Dilma out: Brazilian plutocracy sets 54mn votes on fire
Never in modern political history has it been so easy to “abolish the people” and simply erase 54 million votes cast in a free and fair presidential election.
Pepe
Escobar
Brazil's
President Dilma Rousseff. © Ueslei Marcelino / Reuters
RT,
13
May, 2016
Forget
about hanging chads, as in Florida 2000. This is a day that will live
in infamy all across the Global South – when what was one of its
most dynamic democracies veered into a plutocratic regime, under a
flimsy parliamentary/judicial veneer, with legal and constitutional
guarantees now at the mercy of lowly comprador elites.
After
the proverbial marathon, the Brazilian Senate voted 55-22 to put
President Dilma Rousseff on trial for “crimes
of responsibility” –
related to alleged window dressing of the government’s budget.
This
is the culmination of a drawn-out process that started even before
Rousseff won re-election in late 2014 with over 54 million votes. I
have described the bunch of perpetrators of what Brazilian creativity
has termed ‘golpeachment’
(a mix of coup – “golpe” in
Portuguese – and impeachment) as Hybrid
War hyenas.
Sophisticated
golpeachment – supported by what amounts to an Electoral
Inquisition College – has propelled Hybrid War to whole new levels.
That
carried with it a fabulous cost-benefit ratio. Now the (immensely
corrupt) Brazilian political system and the currentexecutive/legislative/judiciary/mainstream media alignment can be
used by the usual suspects for their geopolitical agenda.
Welcome
to regime change light – politics, in a nutshell – as war by
other means on the BRICS. A new software, a new operating system.
Carrying a pathetic corollary; if the US is the Empire of Chaos,
Brazil has now gloriously reached the status of Sub-Empire of
Scoundrels.
Scoundrels galore
Rousseff
may be accused of serious economic mismanagement, and of being
incapable of political articulation among the shark pool that is
(immensely corrupt) Brazilian politics. But she is not corrupt. She
made a serious mistake in fighting inflation, allowing interest rates
to rise to an unsustainable level; so demand in Brazil dramatically
dropped, and recession became the norm. She is the (convenient)
scapegoat for Brazil’s recession.
She
certainly may be blamed for not having a Plan B to fight the global
recession. Brazil essentially works on two pillars; commodity exports
and local companies relying on the teats of the state. Infrastructure
in general is dismal – adding to what is described as
the “Brazilian cost” of doing business. With the commodity slump,
state funds dwindled and everything was paralyzed – credit,
investment, consumption.
The pretext for
Rousseff’s impeachment – allegedly transferring loans from public
banks to the Treasury in order to disguise the size of Brazil’s
fiscal deficit – is flimsy at best. Every administration in the
West does it – and that includes Clinton’s, Bush’s and Obama’s.
The
Operation Car Wash investigation,
dragging on for two years now, was supposed to uncover corruption in
the Brazilian political system – as in the collusion of oil giant
Petrobras executives, Brazilian construction companies, and political
campaign financing. Car Wash has nothing to do with the golpeachment
drive. Yet these have been two parallel highways converging to one
destination: the criminalization of the Workers’ Party, and the
definitive – if possible – political assassination of Rousseff
and her mentor, former President Lula.
When
golpeachment reached the lower house of Congress – an appalling
spectacle – Rousseff was eviscerated by Hybrid War hyenas of the
BBC variety; “BBC,” in
English, stands
for “bullet,”“bible” and “cattle,” where “bullet” refers
to the weapons and private security industry, “bible” to
pastors and evangelical fanatics, and “cattle” to
the powerful agribusiness lobby.
The “BBC” hyenas
are members of almost all Brazilian political parties, paperboys for
major corporations, and – last but not least – corruption
stalwarts. They all benefited from millionaire political campaigning.
The whole Car Wash investigation ultimately revolves around campaign
financing, which in Brazil, unlike the US with its legalized lobbies,
is a Tarantino-worthy Wild West.
The
Brazilian Senate is not exactly an “upper” –
as in more polished – house. Eighty percent of members are white
men – in a country where miscegenation rules. A staggering 58
percent is under criminal investigation – linked to Car Wash. Sixty
percent hail from political dynasties. And 13 percent – as
alternates – were not elected at all. Among those favoring
impeachment, 30 out of 49 are in trouble with the law. Charges
include mostly money laundering, financial crimes and outright
corruption. Renan Calheiros, the president of the Senate – who
oversaw today’s impeachment vote – is the target of no fewer
than nine separate
money laundering/corruption Car Wash lines of investigation, plus
another two criminal probes.
Meet the three Banana Republic amigos
Rousseff
is now suspended for a maximum 180 days while a Senate committee
decides whether to impeach her for good. Enter President-in-Waiting
Michel Temer – a dodgy, shady operator – who has been branded
a “usurper” by
Rousseff. And usurper this provincial Brutus certainly is –
according to his own words. On March 30 last year, he was tweeting
that,“Impeachment
is unthinkable, it would create an institutional crisis. There is no
judicial or political basis for it.”
His
administration is born with the original sin of being illegal and
massively unpopular; his approval rating floats between an epic 1
percent and 2 percent. He was already fined last week for violating
campaign finance limits. And, predictably, he’s drowning in a
corruption swamp – named in two Car Wash plea bargains and accused
of being part of an illegal scheme of ethanol buying; he may become
ineligible for the next eight years. Almost 60 percent of Brazilians
also want him impeached –
on the same charges leveled against Rousseff.
Members
of Brazil's Senate react after a vote to impeach President Dilma
Rousseff for breaking budget laws in Brasilia, Brazil, May 12, 2016.
© Ueslei Marcelino / Reuters
Brutus
1 (Temer) would not bask in the glow of his 15 minutes of fame
without the shenanigans of Brutus 2 (Brazil’s number one crook,
former speaker of the lower house Eduardo Cunha, facing charges of
bribery and perjury, holder of illegal Swiss accounts, and now
finally sidelined by the Supreme Court). It was Brutus 2 who
fast-tracked impeachment as pure vengeance; the Workers’ Party did
not cover his back as he was facing a tsunami of corruption charges.
Brutus 2 used all his vast powers – he runs a campaign financing
scam inside Congress – to obstruct the Car Wash investigation. His
replacement, the interim speaker, is also under investigation for
bribery.
So
meet Temer, Cunha, Calheiros; these three amigos are the true stars
of the Banana Republic of Scoundrels/Crooks.
As
if the Supreme Court would be rascal-free. Judge Gilmar Mendes, for
instance, is a lowly plutocrat vassal. When an attorney for the
government entered a motion to suspend impeachment, he quipped, “Ah,
they can go to heaven, to the Pope, or to hell.” Another
pompous judge received a request to sideline Cunha as early as
December 2015. He only examined the request over four months later,
when the whole golpeachment scam was in its decisive phase. And still
he argued, “there’s
no proof Cunha contaminated the impeachment process.”
Finally,
complementing the whole scam, we find Brazilian mainstream media,
with the toxic Globo media empire – which lavishly profited from
the 1964 military coup – at the forefront.
All hail the neoliberal restoration
Wall
Street – as well as the City of London – could not hide its
excitement with golpeachment, believing Brutus 1 Temer will be an
economic upgrade. Arguably, he might dare to tweak Brazil’s
Kafkaesque tax code and do something about the enormous hole in the
pension system. But what that mythical entity – the “markets” –
and myriad “investors” are
salivating about is the prospect of fabulous rates of return in a
reopened-for-speculation Brazil. The Brutus 1 game will be
a neoliberal feast,
actually a restoration, with no popular representation whatsoever.
The golpeachment gang gets really incensed when they are identified as coup plotters. Still, they could not give a damn about the OAS, Mercosur, Unasur – all of them condemned the coup – not to mention the Holy Grail: the BRICS. Under Brutus 1, the Foreign Ministry, to be led by a sore loser senator, is bound to sink Brazil’s key role in BRICS cooperation, to the benefit of Exceptionalistan.
All
one needs to know is that neither Nobel Peace Prize-winner
Barack “kill
list” Obama
nor Queen of Chaos Hillary “We
came, we saw, he died” Clinton
condemned the ongoing regime change light/golpeachment. That’s
predictable, considering Exceptionalistan’sNSA spied
on Petrobras and Dilma Rousseff personally – the genesis of what
would develop as the Car Wash investigation.
White
House spokesman Josh Earnest limited himself to the proverbial
platitudes: “challenging
moment”; “trust
in Brazilian democratic institutions”;
or even “mature
democracy.” Yet
he added, significantly, that Brazil is “under
scrutiny.”
Of
course, the current stage of a very sophisticated Hybrid War strategy
has been accomplished. But there are countless cliffhangers ahead.
The Car Wash investigation – currently in slow motion – will pick
up speed as a rash of dodgy plea bargains is already in store to
create the conditions to criminalize for good not only Dilma Rousseff
but the key piece in the chessboard: Lula.
Game
over? Not so
fast.
The anti-golpeachment front does have a strategy: to imprint
especially in “deep
Brazil,” the
vast masses of the working poor, the notion of illegality; to rebuild
Rousseff’s image as the victim of a profound injustice; to
re-energize the progressive political front; to make sure the Brutus
1 government will fail; and to create the conditions for the man who
will come in from the cold to win the 2018 presidential elections.
Brazilian
House of Cards? Bets could be made this may even end up as Anaconda,
with Lula immobilizing the Hybrid War hyenas in a cobra clutch.
Pepe Escobar is an independent geopolitical analyst. He writes for RT, Sputnik and TomDispatch, and is a frequent contributor to websites and radio and TV shows ranging from the US to East Asia. He is the former roving correspondent for Asia Times Online. Born in Brazil, he's been a foreign correspondent since 1985, and has lived in London, Paris, Milan, Los Angeles, Washington, Bangkok and Hong Kong. Even before 9/11 he specialized in covering the arc from the Middle East to Central and East Asia, with an emphasis on Big Power geopolitics and energy wars. He is the author of "Globalistan" (2007), "Red Zone Blues" (2007), "Obama does Globalistan" (2009) and "Empire of Chaos" (2014), all published by Nimble Books. His latest book is "2030", also by Nimble Books, out in December 2015.
Brazil: Back in the Clutches of Washington
Tel-SUR
The decision to oust Dilma Rousseff won't just rip the country apart politically, it will also threaten democracy and destabilize the region.
Meanwhile,
the U.S. stands to gain from the weakening of Dilma's leftist
government
Glenn Greenwald: What Is Happening in Brazil is Much Worse Than Donald Trump
I24 March, 2016
Brazil is facing its worst political crisis in over two decades as opponents of Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff attempt to impeach her on corruption charges. But Rousseff is refusing calls to resign, saying the impeachment proceedings against her amount to undemocratic attempts by the right-wing opposition to oust her from power. On Wednesday, former Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva called the impeachment proceedings against Rousseff an attempted "coup d’état."
We speak to Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Glenn Greenwald. His piece, "Brazil Is Engulfed by Ruling Class Corruption—and a Dangerous Subversion of Democracy," recently was published by The Intercept.
Brazil: An Honest Politician Will Be Removed By the Most Corrupt says Legal Scholar
Prof.
Boaventura de Sousa Santos says Brazil’s Supreme Court is able to
intervene on procedural grounds in Dilma Rousseff’s impeachment,
not on the merits of the case
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.