when I received news of this shooting I was in a state of shock.
However, a night's sleep has given me the possibility for some
Initial comments on what doesn't make sense in the reporting of the Christchurch shooting
I am in no position to say what actually happened and am not going down the "false flag route", but just listening to the reporting on the Christchurch shooting yesterday and several things that don't make much sense.
The shooter warned of his intentions on social media
This is something that hit me in the eye when, first, I heard Roman Kosarev on RT say that the alleged shooter had warned of his actions 3 days before the shooting.
Then listening to TVNZ coverage there was an interview with a Muslim lady who reiterated the claim but also said the police were given this information.
"In this regard, Hal Turner is able to report on things that others are afraid of:
"He also stated on Social Media that he was going to do this, telling people on one site:
Well lads, it's time to stop shitposting and time to make a real life effort post.
I will carry out and attack against the invaders, and will even live stream the attack via facebook.
The facebook link is below, by the time you read this I should be going live.
It's been a long ride and despite all your rampant faggotry, fecklessness and degeneracy, you are all top blokes and the best bunch of cobbers a man could ask for.
I have provided links to my my writings below, please do your part by spreading my message, making memes and shitposting as you usually do."
The Screen Capture of that social media posting appears in its entirety, below . . . with replies from his online pals:
(Click image to enlarge in new window, then click it a SECOND TIME to make huge)
More from Hal Turner...
Most of the links mentioned by the shooter in his posting above, have been purged by Social Media Companies, but we got the writings he mentioned before the media companies cleaned them off the net!
In his writings, the shooter:
- Identified himself as a fascist and ethno-nationalist
- Says he supports Trump as a symbol of renewed white identity, but not as a policy maker or leader
- Was inspired by Anders Breivik
- Says he blames capitalists and immigrants
He says a lot more, like this:
Why did you carry out the attack?
- To most of all show the invaders that our lands will never be their lands, our homelands are our own and that, as long as a white man still lives, they will NEVER conquer our lands and they will never replace our people.
- To take revenge on the invaders for the hundreds of thousands of deaths caused by foreign invaders in European lands throughout history.
- To take revenge for the enslavement of millions of Europeans taken from their lands by the Islamic slavers.
- To take revenge for the thousands of European lives lost to terror attacks throughout European lands.
- To take revenge for Ebba Akerlund.
- To directly reduce immigration rates to European lands by intimidating and physically removing the invaders themselves.
- To agitate the political enemies of my people into action, to cause them to overextend their own hand and experience the eventual and inevitable backlash as a result.
- To incite violence, retaliation and further divide between the European people and the invaders currently occupying European soil.
- To avenge those European men and women lost in the constant and never ending wars of European history who died for their lands, died for their people only to have their lands given away to any foreign scum that bother to show up.
- To agitate the political enemies of my people into action, to over extend their own hand and experience the eventual backlash.
- To show the effect of direct action, lighting a path forward for those that wish to follow.A path for those that wish to free their ancestors lands from the invaders grasp and to be a beacon for those that wish to create a lasting culture, to tell them they are not alone.
- To create an atmosphere of fear and change in which drastic,powerful and revolutionary action can occur.
- To add momentum to the pendulum swings of history, further destabilizing and polarizing Western society in order to eventually destroy the current nihilistic, hedonistic, individualistic insanity that has taken control of Western thought.
- To drive a wedge between the nations of NATO that are European and the Turks that also make a part of the NATO forces, thereby turning NATO once more into a united European army and pushing the Turkey once more back to the true position of a foreign, enemy force.
- Finally, to create conflict between the two ideologies within the United States on the ownership of firearms in order to further the social, cultural, political and racial divide within the United states.This conflict over the 2nd amendment and the attempted removal of firearms rights will ultimately result in a civil war that will eventually balkanize the US along political, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines.
- This balkanization of the US will not only result in the racial separation of the people within the United States ensuring the future of the White race on the North American continent, but also ensuring the death of the “melting pot” pipe dream.
- Furthermore this balkanization will also reduce the USA’s ability to project power globally, and thereby ensure that never again can such a situation as the US involvement in Kosovo ever occur again(where US/NATO forces fought beside muslims and slaughtered Christian Europeans attempting to remove these Islamic occupiers from Europe).
What is wrong with the "livestream" video?
I have decided not to share the video online after the specific warnings by police. However if you want to see it it is available HERE
The official position is that the footage is too shocking to be seen by the public:
Police are aware there is extremely distressing footage relating to the incident in Christchurch circulating online.
When I saw the video I must say I was slightly underwhelmed and my impressions have been echoed by a few others. More than one person has said it looks more like a video game than anything else.
It looks a bit odd to see a large empty space with people lying together in the corner apparently dead.
The strangest thing is that there is NO or LITTLE blood.
I have never witnessed a shooting but I do know that a shooting with a handgun produces blood. A shooting with an automatic gun (as reported and shown in the video) will produce LOTS OF BLOOD.
There would seem to be so many high-velocity bullets coming out of the gun that had the video been what it purports to be seen we would have seen pools of blood.
Where are they?
In this next shot we can see some blood but is this what we would expect?
If what we are seeing is a cold-blooded killer entering the mosque why are we not seeing that reflected in the video. In such situations people tend to panic and to scream at the top of their lungs and beg to be spared.
Why can I not hear this in the video?
WHO IS GOING TO BE BLAMED?
I am not going to automatically go down the "false flag" route but I do want to point out those things in the mainstream narrative that don't make sense and which have things in common with just about all previous terrorist attacks and shootings.
Whatever the truth the media narrative is always to create an emotional reaction whereby previously (for example) people might have been against arming the police end up practically begging for it.
OTHER THINGS GOING ON IN NEW ZEALAND IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO THE ATTACK
The article doesn't say it but Hillary Clinton's operative, John Podesta was in Christchurch a few days ago saying NZ was a "juicy target" for a major (Russian) hack. What else was he up to?
The victim of the world's most notorious political hack is warning New Zealand's election next year is at serious risk of a major cyber-attack by Russia and China.
In an exclusive television interview, Hillary Clinton's former presidential campaign manager, John Podesta, told Newshub that New Zealand is a big juicy target - and that hacked information could be weaponised as fake news.
My guess is that after this people will be begging for armed police and other means of removing civil liberties.
All frontline police are now carrying guns in Christchurch after a shootout on Tuesday.
A 33-year-old man remains in hospital in a serious but stable condition after being shot by police in a Richmond firefight.
Canterbury District Commander John Price says all frontline officers will be carrying firearms until further notice….
Price says it wasn't a decision they made lightly, but it's necessary for the safety of both police and the public.
This may be an indication of the sort of witchhunt that may be coming.
The thoughtful piece by Vinny Eastwood has already removed for "harassment"and "bullying"
Who, one has to ask was being "bullied"?
In lieu of that there is this: