Putin behind Brexit? Russiagate hysteria spreads to Britain
Anti-Brexit campaigners turn to ‘Russian meddling’ meme in last ditch effort to reverse Brexit
Alexander
Mercouris
4
November, 2017
Over
the course of the last few weeks a campaign has been launched in
Britain spearheaded by the Guardian newspaper to ‘delegitimise’
the Brexit referendum result by alleging that it was Russian
‘meddling’ which caused it.
Thus
we have seen a series of sensationalist reports insinuating that
Arron Banks – the British millionaire who partly funded the Leave
campaign – is being funded by Russia, and claims that Professor
Mifsud – the London based academic referred to in the Papadopoulos
indictment – may have met British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson
at a fundraising dinner arranged by another MP (Johnson denies it)
and that Papadopoulos himself whilst a member of the Trump campaign
met a British minister on the fringe of the UN General Assembly
session in New York in September 2016.
There
have also been insinuations that Russia launched a social media
campaign to support Brexit, and even that Russian intelligence is
behind the ‘black book’ setting out various sex allegations
against Conservatives ministers and MPs which is currently
circulating and which has led to the forced resignation of Britain’s
Defence Secretary Michael Fallon.
The
motive for this campaign was set out two day ago in an article by
Mark Galeotti in the Guardian: to ‘delegitimise’ the Brexit
referendum result
……. this may come at exactly the right time to let a British political elite increasingly alarmed about Brexit off the hook. There is public dismay at the slow progress of talks, but no clear mandate to reverse policy. Hard evidence of active, covert Russian interference would delegitimise the original vote, given the narrow margin of victory. Hardcore Brexiteers will risk looking like Putin’s “useful idiots”.
This would allow the government to re-run or even disregard the referendum without looking as if it is admitting a mistake or challenging the popular will. It would also smooth the way to allowing article 50 to be revoked or ignored with no penalty. (While the EU is formally committed to allowing the UK to change its mind, there are those in Brussels with more punitive intent.)
In
reality the problem with all these allegations is that there is
absolutely no evidence to support them. That is not
however preventing the militantly anti-Brexit Guardian from taking
them seriously, or from certain militantly anti-Brexit and
anti-Corbyn Labour MPs such as Ben Bradshaw and Labour’s Deputy
Leader Tom Watson from doing the same.
The
pattern of making wild and unsubstantiated allegations of a sinister
conspiracy involving Russia without producing any evidence to support
them in order to reverse an electoral outcome the establishment
doesn’t like is one with which close followers of the US Russiagate
conspiracy theory will be very familiar.
In
the British case these claims are however far less likely to gain
traction than they have done in the US.
Whilst
in the US the entire political establishment and almost the entire
news media were hostile during the Presidential election to Donald
Trump and continue to be so to this day, in Britain there are enough
members of the political establishment and enough support for Brexit
in the media to ensure that claims of this sort will face far more
intense scrutiny and meet with far greater skepticism than the
analogous claims have done in the US.
Besides
whilst Donald Trump opened himself up to suspicion of being a Kremlin
tool by announcing during the election his wish for better relations
with Russia, many of the leaders of the Leave campaign such as the
Conservative cabinet minister Michael Gove are fierce critics of
Russia, making any attempt to link the Leave campaign to Russia
extremely difficult.
The
Remain supporters who back this campaign anyway make a fundamental
error in appearing to take it for granted that if the British change
their minds on Brexit the EU will take them back. In reality
many EU governments – long exasperated by British hostility to the
EU – would be very loathe to have the British back, all the more so
because they could not in that case be sure that the British would
not at some future time vote to leave the EU again.
However
what makes these allegations ultimately so astonishing is the way
that they appear to assume that a covert Russian campaign to get
Britain out of the EU – of which no evidence exists – was
successful, whilst a very public, very overt US campaign to keep
Britain in the EU – of which evidence exists in abundance – was
unsuccessful.
Of
the existence of the US campaign there can be no doubt since US
President Barack Obama publicly
called on the British to reject Brexit,
travelling to Britain in order to do so. Other leaders of other
Western countries including Chancellor Merkel of Germany called on
the British to reject Brexit as well. Prime Minister Renzi of
Italy did so in my presence (at the 2016 SPIEF conference in St.
Petersburg). By contrast throughout the Brexit referendum
campaign President Putin and the Russian government were careful to
take no side at all, keeping their public comments to a minimum.
For the record Putin has not said he supports Brexit to this day.
To
suppose that a covert Russian campaign in support of Brexit could
succeed in the teeth of the public opposition to Brexit of every
single important Western government – including the US and German
governments – credits the Russians with a degree of influence over
the British public that is truly remarkable.
To
suppose such a thing would incidentally also be an admission that the
Russians have a better understanding of British public opinion than
all of Britain’s major political parties (all of whom campaigned
against Brexit) and all of the West’s most important governments
do.
I
do not credit the Russians with that degree of influence or with that
level of understanding. I cannot that anyone in their senses
would do so either.
Ultimately
it reflects the crisis of confidence on the part of Britain’s elite
that some of them now say they do.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.