Demcracy in our liberal fascist country in action! - lol
This has no popular or political support. The military do not like it and the Iraqis are not playing ball - but Key wants it so it's going to be pushed through, with a debate and no vote because the outcome is predetermined - with only one ACT MP in favour it would lose the vote.
Up
to 100 Kiwi troops poised to join war in Iraq
New Zealand
is poised to join the war in Iraq with the deployment of Kiwi troops
to the region to train local forces.
A
DECADE AGO: Prime Minister Helen Clark visited Kiwi troops serving on
Operation Telic II in Basra, Iraq in November 2003. Whangarei soldier
Sapper Aaron Butler greeted the PM with the Wero.
21
February, 2015
Cabinet
is expected to agree in principle to the deployment on Monday after
concerns were eased over the Iraqi Government's refusal to sign a
"status of forces" agreement setting out the legal status
of the New Zealand troops.
Alternatives
including "diplomatic passports with guns" or special
military or official passports are understood to be under discussion
and sources say they should provide the level of legal protection
demanded by the New Zealand government as a condition of sending
troops.
But
that could be controversial - the former commander of New Zealand
troops in Afghanistan, retired Colonel Richard Hall, said settling
the legal position of New Zealand troops was crucial before any
deployment.
"The
Status of Forces agreement gives you your legitimacy; if you don't
have one - if you take if from the ultimate end of the spectrum -
you're actually an occupying force. It's rather like Russian soldiers
turning up in New Zealand with weapons. They have no jurisdiction,
no legality to be here, no legality to wear [weapons] and shouldn't
be wearing uniforms and so on."
The
contingent of as many as 100 troops will be based alongside
Australian and other forces at the US military base Camp Taji north
of Baghdad. It will include combat trained soldiers to provide "force
protection" and a small army of logistics people, including
command centre staff and intelligence people.
But
the deployment is deeply opposed by Opposition parties who have
warned that it could drag New Zealand into another long and bloody
conflict, just two years after Kiwi troops were pulled from Bamyan,
Afghanistan, a decade after the American invasion.
The
divisions over Iraq are so deep Prime Minister John Key is likely to
seek a Parliamentary debate without a vote, in stark contrast to 2003
when Helen Clark sought Parliament's backing to send the SAS to
Afghanistan.
Clark
said she did not need to put it to the vote but she wanted the troops
to know they had the backing of Parliament. Every party except the
Greens voted in favour.
But
with Labour, NZ First, the Greens, United Future and the Maori Party
lined up against sending troops to Iraq, the Government can only
count on ACT, meaning it would almost certainly lose a vote because
it has one vacant seat due to the resignation of Northland MP Mike
Sabin.
Meanwhile
across the Tasman
Government
denies report Tony Abbott called for Iraq troop surge
Prime
Minister Tony Abbott said it was "fanciful" that he would
unilaterally propose sending a large number of Australian troops to
fight Islamic State in Iraq without any international co-operation.
21
February, 2015
"We
do not act unilaterally in the Middle East," he told reporters
in Darwin.
According
to the report in The Australian, in a meeting on November 25 last
year, Mr Abbott suggested a unilateral invasion of Iraq by about 3500
ground troops to help stop the advance of Islamic State forces
through the ravaged country.
But
the idea was reportedly shot down by government military advisors,
who were stunned the Prime Minister would suggest endangering
Australian troops with no NATO or US cover to assist them.
According
to the report, the advisors pointed out that such a move would make
Australia the only Western country with troops on the ground in a
disintegrating Iraq.
The
report included a statement from the Prime Minister's office which
did not deny the extraordinary report, which could raise fresh
questions about the Prime Minister's judgement.
But
Finance Minister Mathias Cormann said the statement supplied by the
Prime Minister's office was not in direct response to the allegation
put in the report, and was therefore out of context.
"My
advice is the journalist who wrote that story actually never put that
proposition to the Prime Minister's office when seeking comment,"
he said.
Treasurer
Joe Hockey was also on the offensive this morning, taking to Twitter
to refute the story.
The
Australian's editor, Clive Mathieson, told Fairfax Media: "The
Australian stands by the story 100 per cent. The Prime Minister's
office was alerted to our questions verbally on Thursday afternoon
and in writing on Friday morning."
PM
suggested Iraq invasion: the Weekend Australian reports
20
February, 2015
PRIME
Minister Tony Abbott suggested sending 3500 troops to Iraq so
Australia could combat the Islamic State terrorist group alone, a new
report has found.
A
Weekend Australian investigation has found that Mr Abbott pitched the
idea at a meeting attended by his chief of staff Peta Credlin in
Canberra on November 25.
The
paper says that after he received no resistance from Ms Credlin or
other members of his staff, he raised the idea with Australia’s
military officials.
The
Weekend Australian report says that Mr Abbott was told that a
unilateral push from Australia would make it the only country with
troops on the ground in Iraq.
The
officials told the prime minister that it would be disastrous for the
3500 Australian soldiers to be in Iraq fighting ISIS without support
from the US or NATO.
A
spokesman for Mr Abbott told the Weekend Australian: “The Prime
Minister has consistently said that the Australian government will
continue to talk to the government of Iraq and to our coalition
partners about what Australia can usefully do to make the world a
safer place and to make Australia a safer country.”
The
reported suggestion by Mr Abbott to send Australian troops to Iraq is
likely to call into question his judgment having just survived a
motion for a leadership spill.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.