US
Atomic Plants ‘Dodging Radioactive Bullets’ as Floodwaters
Submerge Midwest
24
March, 2019
With
heavy rainfall inundating the US Midwest, nuclear power plants risk
being flooded. However, the plants continue to operate at full power,
resulting in the potential for “unnecessary, extremely high risk”
accidents, according to Kevin Kamps, the Radioactive Waste Watchdog
at the organization Beyond Nuclear.
"In
Nebraska alone, you've got the Offutt Air Force Base, which is the
home of the [US] Strategic Command, which controls the nuclear
arsenal of the US, and it's largely flooded," Kamps told Radio
Sputnik's Loud & Clear hosts Brian Becker and Nicole Roussell.
According
to Offutt Tech. Sgt. Rachelle Blake, around 60 buildings on the south
end of the base, including the 55th Wing headquarters and two
aircraft maintenance hangars, were flooded over the weekend by as
much as eight feet of water. The 55th Wing is a US Air Force unit
assigned to Air Combat Command.
"You've
also got two nuclear power plants in Nebraska. You've got Fort
Calhoun, north of Omaha on the Missouri [River], which thankfully
shut down in 2016. And the reason it shut down was the previous
historic floods on the Missouri in 2011 damaged the Fort Calhoun
nuclear power plant, [so] that it never recovered. But you've also
got the Cooper atomic reactor south of Omaha on the Missouri River,
and yet again, for the second time, in 2011 and [now in] 2019, Cooper
— which is being run by Entergy Nuclear of New Orleans on behalf of
a public utility in Nebraska — ran at 100 percent power levels
through these historic floods. For the industry, that's the bragging
point: ‘Look at what we can do,'" Kamps noted.
"It's
a Fukushima-like situation, where you're dealing with a natural
disaster and insisting upon operating at 100 percent power levels
with your atomic reactor. Granted, Japan didn't know that natural
disaster was coming. And so, the danger is, if you lose power from
the grid, and then your emergency diesel backup generators fail, you
can't control the cooling on those hellishly hot atomic reactor
cores," Kamps explained.
"In
addition to the reactor risks, there are radioactive risks, which are
still present at the shut-down Fort Calhoun but also at Cooper, both
in the storage pools, which can go up in flames, but also in the dry
casks that could be impacted by the floods. They [Omaha Public Power
District, Entergy Nuclear] might have dodged a bullet again in 2019,
but they keep taking these unnecessary, extremely high risks with
their operations," he added.
In
March 2011, the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant in Japan's Ōkuma,
Fukushima prefecture, was hit by a 46-foot tsunami triggered by a
9.0-magnitude offshore earthquake. The natural disaster crippled the
facility's cooling system and resulted in the leakage of radioactive
materials, hydrogen-air explosions and eventually the plant's
shutdown, Sputnik previously reported.
On
Monday, the Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD) announced that the
Cooper Nuclear Plant was continuing to operate safely.
"We
are operating at full power, and the water is receding… and we
expect the water level to continue dropping," NPPD spokesman
Mark Becker said, according to Reuters. In addition, he noted that
the plant was 899.75 feet above sea level Monday morning, below the
901.5 feet that would require the nuclear reactor to shut down.
"Back
in 2011… there are about a half dozen major dams upstream of Fort
Calhoun on the Missouri River, any one of which failing could have
have created a domino effect of failures with the other dams, and it
could have sent a very deep wall of water coming down the Missouri
River. And the Fort Calhoun power plant could have been inundated
under very deep water," Kamps explained.
"It
happened at Fukushima. All of a sudden, an hour after that earthquake
in Japan, that wall of water — 45 feet deep — hit the nuclear
plant and hit the last remaining power sources, which were the
emergency diesel generators. So, here in Nebraska, there is renewed
potential for those upstream major upstream dams to fail, [to] send a
wall of water down. Another danger at both Fort Calhoun, with the
stored waste, but also at Cooper with the operating reactor and the
stored waste: if local levees were to fail and allow flood waters to
inundate the sites even deeper," Kamps noted.
"At
Fort Calhoun, just now, they came within one foot, nine inches of
having to shut down under their own very loose and weak protocols.
That's how close it came. So, it's incredible the risks that they
[NPPD, Entergy] take. If they had any responsibility, they would shut
down."
According
to Becker, the US Army Corps of Engineers has reduced water releases
from the Gavins Point Dam to decrease the risk of flooding downriver.
"And
to give some credit, Fort Calhoun in 2011 did shut down months ahead
of time — in April — because they saw what was coming with the
snow melts; they had enough predictions. They [NPPD] shut down months
ahead of time, and even though they did, they were so damaged by the
floods, and they still screwed up and had a fire burning within the
turbine building that nobody dealt with. That final straw of the fire
not being dealt with days on end, that's what led to the final
shutdown several years later. Dodging radioactive bullets is not fun
stuff, but it's kind of what they do for a living," Kamps noted.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.