White House seeks revisions to Dems' FISA rebuttal memo, halting release
26
November, 2014
The
White House on Friday told Democrats on the House Intelligence
Committee to redraft their rebuttal to a controversial GOP memo
alleging government surveillance abuse during the 2016 campaign,
saying sensitive details need to be stripped out before the document
can be made public.
The
message was sent to the committee on Friday in a letter from White
House Counsel Don McGahn.
"Although
the president is inclined to declassify the February 5th Memorandum,
because the Memorandum contains numerous properly classified and
especially sensitive passages, he is unable to do so at this time,"
McGahn wrote.
"However,
given the public interest in transparency in these unprecedented
circumstances, the President has directed that Justice Department
personnel be available to give technical assistance to the Committee,
should the Committee wish to revise the February 5th Memorandum to
mitigate the risks identified by the Department," McGahn
continued. "The President encourages the Committee to undertake
these efforts. The Executive Branch stands ready to review any
subsequent draft of the February 5th Memorandum for declassification
at the earliest opportunity."
A
letter signed by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and FBI
Director Christopher Wray accompanied McGahn's response. In that
accompanying letter, the two men noted "a version of the
document that identifies, in highlighted text, information the
release of which would present such concerns in light of longstanding
principles regarding the protection of intelligence sources and
methods, ongoing investigations, and other similarly sensitive
information.
"We
have further identified, in red boxes, the subset of such information
for which national security or law enforcement concerns are
especially significant. Our determinations have taken into account
the information previously declassified by the President as
communicated in a letter to HPSCI Chairman Devin Nunes dated February
2, 2018."
Earlier
this week, the House Intelligence Committee approved the release of
the Democrats' memo, giving Trump five days to consider whether he
should block publication for national security reasons.
For
the moment, the White House letter halts the release.
“The
President’s double standard when it comes to transparency is
appalling," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said
in a statement after the release of McGahn's letter. "The
rationale for releasing the Nunes memo, transparency, vanishes when
it could show information that’s harmful to him. Millions of
Americans are asking one simple question: What is he hiding?”
Democrats
have been expected to use their memo to try to undermine Republican
claims that the FBI and DOJ relied heavily on the anti-Trump dossier
to get a warrant to spy on a Trump associate -- and omitted key
information about the document's political funding. Democrats claim
the GOP memo was misleading.
"We
think this will help inform the public of the many distortions and
inaccuracies in the majority memo," California Rep. Adam Schiff,
the top Democrat on the panel, said Monday.
But
it had been expected that the Democrats' memo might raise red flags
during the review period.
A
source who read the FISA rebuttal memo told Fox News earlier this
week that it is filled with sources and methods taken from the
original documents. The source argued that this was done to
strategically force the White House to either deny release of the
memo or substantially redact it, so that Democrats could accuse the
White House of making redactions for political reasons.
INTELLIGENCE
COMMITTEE APPROVES RELEASE OF DEMS’ REBUTTAL TO FISA MEMO
South
Carolina Rep. Trey Gowdy, a GOP member of the committee, said during
an interview this week on Fox News’ “The Story with Martha
MacCallum” that Democrats “are politically smart enough to put
things in the memo” that have to be redacted.
“Therefore,
it creates this belief that there's something being hidden from the
American people,” Gowdy said.
Last
Friday, Republicans on the intelligence committee released their
much-anticipated memo from Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif.
It
also said the FBI and DOJ “ignored or concealed” dossier author
Christopher Steele’s “anti-Trump financial and ideological
motivations" when asking the secret Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Court for permission to eavesdrop on former Trump
adviser Carter Page.
Democrats
have been pushing back against those claims and accusing Republicans
of exaggerations.
CRIMINAL
REFERRAL BACKS UP NUNES ON DOSSIER CLAIMS, AS DEMS PUSH REBUTTAL MEMO
Earlier
this week, a newly released version of a letter from Senate Judiciary
Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Sen. Lindsey Graham,
R-S.C., appeared to support key claims from the GOP memo.
The
surveillance applications, they said in a criminal referral for
Steele sent in early January to FBI Director Christopher Wray and
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, “relied heavily on Mr.
Steele’s dossier claims.”
Further,
they said the application “failed to disclose” funding from the
Clinton campaign and DNC.
The
referral also helped explain a point of contention in recent days,
after Nunes seemed to admit on “Fox & Friends” that the FBI
application did include a “footnote” acknowledging some political
origins of the dossier. This admission helped fuel Democratic claims
that the dossier’s political connection was not concealed from the
surveillance court as alleged.
According
to Grassley and Graham’s referral, the FBI “noted to a vaguely
limited extent the political origins of the dossier” in a footnote
that said the information was compiled at the direction of a law firm
“who had hired an ‘identified U.S. person’ – now known as
Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS.” A subsequent passage in the letter is
redacted. But they said the DNC and Clinton campaign were not
mentioned.
Republicans
have seized on the Nunes document to make the accusation of
widespread anti-Trump bias at the top of the FBI and DOJ that sparked
inquiries into Trump campaign relations with Russia during the
election.
The
president has repeatedly said there was “no collusion” between
his campaign and Russia. The White House responded to the Republican
memo last week by saying it “raises serious concerns about the
integrity of decisions made at the highest levels of the Department
of Justice and the FBI to use the government’s most intrusive
surveillance tools against American citizens.”
Fox
News’ Judson Berger and John Roberts contributed to this report.
Catherine
Herridge is an award-winning Chief Intelligence correspondent for FOX
News Channel (FNC) based in Washington, D.C. She covers intelligence,
the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security.
Herridge joined FNC in 1996 as a London-based correspondent.
H.A.Goodman
From Right Side Broadcasting
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.