aged 55 or over
thought our targets are “too ambitious,” and only 19% of all New
Zealanders surveyed thought we should be aiming for higher.
So, as
far as we’ve come,
an information gap – not to mention a gap in enthusiasm for policy
change – on climate change persists in New Zealand. Perhaps
consistently linking the current heatwave to it as a matter of course
could have gone some way to fixing this.
Says
Sinclair, “If a lot of different media stories take the same
approach and belief system in their stories, people will take that on
board.”
Journalists
have often talked about the challenge of making climate chaJnge seem
like a relevant concern to the ordinary person.
“Any
story that is based on numbers, statistics and graphs is going to be
difficult to get your head around and challenging to hook people
into,” broadcast journalist Samantha Hayes told
The Spinofflast
year.
“I
think one of the major issues journalists have with covering climate
change is that it’s so abstract,” said Charlie Mitchell, an
environmental journalist for The
Press and
stuff.co.nz. “You can write about how New Brighton [in
Christchurch] will be underwater a century from now and it won’t
resonate, I guess because it doesn’t feel real.”
The
current heatwave therefore seems to afford a perfect opportunity to
rectify this: it’s tangible, it’s happening right now, and it
touches on the lived experience of just about everyone in the
country. Not only that, but judging from the number of reports on
frustrated Kiwis unable to buy fans – as well as this
tragic story of
a Christchurch woman who died of hyperthermia – the heat is clearly
a concern for many, even as some enjoy basking in the warmer weather.
Putting
climate change at the forefront of reporting on the heatwave wouldn’t
have just meant mentioning climate change as a cause, though of
course that would have been important. It also would have meant using
the heatwave as an opportunity to put the spotlight on climate
change-related topics.
“To
improve on their environmental reporting, the media can clearly
report the facts,” says Sinclair. “But they can also look more at
alternative technologies and protection options, encourage people to
be actively aware of risks, and advise them on how to reduce
emissions.”
Just
as events like earthquake destruction or economic crashes are used to
take a magnifying glass to their wider underlying causes and what we
could do better to prevent them, there’s no shortage of questions
the heatwave could make newsrooms ask. How prepared are we to face
the effects of climate change? Is the current government’s policy
of continuing to allow some mining and oil drilling consistent with
its climate goals? How can the private sector change its business
practices to reduce emissions? How can we reduce our reliance on
plastic and other single-use materials, particularly now that
China won’t serve as our dumping ground?
How can we deal with skyrocketing temperatures without contributing
to the problem? And so on.
Best
of all, the record-breaking heat provides an easy news-hook for any
of these stories, helping solidify the reality and impact of climate
change for sceptical readers while also potentially putting eyeballs
on the topic climate policy, something that might normally seem dull,
but may got more attention amidst the frenzy over our current hellish
(read: Australia-esque) summer.
Many
of the reports I looked at already do this, offering readers
everything from health
tips for older people in
the heat and advice for how
to keep pets safe,
to strategies for keeping cool in general and getting
a decent night’s sleep.
The coverage – including right here in The Spinoff, where that
last article was published – seems weighted toward the reactive,
instead of focusing on what we can do, not just as individuals but as
a society, to prevent these problems from getting worse.
Fortunately
(or, more accurately, unfortunately), the current heatwave won’t be
the last time record-breaking temperatures and extreme weather events
afford an opportunity to talk about climate change. Hopefully next
time we’ll be ready.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.