This is the view of a zionist, neo-conservative writer at the Washington Post.
Lebanon was last in Gen. Wesley Clark's list of countries for regime change
Syria is lost. Let’s save Lebanon.
Columnist
Oct. 17, 2019 at 5:46 a.m. GMT+13
Washington Post,
17 October, 2019
BEIRUT
— The aftershocks of President Trump’s abandonment of the Kurds
in Syria are rumbling through the region, and a string of Lebanese
officials told me last week that they fear they’re the next to be
discarded by the United States.
Lebanese
politicians and security officials, in a series of off-the-record
conversations, expressed concern about Trump’s acquiescence to
Turkey’s invasion of Syria, and the seeming eclipse of U.S. power.
“I feel sorry for America,” one prominent member of parliament
told me. “We feel pity,” said a senior security official. “This
America is not the America we used to know.”
“The
Iran-Syria-Russia axis has won,” said a top Lebanese politician.
“Syria will be united again” as the regime makes a deal with the
weakened Kurdish militia there, the senior security official said. He
explained that, for Iran, this Syria denouement is ideal: “Who
could offer them a situation better than that?Lebanese anxiety about
U.S. reversals in Syria is largely a matter of self-interest. Lebanon
survives by maintaining a balance between East and West, Iran and
Saudi Arabia, Sunnis and Shiites, Christians and Muslims. What has
helped keep this precarious structure alive for decades was the
belief that the United States, in the end, wouldn’t let the country
be dominated entirely by enemies of the West.
But
any remaining faith in U.S. power was jolted last week. Hasan
Nasrallah, the leader of Hezbollah, gloated
Here’s
a suggestion for a Trump administration that needs to reassert its
interests in the Middle East: Double down on Lebanon, a country where
the United States already provides significant economic and military
support. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who says he wants a stronger
Lebanon, should condition this additional aid on specific economic
reforms that can stem the corruption that’s almost as serious a
threat as Hezbollah.
Some
administration officials argue that Beirut is already a lost cause:
Hezbollah is the dominant political force here, so let Iran worry
about a collapsing Lebanon, they contend. But that argument is wrong,
especially now. The last thing the Middle East needs is another
failed state, especially one on Israel’s border. A stronger
Lebanese state would hurt Hezbollah rather than help it.
The
United States is already providing about $200 million annually in
equipment and training for the Lebanese military and security forces,
U.S. officials say. And it’s the largest aid donor for the
estimated 1.3 million Syrian war refugees here.
The
United States should encourage Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates
and other regional powers that oppose Iran to put more money into
Lebanon, too. But the United States needs to convince the Gulf states
that their money won’t just disappear down the drain of Lebanese
corruption.
What
would a stronger Lebanese state look like? First, it would be better
able to assert its sovereignty, starting with borders. To that end,
the United States should push to resume back-channel negotiations to
define a land and maritime border
In
return for deepening its support, the United States should demand
some urgent reforms. Lebanon needs a modern telecommunications
regulatory authority, as a first step toward privatization of the
largely state-owned telecommunications sector that could raise $6
billion. It needs to privatize its inept state-run electricity
company
Lebanon’s
sectarian political system now divvies up the spoils in these two key
sectors, along with about 100 other small state-owned enterprises.
Hezbollah probably gets the largest share, but all the other sects
and factions take their cuts. It’s a rotten system, and it’s long
past time for change.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.