Great Barrier Reef bleaching is just one symptom of ecosystem collapse across Australia
the Conversation,
2 May, 2016
Media reports around the world have brought the mass coral bleaching of Australia’s Great Barrier Reef into people’s offices and homes.
With 93%
of individual reefs showing
bleaching, the devastation among researchers, celebrities and the
public is
palpable.
Unfortunately,
mass coral bleaching is just one example of a far broader problem.
Although it represents a rapid and extensive example of ecosystem
degradation, coral bleaching is not surprising: it is consistent with
many changes that are occurring now across Australia’s natural
environments.
Coral
bleaching has been seen on 93% of the reefs that make up the Great
Barrier Reef. (C)
XL Caitlin Seaview SurveyThe degradation and death of forests
Forest
dieback is increasingly common across Australia from the high
country and
the floodplains to
the savannahs.
Our
iconic trees – including the world’s tallest flowering plant,
the Mountain
Ash,
and the most widely distributed eucalypt, the River
Red Gum –
are among the hardest hit.
A
stark example is the floodplain forests of the Murray-Darling Basin.
Reduced rainfall and water extraction for human needs have deprived
River Red Gums of the flooding integral to their existence. The
consequence is that 79%
of forests on the Murray River have dieback.
Tree graveyards are a common sight.
Recent
extreme weather combined with recurring wildfire and intensified
logging has increased
mortality rates of large, old Mountain Ash trees by an order of
magnitude.
This has created a crisis for the animals that depend on them,
including the critically
endangered Leadbeater’s Possum.
The
collapse of Mountain Ash forests threatens Leadbeater’s Possum with
extinction. Greens
MPs/Flickr, CC
BY-NC-ND
The
plight of these forests foreshadows the fate of others (such as
Western Australia’s Jarrah
forests)
under a drying climate.
The decline of south-eastern Australia’s frogs
Australia’s
record-breaking Millennium
Drought hit
frog communities very
hard.
They have not recovered since.
It
was hoped that the heavy rainfalls from late 2010 to early 2012 (the
“Big
Wet”)
would help the frogs “bounce back”, given their capacity to lay
large numbers of eggs under suitable conditions.
Modest
improvements at the time of the Big Wet were undone with a return to
dry conditions. These pushed the frogs back to the dire levels seen
during the peak of the drought.
Species
whose calls will be familiar to many Australians — the
“crick-crick”
of the
common froglet,
the “plonk-bonk”
of the pobblebonk —
saw very little post-drought recovery.
Frogs
such as this ‘pobblebonk’ (or eastern banjo frog) haven’t
recovered after the drought. Doug
Beckers/Flickr, CC
BY-SA
Long
dry periods are expected in the region under climate-change models,
so the prospects for southeastern Australia’s amphibians seem
bleak.
The unravelling of Australia’s mammals
Australia
has a remarkably distinctive mammal
fauna. However, 30 mammal species have
become extinct in
the past 200 years. That’s an extinction rate worse than any other
country.
Particularly
disconcerting is that losses are
continuing at an unabated rate,
with two
Australian mammals lost
forever in
the past decade.
In
much of Australia, particularly in northern Australia, many native
mammals that were abundant 20 years ago have
become vanishingly rare.
The collapse of bird communities
The Millennium
Drought also
pushed bird communities of southern Australia over
the edge.
On
the back of historic declines (primarily due to land
clearing), two-thirds
of species declined
substantially as the drought took hold. The assumption, or perhaps
hope, was that these declines were part of a natural cycle, and that
the drought’s end would bring a return to normal. This
did not happen.
At
last count,
half of the species — including iconic species
like galahs, rosellas and fairy
wrens —
were still far less common than they were before the drought.
There
aren’t as many galahs as there were before the Millennium
Drought. Galah
image from www.shutterstock.com
The
result is that our bird communities have dramatically
changed in
as little as two decades. As we enter another period of drying, there
is grave concern about the future of southern Australia’s birds.
What do Australians value?
These
are just a few examples of massive ecosystem degradation. Sadly,
there are many more. The battle for Australia’s biodiversity can
still be won, but this requires decisive action on climate change and
serious investment over many election cycles.
In
2013, Australia ranked among the 40
most underfunded countries for biodiversity conservation,
a list otherwise dominated by developing countries.
The
budget allocation for the federal Department of the Environment is
shrinking and is now less than 0.5% of the government’s spending.
It is hard not to draw comparisons with the recent announcement that
Australia will spend A$50
billion on submarines.
By
contrast, avoiding extinctions of Australian birds would cost around
A$10 million per year —
a cost we are, at the moment, unwilling to meet.
US
Vice President Joe
Biden famously
said:
“Don’t tell me what you value; show me your budget, and I’ll tell you what you value.”
On
May 3, Australia’s government will present its 2016 budget and,
with an election looming, we will also soon learn about the
opposition’s spending commitments. The coming months will expose
how major parties value Australia’s environment, and the election
to follow will measure the degree to which Australians accept it.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.