Georgia judge dismisses Sidney Powell's Kraken law suit out of hand

After listening to this (and especially Trump) I am more and more dubious about narratives about martial law and the like. It seems to me that Trump huffs and puffs but is already setting his sights on 2024.

I am working on a project relating to China that is taking my attention. Unless I get some immediate energy and inspiration it may take some time as I am slower now.

I want to give some thought and present my thoughts about China because they have changed in the last 12 months.

JUDGE DISMISSES KRAKEN LAWSUIT WITHOUT LOOKING AT EVIDENCE

Today on TruNews, we discuss the dismissal of Sidney Powell’s election fraud suit in Georgia and the President’s endorsement of the upcoming Senate runoff being run on the same system alleged to be responsible for the steal. 

We also detail the allegations of treason being leveled against Governor Kemp and Secretary of State Raffensperger, including a taxpayer funded website in Chinese, and we address the possibility of foul play in the death of Senator Loeffler’s aide Harrison Deal. 

Doc Burkhart, Edward Szall, Matt Skow. Airdate 12/7/2020

Watch the broadcast HERE

Sidney Powell To Appeal 

Dismissal Of Georgia Lawsuit

Authored by Ivan Pentchoukov via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The legal team led by former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell will appeal the dismissal of the election lawsuit tossed by a federal judge on Monday.

Powell told The Epoch Times in an email that they “will proceed as fast as possible to the Supreme Court.”

U.S. District Court Judge Timothy Batten dismissed Powell’s lawsuit on Dec. 7, opining that the plaintiffs have no standing to sue, should have brought the lawsuit to a state court, and had filed the case too late.

“There’s no question that Georgia has a statute that explicitly directs that elections contests be filed in Georgia Superior Court,” Batten, an appointee of President George Bush, said in explaining his decision following an hour of oral arguments in court on Monday. “They are state elections. State courts should evaluate these proceedings from start to finish.”

Batten signaled his skepticism about the lawsuit at the opening of the hearing, choosing some of the talking points emphasized by the defendants to introduce the case.

Powell filed the lawsuit on Nov. 25 on behalf of the presidential electors for President Donald Trump. One of the core allegations of the lawsuit concerns election machines and software by Dominion Voting Systems. The lawsuit cited several affiants to claim that the Dominion machines were manipulated to illegally alter the outcome of the Nov. 3 election.

“Their primary complaint involves the Dominion ballot marking devices. They say that those machines are susceptible to fraud. There’s no reason they could not have followed the administrative procedure act to object to the rulemaking authority that had been exercised by the secretary of state. This suit could have been filed months ago when the machines were adopted,” Batten said.

Plaintiffs asked the court to decertify the results of the election, a remedy the judge deemed extraordinary.

Powell also alleged the existence of several other categories of potentially illegal votes, each sufficient to dispute the outcome of the election. She disagreed with the argument that the plaintiffs do not have standing or brought the suit too late.

“For those reasons we request the court to deny the motion to dismiss, allow us a few days, perhaps even just five, to conduct an examination of the machines that we have requested from the beginning and find out exactly what went on and give the court further evidence it might want to rule in our favor because the fraud that has happened here has destroyed any public confidence that the will of the people is reflected in their vote and just simply cannot stand,” Powell said in closing her argument.