John Key takes NewJohn
Key takes New Zealand to war
He believed Mr Little's objections were simply politicking and if it was in Government, it would have deployed the troops as the former Labour Government had sent engineers to Iraq and the SAS in a combat role to Afghanistan.
Mr Key said he believed if Mr Little was Prime Minister he would also have allowed the deployment. He pointed out that when it was in Government, Labour sent 60 army engineers to Iraq and deployed the SAS in a combat role to Afghanistan.
The blistering attack came after Mr Key announced he was sending a non-combat training mission with Australia to Taji Camp, north of Baghdad in Iraq, to help train Iraqi troops fighting Isis.
He said New Zealand did not shy away from its responsibilities when the rule of law was under threat.
When
Key declares war today for a conflict he said he wouldn’t involve
us in before the election, every single NZer who voted National or
didn’t bother voting at all will be responsible. Our obligation as
citizens in a democracy is that we elect leaders who won’t turn the
power of the state into needless violence. With todays declaration of
war, we have failed in that obligation.
One of the country's foremost investigative journalists, Jon Stevenson, who with Nicky Hager revealed the true nature of NZ military presence in Afghanistan, reveals that NZ SAS troops are already in Iraq.
For some historical background for those less familiar with our PM this is what Key said (In opposition) about going to Iraq in 2003
And was caught out (not for the first or last time) lying by the then Labour government
'Get some guts and join the right side' - John Key lashes out as he sends NZ troops to Iraq for Isis fight
24
Febraury, 2015
Prime
Minister John Key has launched an angry counter-attack over Labour
leader Andrew Little's opposition to the deployment of troops to
Iraq, saying Mr Little needs to "get some guts" and
questioning whether he would make the right decisions for New
Zealand.
Mr
Key said Mr Little knew the numbers of New Zealanders considered
possible risks as extremists had increased from 30-40 last year to
60-70 now. There was also a greater risk to travelling New
Zealanders.
"But
he says he'd do nothing. I don't believe him. If it's really true
then you'd have to question whether he'd make the right decisions for
New Zealand."
He believed Mr Little's objections were simply politicking and if it was in Government, it would have deployed the troops as the former Labour Government had sent engineers to Iraq and the SAS in a combat role to Afghanistan.
Mr
Key said no country could simply sit by as the atrocities of Islamic
State continued.
"Get
some guts!" he told Mr Little in Parliament. He said the reason
Mr Little was opposing it was "because he wants politics to win
over what's right for the people".
Mr
Key said the opposition parties in the United Kingdom, Canada and
Australia had all supported military missions to combat Isil, yet
Labour was unable to do the same.
Mr Key said he believed if Mr Little was Prime Minister he would also have allowed the deployment. He pointed out that when it was in Government, Labour sent 60 army engineers to Iraq and deployed the SAS in a combat role to Afghanistan.
Mr
Little was not alone in condemning the mission in Parliament - the
leaders of the Greens, Maori Party, United Future, and NZ First also
opposed it.
Mr
Little had said Isil was not confined to Iraq and after 10 years of
training from the United States, Iraq's army was still in a mess. New
Zealand could make more of a difference in civil reconstruction,
helping build its agricultural sector and strengthening governance.
"We
will only deal with [Islamic State] when we deal with the underlying
causes and the underlying unrest that is spread across that region."
However,
Mr Key said Mr Little's proposal of sending civilians to do
reconstruction work on roads, farms and hospitals would put them in
more danger than the military would be. That work was outside secure
military compounds.
"You
can't do them inside the wire, sunshine."
The blistering attack came after Mr Key announced he was sending a non-combat training mission with Australia to Taji Camp, north of Baghdad in Iraq, to help train Iraqi troops fighting Isis.
Up
to 143 New Zealand personnel will be sent, although the deployment
will not be a badged mission. It will be reviewed after nine months
and last no more than two years.
Making
the announcement to Parliament this afternoon, Mr Key said of the
Islamic State or Isis fighters who have taken over parts of Iraq and
Syria and conducted barbaric killings: "This brutal group and
its distressing methods deserve the strongest condemnation."
He said New Zealand did not shy away from its responsibilities when the rule of law was under threat.
If
anything, Isis' brutality had worsened since his national security
speech last November.
NZDF
training. Photo / NZDF
Mr
Key said the ability of Isis to motivate Islamic radicals threatened
the security not just of the Middle East, but regionally and locally.
"New
Zealand is a country that stands up for its values. We stand up for
what's right.
"We have an obligation to support stability and the rule of law internationally.
"We do not shy away from taking our share of the burden when the international rules-based system is threatened.
"We have carved out our own independent foreign policy over decades and we take pride in it."
"We have an obligation to support stability and the rule of law internationally.
"We do not shy away from taking our share of the burden when the international rules-based system is threatened.
"We have carved out our own independent foreign policy over decades and we take pride in it."
Mr
Key said force protection would be deployed in Iraq to support New
Zealand's trainers.
Iraq
map. Photo / NZDF
Although
he had ruled out sending Special Air Service (SAS) troops to Iraq in
November, SAS soldiers might be deployed in Iraq "for short
periods" to protect the trainers.
Logistics
and medical support would also be sent to the Middle East.
"We
will secure the best protections we realistically can for our
personnel," Mr Key said.
Mr
Key said legal protections would be worked through with the Iraqi
Government in the coming weeks.
Foreign
Minister Murray McCully. Photo / Sarah Ivey
Foreign
Minister Murray McCully is expected to visit Baghdad to negotiate an
agreement with the Iraqi Government.
Mr
Key said New Zealand would appoint a new ambassador on
counter-terrorism, mirroring a move announced yesterday by Australian
Prime Minister Tony Abbott.
Mr
Key last year said there was a watchlist of 35 to 40 New Zealanders
"of concern in the foreign fighter context", and they
remained under surveillance.
An
additional group requiring further investigation was "growing in
number".
"We
have strengthened the ability of our intelligence agencies to deal
with this and they are taking steps to add to their resources.
"We
cannot be complacent, as events in Sydney, Paris and Ottawa have
underscored."
Mr
Key concluded his statement by saying New Zealand did not take its
commitment to Iraq lightly.
"In
return we expect that the Iraqi Government will make good on its
commitment to an inclusive government that treats all Iraqi citizens
with respect.
"Sending
our forces to Iraq is not an easy decision but it is the right
decision. They will go with our best wishes."
Defence
Minister Gerry Brownlee said the total estimated cost of a two-year
deployment was $65 million, though some costs had not yet been
finalised.
He
said New Zealand would expand its diplomatic and humanitarian support
in Iraq.
As
well as appointing a new counter-terrorism ambassador, the Government
was looking to base a diplomatic representative in Baghdad to serve
as a conduit between the Iraqi Government and New Zealand's military
deployment.
Taji
area map. Photo / NZDF
New
Zealand has committed $14.5 million so far in aid for people
displaced by fighting in Iraq and Syria.
Mr
McCully confirmed today that $1 million of this total would be used
for a pilot programme in Jordan which would provide basic education
for 1800 vulnerable young people.
Further
options for humanitarian support were also being considered.
'This is not a conventional enemy'
Labour
leader Andrew Little. Photo / Mark Mitchell
In
his reply to the Prime Minister's statement, Labour leader Andrew
Little said Labour could see no case for sending troops to Iraq.
He
said it was clear Islamic State was brutal. "There wouldn't be a
New Zealander who has seen those images whose stomachs have not been
turned. But let's be clear what we're dealing with. They call
themselves, Islamic State, but they are not a state. They run across
borders, they are cultural, ethnic, religious and driven by a number
of motivations."
He
said it was a "depository of the dispossessed, the extreme and
yes, the evil, but it is not a conventional enemy''.
Mr
Little said it was clear the Government had made its decision some
time ago "and I venture to suggest it was taken for a range of
reasons that have not been outlined today."
He
doubted Mr Key's assurances the training forces would be "behind
the wire". He said there was little doubt the troops would be
exposed to the wider combat and there was little to gain.
"After
10 years of training of the Iraq Army by the US Army, what impact
will we have? What can we hope to achieve? We think be sending a very
modest force, we are going to achieve what the US Army has not been
able to achieve in 10 years? We will not fix the Iraqi Army. It is
broken, it is corrupt."
He
said Iraq's foreign minister had told Labour that civil
reconstruction was just as critical. "No one will defeat Islamic
State through the Iraqi Army." That could only be achieved by
turning Iraq into a well-functioning state and developing industries
such as agriculture.
"NZ
has a reputation abroad as an honest broker. We won [the Security
Council seat] because of our reputations as a responsible, reputable
global citizen." He said NZ had an opportunity to provide
leadership in a way it had not before and should do that in Iraq.
Green
Party co-leader Dr Russel Norman. Photo / Mark Mitchell
Green
Party co-leader Dr Russel Norman said today's announcement "dragged
us by the bootlaces" into another Middle East war without a lack
of clear goals.
It
was a decision made in Washington, not Wellington, he said.
National
had prevented Parliament from voting on whether or not the country
should go to war, he said.
"It
makes no sense to enter a conflict that simply endangers New
Zealanders overseas or here...[John Key] does not have a mandate, and
he knows it."
Mr
Key was behaving as if he headed the 51st state of the United States,
Dr Norman said. It was therefore more correct to address the Greens'
protests to US president Barack Obama.
Dr
Norman said the United States' list of ills in the Middle East was a
long one that went some way to explaining the growth of extremism in
the region. "Every Western bomb that has been dropped on the
Middle East over the last half century...has only added to the ISIL
recruitment queue."
Sending
New Zealand troops to Iraq would not help in any way, he said, and
New Zealand needed to have the courage to tell that to the "head
of the club", the United States.
"When
it comes to Western military interventions in Iraq, New Zealand and
the world have been there and done that. It was a mess."
Dr
Norman said the deployment to Afghanistan was put to a vote in
Parliament in 2001, and this deployment should be too.
"We
correctly stayed out of the 2003 Iraq war. It is ridiculous that 12
years later we are being dragged into its aftermath.
"Not
even the Government's support partners think going to war is the
answer to the situation in Iraq, yet this is what John Key is willing
to do to be 'part of the club'."
Maori
Party co-leader Te Ururoa Flavell. Photo / Brett Phibbs
Maori
Party co-leader Te Ururoa Flavell said his party understood the
desire to assist in the fight in Iraq.
There
was a large scale humanitarian crisis in the Middle East, and New
Zealand had much to contribute - but not by sending our own troops.
The
Maori Party believed that sending personnel to train troops was
effectively the same as sending troops to participate, and would be
regarded as an act of aggression by Isis.
"We
are raising our heads effectively above the parapet."
Mr
Flavell said today's decision should be put in the context of past
conflicts including WWI. Maori had always been prominent in military
and peacekeeping missions.
"There
are stories of immense valour...there are stories of immense loss."
People
had asked him why New Zealand was joining the Iraq campaign, while
ignoring the situation in West Papua, a province in Indonesia where
many are seeking self-determination, Mr Flavell said.
"Despite
our views...we do wish our forces well...they will make us proud. We
pray that they will be looked after and return home safe."
Prime
Minister John Key and United Future leader Peter Dunne. Photo / Mark
Mitchell
United
Future leader Peter Dunne also believed the Government was making a
mistake, saying it was effectively now committing to a much
longer-term engagement than the two years set out.
His
concern about deploying almost 150 troops was escalation of the
conflict. "It is very difficult to control these sorts of
incursions, to protect just the goal we had to start with."
He
said Islamic State was unlikely to distinguish between combat
soldiers and trainers.
He
also doubted it would be over within two years. "We are
committing NZ personnel for what will be a long-term engagement and
we have to face the consequences of that."
Mr
Dunne said in the history of engagement in the Middle East the one
constant was that external intervention had invariably resulted in
failure. The consequence of that was the very disillusionment that
resulted in extremism.
"The
question is not whether we should do anything, but what can we do
constructively. We might feel good about making a contribution, but
we will not change anything."
Mr
Dunne said the same points had been raised in New Zealand through
successive debates on war, including in Iraq and Afghanistan. "We
should be using our role on the Security Council to ensure any action
which takes place against ISIL is UN-mandated."
The push to stop Isis: Timeline
2014
June
9: Islamic
State secures a major stronghold by capturing Mosul, Iraq's
second-largest city.
June
18: PM
John Key says NZ's only contribution to Iraq will be humanitarian
aid, and rules out deployment of SAS troops.
August
7: US
President authorises airstrikes against ISIS, beginning in northern
Iraq.
September
12: Australian
PM Tony Abbott raises terror threat level from "medium" to
"high" out of concern about domestic terror attacks.
September
29: PM
John Key says he cannot rule out NZ support for fight against Islamic
State after the US names NZ as part of a 60-country coalition. Key
says combat troops are unlikely.
October
6: Australia
joins fight against Islamic State with airstrikes in northern Iraq.
October
13: New
Zealand raises terror threat level from "very low" to "low"
in response to threat of foreign fighters returning to NZ to carry
out terror attacks. Govt announces review of intelligence and
security legislation.
November
5: In
a major speech on security, PM John Key reveals 80 New Zealanders are
linked to the Islamic State, 40 of whom are being closely watched. He
outlines new anti-terrorism measures including warrantless
surveillance and greater powers to cancel passports. Key also says
100 military trainers could be sent to Iraq.
December
9: Anti-terror
law changes passed under urgency, with some amendments after
widespread protest from Opposition parties, experts and NGOs.
2015
January
25: PM
John Key tells BBC that NZ's likely military contribution to the
fight against Islamic State "is the price of the club" that
NZ belongs to with the US, Australia, Britain and Canada.
February
4: During
a visit to NZ, British foreign secretary Philip Hammond says NZ is
regarded as family and he hopes it will become actively involved in
the fight against the Islamic State.
February
10: Defence
Minister Gerry Brownlee gives the Defence Force the go-ahead to begin
training for likely deployment to Iraq.
February
13: Iraqi
foreign minister Ibrahim al-Ja'afari travels to New Zealand to ask
for international support in the fight against the Islamic State.
February
24: PM
John Key confirms deployment of military trainers to Iraq.
Oceania won’t be at war with Eurasian Barbarians – John Key’s doublespeak
Martyn Bradbury
25
February, 2015
The
first rule of 5 eyes club is that there is no conflict while always
being in conflict. Key’s claim that we won’t really be going to
war is the kind of Orwellian doublespeak Tobacco companies use when
singing the praises of personal choice.
According
to the Prime Minister, we are going to war against a 14th century
Carthaginian colony? I was sure Barbarians were as rare as Vikings
The
PM’s repeated use of ‘Barbarians’ to describe the enemy he
wants to fight seems a tad ‘crusade’ for my liking. Are we
attacking the Goths and Vandals next?
Re-invading
Iraq makes as much strategic sense as re-invading Vietnam. If we want
to stop ISIS, we need to cut the funding of ISIS and the militia
fermenting the rise of ISIS from Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar, Kuwait,
& Iran – war isn’t the answer.
We
can’t compete with regional powers who are supporting sock puppet
militants for their own interests, but we can crack down on their
funders
Maybe
we wouldn’t have to go to re-invade Iraq if America hadn’t
invaded it for weapons of mass destruction that never existed.
How
is it that we find ourselves on the side of repressive regimes in a
war that is supposed to stop an oppressive regime? Syria has tortured
to death hundreds of thousands of their own citizens. Iraq helped
ferment the rise of ISIS with their vicious crack down on Sunni and
how many public beheadings does Saudi Arabia need to commit before
they meet John Key’s invasion threshold for ‘barbarian’?
Key
says that “We are not dancing to somebody else’s tune,” by
reinvading Iraq which is true only because Key has signed us up as a
member of the band playing bass & targeting drone strikes. Key
has sold out our sovereignty by declaring war for brownie points with
America, it’s as sad and venal as that.
Telling
NZers that our troops will be behind the wire isn’t much security
when soldiers are constantly being killed behind the wire.
We
are a nation of peace, and should always restrict violence as the
last resort, getting involved with the kind of allies this conflict
forces us to side with removes any moral high ground here, we are on
the side of butchers and feral dictators to fight a medieval
obscenity caused by those very same butchers and feral dictators.
EXCLUSIVE: NZ TROOPS
ALREADY IN IRAQ - JON
STEPHENSON
Freelance kiwi war journalist Jon Stephenson claims NZ SAS troops are already in Iraq and explains what John Key means when he says "and other activities you wouldn’t call war" and "intelligence for airstrikes".
Stephenson reckons NZ will be involved in a very bloody long term war.
For some historical background for those less familiar with our PM this is what Key said (In opposition) about going to Iraq in 2003
And was caught out (not for the first or last time) lying by the then Labour government
Previous prime minsters have been farmers and outsiders, but this one (new Zealand's first Jewish PM) is straight out of Wall Street.
Here, he features in a documentary from the mid - 80's on Forex traders
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.