The interview was one last year, but should be listened to be everyone.
ISIS: The Bombshell Interview to Impeach Obama
The
author found some difficulties in finding a proper title for this
post, which is based on a TV interview with the founder of Jihadist
movement in Egypt and a former top Al-Qaeda commander. Each line of
the interview is a title by itself, each piece of information is more
than enough to put tens of western officials and their regional
stooges behind bars for long times, those who are acting as the
Humanitarian Bastards crying for the suffering of the innocent they
only inflicted their suffering.
Finally,
I decided to post the text of the interview as it is without my usual
adding in, noting how the western citizens are played by their own
governments, so I’ll leave you with the interview conducted by pan
Arab Al-Maydeen TV with Sheikh Nabeel Naiem, who was introduced by
the TV presenter as: ‘the former founder of Jihad Organization &
expert in Islamist groups’, enjoy:
The
interview text:
– With
us here in the studio Sheikh Nabeel Naim former founder of Jihad
Organization & expert in Islamist groups, welcome..
Noting
that you were in Afghanistan with Osama Bin Laden & Dr. Ayman
Zawahri, in accommodation and also in prison with Dr. Ayman Zawahri,
can we say now you retired from Al-Qaeda?
Nabeel
Naiem:
Not really, they are the ones who deviated, we went there to fight
the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, and there was almost a unanimous
agreement among Islamic clerics that time on that (Jihad against
Soviets), and after that they deviated and turned their activities
against Islamic and Arabic countries, and they committed the
prohibited which is killing Muslims, and at the same time after the
death of Osama Bin Laden, Al-Qaeda turned into a mercenary (group)..
– You
are one of the founders of Jihad in Egypt, and you were at the
beginning times of Al-Qaeda so to speak, can a member of that rank
distance himself from Al-Qaeda, leave the organization? Will the
organization leave him? Some say it is not accepted in the ideology
of the organization..
Nabeel
Naiem: No,
the organization deviated, they became Takfiris, they are killing
Muslims.. Am I fighting Jihad (holy war) to go to hell or seeking
heaven?!
What
is the cause of Jihad? (whoever kills a believer intentionally –
his recompense is Hell, wherein he will abide eternally, and Allah
has become angry with him and has cursed him and has prepared for him
a great punishment) [Quran 4:93]
– Did
they call you a Kafir (non-believer) now?
Nabeel
Naiem:
The high ranks, like Ayman, no they did not, but the small lads
they’re the ones who consider me Kafir.
– The
natural question one would ask: Why wouldn’t some who consider you
Kafir try to assassinate you?
Nabeel
Naiem: No,
I’m a legend.. I have a history those same boys are astonished with
my history, and they wonder why I changed, I was the cloud above
those boys..
I
was a solid warrior and I fought and have a horrible history whether
inside Egypt or outside it, I’m not just a lad, or someone who just
joined, I was everything in the organization..
– I
mean now after the Takfiri ideology (labeling people as Kuffar –
non-believers) why nobody tried to liquidate you with this Takfiri
ideology?
Nabeel
Naiem: This
is with God’s grace upon me, and then I have a history.. When they
get to know my history.. none of them have achieved the history I
did.
– Back
to the question, I understand you’re telling me the main structure
of Al-Qaeda does not exist anymore.. Are we talking now about
schism? Can we say that (Daesh) ISIS is part of Al-Qaeda?
Nabeel
Naiem: No,
the old commanders have left the whole organization, only Ayman is
left and around him a few we call them mentally retarded or crazy,
Takfiri people.. But all the founders have left, some died and the
others just left..
As
for ISIS, it follows the ideology of Al-Qaeda organization, which was
founded by Sayyed Imam Sherif and put it in his book Al Jamei Fi
Talab Al-ilm Al Sharif (Bible of Seeking Honorable Learning), &
it’s one of the most dangerous books circulated in the world, and
it’s translated to all languages by the way, Kurdish, Urdu,
Persian, Turkish.. etc.
– You
say that ISIS is a branch of Al-Qaeda?
Nabeel
Naiem: It
adopts the ideology of Al-Qaeda. ISIS was established in 2006, we
created Al-Qaeda since 1989.
– Explain
to me now the position of Dr. Ayman Zawahri from ISIS and Abu Bakr
Baghdadi (head of ISIS), what do they consider him?
Nabeel
Naiem: He
(Zawahri) asked Abu Bakr Baghdadi to pledge allegiance to him (as the
Emir..) but Abu Bakr Baghdadi, since he’s basically a U.S. agent,
told him: we are the people of cause, the cause of liberating Iraq,
Syria and so.. You’re the one who should pledge allegiance to us,
Ayman (Zawahri) refused so there was a dispute and a fight between
them.
– How
he is an American agent? Explain to us how?
Nabeel
Naiem: It
is known that the USA released him from prison and he spent 20 to 30
million US Dollars to establish these ISIS groups and the first ISIS
camps were established in Jordan, and Jordan doesn’t allow camps
for charity, when Jordan establish camps to train terrorist groups,
it doesn’t do that out of good will and charity, these camps were
supervised by the Marines, and the arming of ISIS is all American..
and how do they arrange their expenses? I was in charge of a camp
of 120 men, we were spending thousands of thousands (of
dollars).. food, drinks, weapons, munition, training..
– Excuse
me, you’re talking about ISIS? You were in charge of an ISIS camp?
Nabeel
Naiem: No,
I am telling you I was once in charge of a camp of 120 men and we
were spending that time thousands (of Dollars), imagine how much this
ISIS is spending?! Let me tell you something.. The wounded from ISIS
during (terrorist) operations, are they being treated here in
Lebanon? No, neither in Syria, nor in Saudi nor in Egypt, where do
they go? They go to Israel. Now as we speak there are 1,500 of ISIS &
Nusra (Front) are in Tel Aviv hospitals.
– From
where this information?
Nabeel
Naiem: Where
are their wounded? Don’t they have wounded? Where are they being
treated? This is well known..
– They
have field hospitals, and it’s remarkable that they have a number
of doctors in their ranks, even doctors from European
countries..
Nabeel
Naiem: Yes,
the field doctor would only give first aid until you reach the
hospital.
– You
mentioned an important point about financing, I read for your a lot
actually when at the beginning of Al-Qaeda when talking about Osama
Bin Laden you were talking about self-financing..
Nabeel
Naiem: Osama
was spending by himself, but before Osama there was the International
Islamic Relief Organization and the connection between us and them
was Dr. Abdulla Azzam, then we had some issues with Adbulla Azzam so
he cut off from us the money and expenses so we replaced him with
Osama Bin Laden, and the brothers in Al-Qaeda, mainly from the GCC
countries called him Emir of Arabs.
– You
just mentioned that 120 members required thousands, we are talking
about a structure spread worldwide, could this be understood in the
context of self-financing reaching ISIS today? I’ll read what the
British Independent Newspaper said, it reveals there are a number of
donors from Saudi who played an essential role in establishing
Jihadist groups since over 30 years, that’s why I ask you about the
beginnings as you were there then.. It’s a CIA report and it’s
after September 11 attacks and it suggests Al-Qaeda had relied on
middlemen who collected money from Saudi & other GCC donors..
Nabeel
Naiem: This
is ‘crap’ what the Independent says, these are foolish people, a
fool journalist who doesn’t know what to say. First of all, the
donations of GCC citizens to the Jihadist groups in Afghanistan was
known and done publicly and it was advertised in newspapers and on
TV, what is this Independent guy adding?
I’m
one of the people who took more than a thousand free air tickets from
the International Islamic Relief Organization
– Please
explain what are you aiming at with the International Islamic Relief
Org.?
Nabeel
Naiem: It
was paying our expenses while we were in the Afghani Jihad, bring
weapons, ammunition, training, food, drinks.. all of this we were
getting from the Islamic Relief Org.. they were spending..
– This
is what I meant, Islamic Relief Org. is specialized in collecting
Zakat (charity) and it’s in Saudi (Arabia)..
Nabeel
Naiem: These
are fools.. Prince Sulaiman Bin Abdul Aziz was in charge of it, it
was not running loose you just grab what you want and go on.. It was
Saudi Intelligence and Prince Sulaiman Bin Abdul Aziz was in charge
of it, it wasn’t a loose charity you fill your pockets and walk,
No.
Secondly,
there was a hospital called Kuwaiti Crescent Hospital, it had 250
beds, it had all kinds of operations, and it had doctors employed
there, money (budget), medicine, used to spend millions, it was under
Kuwaiti (Red) Crescent.
So
what new this Independent is telling? USA itself was supporting
Hikmatyar.. Who brought Stinger missiles to the Afghani Mujahideen?
The missiles which badly hurt the USSR? It was brought in by the
USA..
– This
is the point you mentioned when talking about Al-Qaeda, USA supported
Al-Qaeda because it was fighting Russia, today when we come closer to
this region, who supports who in favor of who? ISIS works for who?
Nabeel
Naiem: Look,
there’s nothing constant in these matters, take for example after
Russia was defeated (in Afghanistan) the Americans wanted to get rid
of the Arab Afghanis, and in fact the Arab Afghanis were arrested,
deported and some like us were jailed, so Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan was
struck by September 11 attacks and after Osama Bin Laden’s death
Al-Qaeda was bought by the Qatari Intelligence, and I tell you during
the International Conference of Ikhwan (Muslim Brotherhood) in
Istanbul, Qatar decided to create a fund to sponsor Free Egyptian
Army and paid 1 billion dollar for it, and the person in charge of
this fund is Ali Kurrah Zadah, Muslim Brotherhood official in Turkey,
this is the finance, not like someone says 1 sheikh is donating..!
– This
is one side, what’s important to know is what ISIS wants from Iraq?
Is it the issue of borders? The borders strategy? Borders war? But
this ideology is trans-borders it seems, how did ISIS expand from
Syria into Iraq? What does it want exactly from Iraq?
Nabeel
Naiem: No
dear, ISIS started in Iraq, and Ibrahim Abu Bakr Baghdadi is Iraqi
(national), and after that they were given camps to train in Jordan
and they smuggled into Syria from Jordan and they were defeated in
Syria then they moved back into Iraq once again.
As
to what’s happening in Iraq, it’s bigger than ISIS, Mosul city
has 4 million residents & it’s second largest province, in Iraq
there’s a problem between the Arabs in Anbar and (Prime Minister)
Maliki, and ‘Maliki Army’, who handed over their weapons, had
Shiite commanders, so nobody would argue ISIS and Shiites, those
commanders handed over their weapons to Arab tribes but ISIS is in
the headlines.
ISIS
has something called Management of Savagery, a book titled Management
of Savagery..
– We
have shown some details about this book on our channel..
Nabeel
Naiem: Abu
Bakr Muhammad Maqdisi in this book has taken the same policy of
Genghis Khan, thanks God they didn’t claim they derived their
policies from prophet Muhammad, because God said: ‘There has
certainly been for you in the Messenger of Allah an excellent pattern
for anyone whose hope is in Allah and the Last Day and [who]
remembers Allah often.’ [Quran 33:21].. So their ‘excellent
pattern’ was Genghis Khan.
Genghis
Khan used to enter a village and annihilates all living in it, even
animals he’d slaughter it, and burn down the houses, so the next
village hears that Genghis Khan is coming they flee away and this is
what ISIS is doing in Iraq, and what’s the goal of ISIS? When ISIS
entered Samerra they killed a thousand Sunni, and now killing
Shiites, and this is the American policy.
Henry
Kissinger wrote a memo in 1982 or 1984, don’t remember exactly,
it’s titled The 100 Years War. When asked where this 100 years war
will occur? He said in the Middle East when we ignite the war between
the Sunnah and the Shiites.
So
they’re working on igniting the war between the Sunna and the
Shiites, just like what Abu Mussab (Zarqawi) used to blow up Sunnah
mosques then blow up Shiite mosques, to start the sectarian war in
the region; and this is of course an American plot, and I tell you
ISIS didn’t kill a single American.
ISIS
didn’t behead a single American and didn’t play football with his
head, they beheaded Muslims and ate livers of Muslims and didn’t
kill a single American though it’s established since 2006..
– You’re
talking about ISIS’s brutality and ideology but it finds popularity
among the youth.. and popularity among many sides and it practices
the highest level of violence and brutality, can you explain to us
what makes all these groups with all its diversities to join this
organization?
Nabeel
Naiem: It’s
the Takfiri ideology, the problem with this Takfiri ideology it’s
widely spread among the European Muslims, why?
I
sat with them.. The European Muslims denounced everything they saw in
Europe..
– But
they also come from GCC countries and Islamic countries even..
Nabeel
Naiem: I’m
with you, it’s spread among the Muslims in Europe and it’s spread
in Saudi because Wahhabism is the closest to Takfir than others. And
when I sat with them I found out they have a single-sided Takfiri
thinking, like when I spoke with Sayyed Imam in the judgment against
the ruler’s assistants, where he said there’s no ruler who can
rule by himself, he must have the support of the police and army thus
the police & army are all also Kuffar (infidels) like him, so I
asked what about who goes to the polls to elect the ruler? He
replied: He’s a Kafir (infidel).
I
told him: you have labeled the Army, police and the people as Kuffar
(infidels), you’re a Takfiri..
The
religion (Islam) is not so strict, it includes prevention excuses
like ignorance, circumstances, causes.. they didn’t study all this,
for them the ruler is an infidel that means all of those with him are
infidels.. Bashar (Assad) is a Nusairi then all of those with him are
Nusairis, although that the Syrian Army 90% of it is Sunni, because
that’s the Sunni percentage of Syrians.
But
they are one-sided thinking and they’re ignorant..
– Ignorant
in what sense?
Nabeel
Naiem: Ignorant
of the religion (Islam). I was living with Ayman (Zawahri), Ayman is
ignorant, he wasn’t saying anything without consulting me first..
– In
spite that you mentioned that Ayman Zawahri was refusing at one stage
of time to accept the Takfiris (in Al-Qaeda)..
Nabeel
Naiem: Yes,
we were the ones who didn’t allow them. I told him: If your brother
Muhammad joins the organization we will dissolve it because your
brother is Takfiri. So he agreed until we entered jail and we’re
separated, his brother came in and took over the whole organization,
and his brother is retarded actually, he’s Takfiri and retarded, if
you talk with him you feel you’re talking with someone who is
brainless..
– That’s
what’s strange as I mentioned we’re talking about different
segments of societies from different countries and even from
different education levels, we see PHD holders, how do you call all
of these ignorant?
Nabeel
Naiem: Ignorance
in religion is something and being a doctor is something else.. I’ll
give you an example. If I’m a doctor in a clinic, and with me is a
nurse, and for 30 years he will be with me, will he become a doctor
after 30 years?
Will
this nurse become a doctor after 30 years being a nurse?
– This
is as a description, right?
Nabeel
Naiem: They’re
like this, they educate themselves by themselves, they’re like the
nurses, they’ll never become doctors. I am specialized in Islamic
Sharia, for me he’s ignorant, ignorant in the religion, he doesn’t
understand the religion.
– We
should explain, you’re talking about Jihad? Salafist Jihad or
Takfiris? These are the segments?
Nabeel
Naiem: Yes,
they’re ignorant..
– All
of them?
Nabeel
Naiem: I
argued with their top sheikh (cleric) – Salafists, Salafist
Jihadist and Takfiris, these are 3 different samples, all of
them are ignorant?
They’re
not different they’re all ignorant, I was living with Sayyed Imam
Sharif, he’s the international founder of the whole ideology spread
in the region from Jakarta to Nouakchott (in Mauritania), he wrote
them a book titled ‘Al Jamei Fi Talab Al-ilm Al-Sharif (Bible in
Seeking Honorable Learning), this book is the manifest and ideology
of all the Takfiri groups like ISIS, Nusra Front, Ansar Bet Maqdas
(Jerusalem House Supporters), Salafist Jihadist, and all of those you
can imagine, and nobody wrote after the book of Sayyed Imam (Sharif).
I
debated with Sayyed Imam and debated with him about a lot of matters,
he told me in the next edition of the book he will rectify &
mention the comments I said, he didn’t, he re-issued the book as it
is.
I
also argued with someone a Takfiri just for sins, a sin is
infidelity, like the one committing adultery doesn’t do so and he’s
a believer thus he’s a Kafir (infidel), so I argued with him: the
punishment for the believer who becomes a disbeliever (leaves Islam)
is death, and the adulterer’s punishment is flogging, how does the
punishment differ (when committing a sin only)?
The
differ in ideology and thinking is long since the beginnings, after
Osama Bin Laden (era) between (Ayman) Zawahri & (Abu Bakr)
Maqdisi, which resulted in the schism among other organizations, but
when we talk now about ISIS, if we compare them with Al-Qaeda,
there’s an essential difference between them..
There’s
no difference in ideology, only organizational difference..
– Then
what is the future of ISIS based on?
Nabeel
Naiem: As
long as the youth are convinced with the Takfir ideology, ISIS will
continue.
Secondly,
ISIS is playing on 2 levels: Bashar Assad (Syrian president) is a
Nusairi infidel & should be fought, and they use the Fatwas
(religious judicial opinion) of Ibn Taymiyyah in regards with the
Nusairi sect..
– Depending
on feeding these thoughts will ensure its continuity, and maybe other
interests..
Nabeel
Naiem: And
oil.. All sorts of feeding: intellectual, money, gears, munition, all
of that.. As long as there are sources feeding this ideology ISIS
will continue..
Bernard
Lewis founder of Fourth-Generation Warfare said so, he said: we do
not need trans-continent armies that would awake nationalism and they
return to us as bodies like what happened in Afghanistan &
Vietnam, but we should find agents inside the (targeted) country who
will carry out the task of the soldiers, and we need a media tool to
falsify truths for the people, and money to spend on them..
This
is the Fourth-Generation Warfare, agents instead of soldiers..
– This
is an alternative army, a war by proxy?
Nabeel
Naiem: Yes
of course.
– Between
who (this war)? We are talking about armies on the ground, Al Qaeda
and all what branches out of it, these armies work for the account of
which battle and between who?
Nabeel
Naiem: It
works for the US Intelligence (CIA).
– Who
it fights?
Nabeel
Naiem: The
regimes, they put a plan in 1998 called Clean Break (PNAC)..
– In
Iraq, who is it fighting? Is it fighting Nouri Maliki (Iraqi PM)?
Nabeel
Naiem: It
fights both Sunnah and Shiites, when they entered Sammerra, Sheikh
Ali Hatimi, head of Anbar Tribes said: ISIS entered Sammerra and
killed a thousand Sunni in cold blood.. and it kills Shiites and
kills Christians and kills whoever it faces, ISIS considers all
people infidels and their bloods are free.
Who
killed Imam Ali appropriated his blood, who slaughtered Hussein
wasn’t he a Muslim and from a sect that claims they’re Islamist?
All
these have a shameless historic extension, the prophet PBuH called
them Dogs of Hell, the prophet said: ‘if I meet them I will kill
them the same killing of ‘Aad and Iram of the Pillars’, those are
the ones behind these ideologies, the ideologies of Khawarij (outlaws
in Islam) who the prophet warned of them, and these will continue, as
for ISIS, ISIS did not kill a single American. The opposition
fighting Bashar Al-Assad fiercefully for 3 years did not shoot a
single bullet against Israel..
– What
makes the close enemy, so to speak, in the ideology of these groups,
the close enemy is these countries and its leaders, geographically
speaking, this term as close enemy and far enemy exists in Al-Qaeda,
you mentioned Israel which is not far geographically, what makes it
far for them?
Nabeel
Naiem: No,
they don’t say this, they say: fighting an apostate is a more
priority than fighting the original infidel, close and far that’s
an old saying.. The apostate is us now..
– As
per their understanding?
Nabeel
Naiem: Yes,
we are apostate, the Arab rulers are apostate, the Arab armies are
apostate, thus fighting the apostate is a priority over fighting the
original infidel, the Jew.
For
instance, Issam Hattito, head of Muslim Brotherhood responsible for
leading the battles against Bashar Assad, where does he reside? Is he
in Beirut? Riyadh or Cairo? He’s residing in Tel Aviv.
Ahmad
Jarba, does he stay in Riyadh, Cairo or Tehran? He’s moving between
New York, Paris and London, his employers, who pay his expenses..
When
Obama was exposed and it was learned that he’s arming ISIS and
Nusra Front with American and Turkish weapons said: ‘We will stop
the arming because the American weaposn were leaked to Nusra..’
Didn’t Obama say that?
Leaked?!
You discovered it was leaked after 2 years war?!
Nusra
Front fighters are 10,000 and ISIS fighters are another 10,000, all
20,000 fighters using American weapons, and Obama claims after 2
years he discovers his (American) weapons are leaked to them?! Are
you thinking we are fools?
When
Obama Raised the Muslim Brotherhood
This
is a conspiracy against the region, and I told you Netenyahu &
Dick Chenney put the Clean Break plan in the year 1998, and it’s
destroying 4 countries, they start with Iraq, then Syria then Egypt
then Saudi Arabia. It’s called Clean Break plan (PNAC), well
known.. Using radical groups in the region.
The
legal case (former Egyptian president) Mohammad Morsi is being tried
for, the case of communicating (with the enemy) and contacting Ayman
Zawahri was an assignment of Issam Haddad by Obama in person on 28
December 2012, he was at the White House in a meeting with the CIA,
he says in his confessions when interrogated by the public
prosecution in the case..
– How
did you get it?
Nabeel
Naiem: These
public prosecution confessions are published and are available..
Obama entered (the meeting room) and gave the CIA team a paper and
left, they read it and told him: it’s required by the Muslim
Brotherhood to contain the radical groups in the region starting with
Hamas & Al-Qaeda, so he called Ayman Zawahri through Rifa’a
Tahtawi, head of presidential court, who happens to be Ayman’s
cousin from Rifa’a Tahtawi’s phone.
Ayman
(Zawahri) talking to Mohammad Morsi and Morsi says to him: Peace be
Upon You Emir (Prince) of Believers, we need your people here in
Sinai, and I will provide them with expenses, food and water and
prevent security from pursuing them..
This
was recorded and sent to the public prosecutor and this is what
Mohammad Morsi is being tried for.
If
you ask how I got to know this? I was in Channel 2 of Egyptian TV,
and with me was General Gamal, 1st secretary of Egyptian
Intelligence, who recorded the call and written it down and based on
it the memo was written and handed to the Public Prosecutor.
The
TV presenter asked him: Is it allowed for the Intelligence Services
to tap the telephone of the president of the republic?
He
replied: I’m not tapping the president’s phone, I was tapping
Ayman’s (Zawahri) phone and found the president talking to him,
telling him Peace be Upon You Emir of Believers, so I wrote down the
tape, wrote a report and submitted to the head of intelligence..
She
asked him: Did you inform the president? He replied: It’s not my
job, I do not deal with the president (directly), I deal with the
head of intelligence and that’s my limits.
She
asked him: What did you write in your investigations and your own
report, what did you write after you wrote down the tape (contents)?
I
swear to God he told her, & I was in the same studio,: I wrote
that Mr. Mohammad Morsi Ayyat president of the republic is a danger
for Egypt’s National Security.
So
the ignorant should know why the army stood by the side of the people
on 30 June, because the president is dealing with Al-Qaeda
organization, and it’s recorded, and he’s being on trial for it
now, and head of intelligence wrote that the president of the
republic is a danger on Egypt’s National Security.
This
is the task of these groups in the region. When Obama said he
supported Morsi’s campaign with 50 million (Dollars), and when
(Yousuf) Qaradawi said: Obama sent us 60 million Dollars for the
Syrian ‘Resistance’, God bless you Obama, and we need more..
Did
Obama convert to Islam or America became a Hijabi (wore a burqa,
veil)?
I
ask Qaradawi: When Obama supports the Syrian opposition, is it to
establish the Caliphate? And return the days of the Rashideen
Caliphates? Or Obama converted to Islam or America became a Hijabi to
support the Syrian opposition?
This
is the work of agents (spies), exposed and debunked, and we don’t
want to fool ourselves and hide our heads in the sand, the region is
under a conspiracy and it’s to drag Iran to a war of attrition..
The
first statement ISIS announced after the fight with Maliki it said:
‘We will head to Najaf & Karballa and destroy the sacred
shrines’, they dragged the legs of Iran (into Iraq).
Iran
said they’ll defend the sacred shrines, it has to, it cannot (not
defend them), this is what’s required,
It’s
required to clash Saudi and Iran in the 100 years war, an endless
war, it exhausts Saudi resources and its monies, and it exhausts Iran
resources and its monies, like what they did during the days of
Saddam in Iraq (with Iran). This is what we should understand, fight
and stand against..
– You
mentioned Egypt, Syria and Iraq, we see in all of it similar
activities, and you also mentioned Saudi, is it in a coming phase
Saudi will be targeted?
Nabeel
Naiem: It
was meant when Muslim Brotherhood lay their ground in ruling Egypt,
problems would start in Saudi in 2016 and in the whole Gulf (GCC),
this is not my words, this what the head of national security in
United Arab Emirates Dhahi Khalfan said, he arrested those who
confessed.
From
where did Dhahi Khalfan get this? They arrested cells which confessed
in details: If Muslim Brotherhood settles in Egypt, they’ll start
exporting problems to the Gulf (GCC) through their existing cells,
and destabilize the security of the Gulf, and this is what Dhahi
Khalfan, head of national security in UAE said, not what I say.
– The
circumstances and factors we saw in Cairo, Damascus and Baghdad, in
the countries: Syria, Egypt and Iraq, there was a security vacuum and
repercussions of so called Arab Spring, what vacuum we are talking
about in Saudi Arabia? Where to find the circumstances and factors
that would allow these organizations to enter the (Saudi) kingdom?
Opening gaps? Where?
Nabeel
Naiem: Look,
they have a book being circulated in London titled The Rule of Al
Saud, in this book they called the Saudi family as Kuffar (infidels),
and that it is unjust, and it steals the monies of the Saudis, and
it’s an infidel doesn’t rule by God’s commands, and only
applies Sharia law on the weak while the strong and the princess no
law being applied on them, a book to educate the Saudi youths abroad
to fight a war against the Saudi government, they also say: we call
on the kingdom to become a constitutional monarchy, ie. the king
doesn’t rule, like the British queen, and this trend is being
supported by America and Britain and the people working on this are
residing in London, the nest of spies, all the spies of the world
reside in London..
Their
goal is to divide the region in order to achieve Israel’s security.
Israel
is a weak and despicable state, by the way, geopolitical, Israel is
not a state, like Qatar, is Qatar a state? Qatar is only a tent and a
man sitting it with his money and that’s it..
There
are countries like Iran, Saudi and Egypt, in geography it exists
until the end of times, and there are countries called the Satanic
Shrubs, it’s just found you don’t know how, like Israel and
Qatar, it can vanish in one day and you won’t find it..
So
for Israel to guarantee its existence, all the surrounding entities
around it should be shredded.. Kurds to take one piece, Sunnah take
one piece, Maliki takes one piece.. each sect has their own piece
just like Lebanon they keep fighting between each other, once they
finish beating each other they drink tea then go for a second round
beating each other..
– I
want to get back to the factors in regards with the Saudi Kingdom,
you mentioned what is planned for based on this ideology, and you
know better, you have experience and you talk about examples and
evidences, but how they will enter?
True
there was a statement by the Saudi ministry of interior in last May
claiming they dismantled a cell that follows ISIS of 62 members, as
they stated, but how they’ll enter (Saudi), what are the factors
they’ll be depending on to enter?
Nabeel
Naiem: I’m
telling you they are preparing for the revolution against the ruling
family, that it’s a corrupt family, this family steals the money of
the Saudis, talks about the roots of the family..
– From
inside the kingdom?
Nabeel
Naiem: From
inside the kingdom, and there are strong Takfiri members inside the
kingdom, because as you know the difference beteween Wahhabi and
Takfiri ideologies is as thin as a single hair, thus there are a lot
of youths who follow this (Takfiri) ideology, add to it the feeding
against the kingdom and its government and against the ruling family,
it’s very easy for him to blow himself up with anything..
– So
it will be only based on these factors, we don’t want to disregard
an important point that groups of the ISIS are from the Gulf
countries, and there are reports that the (governments of GCC) are
turning a blind eye away from recruiting a number of them and sending
them to fight in Syria and in a number of other countries including
Iraq, as per these reports, could there be recruiting to use inside
the kingdom? To move inside the kingdom?
Nabeel
Naiem: Yes,
yes, most are Saudis & the move will be like that but they were
hoping for the Muslim Brotherhood government in Egypt to settle in
power, that’s why when (Saudi) king Abdallah supported the 30 June
revolution (in Egypt), he did so based on the information he has of
what will happen in the region
Why
did he stand against the Muslim Brotherhood? Saudi was always
containing the MBs, and if the MBs (Muslim Brotherhood) ever made
money, it was from Saudi, and Mohammad Qotb, the father of all Takfir
in the world, spent 40 years of his life in Saudi, he wrote a book
called The Ignorance in the Twentieth Century, and he claims we’re
living in an ignorance more than the one in the days of the prophet
PBuH, and Saudi hosted him and he was teaching in the university..
What made them go against them (MBs)?
Because
the Muslim Brotherhood have no religion, no nation, not safe to be
with them, they’ll betray anyone.
– On
the other hand, how to deal with such an organization and such an
ideology?
Nabeel
Naiem: The
voices of the Islamic moderation very low, throaty, so to speak..
– We
do not hear that loud voice who would stand against them, is it not
convincing? Or need mediums?
Nabeel
Naiem: No,
the sapien voice doesn’t have a vim, they’re employees, they’d
say let ISIS burn out with who brought it..
It
doesn’t have the vim to respond, doesn’t feel the danger,
secondly, Azhar in Egypt, which was leading the movement of religious
enlightenment, is absented for the past 40 years, the reason for its
absent for 40 years is the oil boom, and the voices of the Saudi
clergy becoming higher than the Azhar clergy. Salafism was found in
Egypt just to fight Azhar (Islamic University), then, the scholars
duty is to respond to the ideology of ISIS, detail it and respond to
it, scholars should come and say this is what ISIS is saying and the
right respond is this.. and I sat with people who came from London to
fight in Syria, they sat with me and thanks to God they went from
Egypt back to London.
They
came to ask me, and I told them, let’s assume that Bashar (Assad)
died in the morning, would I be saying: Why God did you take Bashar
while the war is not over yet? Who will replace Bashar?
They
replied: (Ahmad) Jarba..
I
said: Jarba is worth of Bashar shoes only.. They said: true. And they
went back.
I
told them you are going to fight in favor of America and Israel, will
you be the one to rule Syria?
If
you were the one who will rule Syria I will come and fight on your
side, I swear by God I’ll come and fight on your side..
But
are you going to rule Syria after Bashar? He said no, I told him you
are being used to remove Bashar and then Jarba, Salim Idress, Issam
Hattito will come, all of those are being raised in the spy nest in
London, it’s not you who will rule.
– How
can we differentiate between religious commitment and the national
responsibility? Is there a problem in combining both?
Nabeel
Naiem: Yes,
yes, of course, there is a strong fault between the national
responsibility and the religious commitment. I’ll tell you what the
General Guide (leader) of (Muslim) Brotherhood said? He said Toz
(B.S.) with Egypt. This is their vision of the national
responsibility.
And
when the MBs ruled Egypt.. I’ll give you one evidence for their
despise to the nation (Egypt), in the last interview done by the
Consular Adli Mansour, the interim president of Egypt with Mrs. Lamis
Hadidi, the last question she asked him was about the background
picture of the map of Egypt behind him, she asked him to tell her the
story about this picture behind him..
He
said: this picture was done by King Fouad a 100 years ago, we know
that first was King Fouad, then King Farouq then Abdul Nasser, Sadat
then Mubarak. He told her since King Fouad did this photo a 100 years
ago and it’s hanged there, it was removed for 1 year only, when the
Muslim Brotherhood ruled Egypt. They removed it and put in the
stores..
And
they were working on a plot to concede 600 square kilometers to Hamas
to resolve the Palestinian cause..
There
is a link between the national responsibility and the religious
commitment, and this contradicts with the understanding of the
Salafists clerics, and I’ll tell you the political theory of imam
Ibn Taymiyyah, who people consider him the most strict imam, Ibn
Taymiyyah was asked: if the nation’s interest conflicts with
applying Sharia, if we apply Sharia will lose the country, what to
do?
He
said: Maintaining the homeland is a priority over applying Sharia,
because if you lose the country, where will you apply Sharia?
I’ll
give you an example to make it clearer, if someone is naked and will
fall from the 10th floor, will you rescue him or get him something to
wear?
Thus,
to preserve the country is more important than to apply Sharia if
there’s interest conflict.
– And
the interest now?
Nabeel
Naiem: To
preserve the nation.
– And
in fact this is the most absented side between the politics, we
called the national responsibility and..
Nabeel
Naiem: This
is because of ignorance, not knowing what’s the national
responsibility, there’s no conflict between national responsibility
and religious commitment, it’s because those are ignorants the
conflict is happening between the nation and the belief.
– This
topic needs more discussing, especially in regards with the relations
with regional countries, western countries, in regards with the
nature of these countries, its backgrounds and its beliefs, we see
relations are allowed with India and China, and when we talk about
countries like Iran then the religious backgrounds are mentioned and
this also might require further research if possible we can get a
comment from you on it?
Nabeel
Naiem: What
I want to tell you, the efforts of all Islamic countries, Sunnah and
Shiites, must combine, to eradicate these groups, because these
groups are the claws of colonialism in the region, it’s not on
religious bases, there are members of ISIS who do not pray, so in
Al-Qaeda, there are members who didn’t pray a single kneeling,
there must be a combination of the countries efforts to organically
eliminate these groups by security and by intellect, disprove their
ideology..
There
must be a response to these groups and explaining its ideology is a
stray ideology, contrary to the Islamic Sharia, and this is the
ideology that the prophet warned from when he said about Khawarij
(Outlaws in Islam):
‘Newly
in the religion, ribald in their aims, they go through the religion
like how an arrow goes through the bow, if I meet them I will kill
them the way Iram and A’ad were killed, they’re the worse killers
under the skies, blessed who they kill or who kills of them..’ and
he called them: ‘the dogs of hell.’
– Thank
you a lot sheikh Nabil Naiem, our guest here in the studio, founder
of Jihad Organization formerly, and expert in the Islamist groups.
– end
of interview.
Yours
truly kept saying: ‘They
fool you, they keep fooling you and they enjoy fooling you, not
because they’re smart, but because you’re foolable‘,
so I repeat it once again.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.