Posts
I
have spent all morning, in vain to record a recording from the Hal
Turner show.
As usual, I lost all my functionality, all ability to
record so I am posting this and will add the commentary from Hal
Turner later.
Turner has to be treated with some caution but for all his
biases I would still regard as more reliable than the Deep State/CIA
media.
Who you believe - your decision,
President Trump in July asked the president of Ukraine to “do us a favor” by looking into an American cybersecurity firm, CrowdStrike, and the location of a Democratic National Committee server that Mr. Trump said was believed to be in Ukraine’s possession.
President Trump in July asked the president of Ukraine to “do us a favor” by looking into an American cybersecurity firm, CrowdStrike, and the location of a Democratic National Committee server that Mr. Trump said was believed to be in Ukraine’s possession.
“I
would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation
with Ukraine, they say CrowdStrike … I guess you have one of your
wealthy people … The server, they say Ukraine has it,” Mr. Trump
said during a phone call with the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr
Zelensky, on July 25, according to a reconstruction
of the call based
on notes and voice recognition transcription software.
Administration officials said the ellipses in the transcript represent words that trailed off or were inaudible.
Administration officials said the ellipses in the transcript represent words that trailed off or were inaudible.
The
White House released
the reconstructed transcript on
Wednesday, a day after House Democrats announced plans to start an
impeachment inquiry against the president over his efforts to
pressure Ukraine to pursue an investigation of one of his political
rivals, former Vice
President Joseph R. Biden Jr.
Mr.
Trump has long been focused on the whereabouts
of the elusive server that
CrowdStrike analysts examined in June 2016 and determined was
breached by two Russian hacker groups.
“Why
did the DNC REFUSE to turn over its Server to the FBI, and still
hasn’t? It’s all a big Dem scam and excuse for losing the
election!” Mr. Trump wrote
on Twitter in
June 2017....[ ]
"I
Am With Mueller": Newly Released Rosenstein Emails Reveal
Crusade To Investigate Trump
4 October, 2019
"I am with Mueller. He shares my views. Duty Calls. Sometimes the moment chooses us." -Rod Rosenstein, one day before Mueller was appointed as special counsel
New
emails obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
lawsuit reveal
the details surrounding communications between Deputy Attorney
General Rod Rosenstein and Robert Mueller in the days leading up to
the former FBI Director's appointment as special counsel in the
Russia probe. Mueller would go on to assemble a team comprising "13
Angry Democrats" as Trump called them, due to their obvious
animus towards the president.
According
to the 145
pages of documents obtained by Judicial
Watch, Rosenstein
and Mueller were discussing just three days after President Trump
fired former FBI Director James Comey,
and ostenisbly for some time before that.
"The
boss and his staff do not know about our discussions,"
Rosenstein wrote Mueller on May 12, 2017 as the two tried to nail
down a time for their next conversation.
Four
days later on May 16- the day before Mueller's
appointment, Rosenstein
told former Bush administration Deputy Attorney General and current
Kirkland & Ellis Partne, Mark Filip "I
am with Mueller. He shares my views. Duty Calls. Sometimes the
moment chooses us."
And on May 17 Rosenstein appointed former FBI Director Robert Mueller to investigate Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.
Also, during the same time period, between May 8 and May 17, Rosenstein met with then-acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe and other senior Justice Department FBI officials to discuss wearing a wire and invoking the 25th Amendment to remove President Trump. -Judicial Watch
Meanwhile, Rosenstein
was in contact with 60
Minutes, The New York Times and the Washington
Post during
the same time period.
"In an
email exchange dated May 2017, Rosenstein
communicated with New
York Times reporter
Rebecca Ruiz to provide background for this
article about himself.
Ruiz emailed Rosenstein a draft of the article, and he responded with
off-the-record comments and clarifications," according to
Judicial Watch.
-
In an email exchange on May 17, 2017, the day of Mueller’s appointment, Rosenstein exchanged emails with 60 Minutes producer Katherine Davis in which he answered off-the-record questions about Mueller’s scope of authority and chain of command:
Rosenstein: “Off the record: This special counsel is a DOJ employee. His status is similar to a US Attorney.”
Davis: “Good call on Mueller. Although I obviously thought you’d be great at leading the investigation too.”
-
On May 17, 2017, in an email exchange with Washington Post journalist Sari Horwitz and the subject line “Special Counsel” Rosenstein and Horwitz exchanged:
Rosenstein: “At some point, I owe you a long story. But this is not the right time for me to talk to anybody.”
Horwitz: “Now, I see why you couldn’t talk today! Obviously, we’re writing a big story about this. Is there any chance I could talk to you on background about your decision?” -JW
"These
astonishing emails further confirm the corruption behind Rosenstein’s
appointment of Robert Mueller," said Judicial Watch President
Tom Fitton. "The emails also show a shockingly cozy relationship
between Mr. Rosenstein and anti-Trump media reporters."
4
October, 2019
After
a week of non-stop "bombshell" leaks about the Democrats'
impeachment probe into President Trump, which is supposedly trying to
determine whether Trump pressured the newly elected Ukrainian
President to push for investigations into Joe and Hunter Biden and
their ties to a domestic gas company, the media is now being forced
to confront another uncomfortable reality:
That
Ukrainian prosecutors appear to be finally moving ahead with a review
of an investigation into a Biden-linked gas company, even
after the alleged "quid pro quo" had been taken off the
table.
Barely
12 hours after
President Trump "recommended" that Ukraine and China start
looking into the Bidens, WSJ reports
that Ukraine’s general prosecutor’s office is reviewing
investigations into a gas company that once paid Hunter Biden $50,000
a month to sit on its board.
Though
Democrats have continued to insist that it's Trump, not Biden, who is
truly guilty of corruption, the vice president doesn't sound too
comfortable with all of this new scrutiny. During an appearance in
Nevada last night, Biden
insisted that Trump won't "destroy me" or "my family,"
and accused the president of using "dirty tricks".
If
prosecutors decide to reopen the probe, that would be the clearest
sign yet that the Bidens might get caught up in an investigation -
vindicating President Trump's efforts.
The
investigations, which were closed in 2016, weren't focused on Hunter
Biden specifically.
Instead,
investigators were looking into "tax irregularities" at
Burisma Group, the private gas company in Ukraine that had hired
Hunter to sit on its board.
Investigators
were also reportedly looking into allegations of money-laundering and
illegal-enrichment tied to the company's owner, Mykola Zlochevsky.
Zlochevsky
was never charged in the investigation, and his lawyer said at the
time that the cases were closed due to lack of evidence, and that
Zlochevsky was cleared of wrongdoing.
Of
course, these conclusions are now being reexamined, even after
Zelensky affirmed during a joint press conference that he wouldn't
pursue investigations simply because that's what President Trump
wanted.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.