Wednesday, 11 May 2016

PM John Key thrown out of parliament

NZ’s shonkey PM ejected from parliamentary debating chamber by his own partisan Speaker

 Key after being chucked out.

Look at the body language of his deputy dawg, Bill English.He doesn't look so comfortable.

Radio NZ

Prime Minister John Key has been ejected from the House for disobeying the Speaker, and after an exchange with Greens co-leader James Shaw over the Panama Papers.

The incident happened this afternoon, when the prime minister was answering a question from Mr Shaw on why he refused to apologise to charities Greenpeace, the Red Cross, and Amnesty for linking them to the Panama Papers.

While calling for order, the Speaker, David Carter, told Mr Key to "resume his seat".

When Mr Key didn't he was ordered to leave the chamber.

"I gave him fair warning, when I stand to my feet and call to order, he is to be treated no different to any other member of this House."

The Speaker ordered Mr Key to leave after he continued to shout, despite Mr Carter telling him to stop.

. is so provocatively reasonable the PM loses it and gets kicked out.

Yesterday Mr Key used Parliamentary privilege to claim that Amnesty, Greenpeace and the Red Cross had been implicated in the Panama Papers leak, and that Green MP Mojo Mathers had a foreign trust.

The charities named had been the victim of an earlier scam where fraudsters used their names as a front to hide their money in foreign trusts and were not named in the papers.

The last time a prime minister was asked to leave the house was Helen Clark in 2005

PM ejected from the House for disobeying Speaker, also means he's not hear to answer next question

Green Party MP Mojo Mathers says she is a beneficiary of a UK-based family trust - not a foreign trust.

Green Party MP Mojo Mathers says she is a beneficiary of a UK-based family trust - not a foreign trust.Green Party MP Mojo Mathers says she is a beneficiary of a UK-based family trust - not a foreign trust.

Greenpeace boss and former MP Russel Norman says John Key is using "discredited allegations" that Greenpeace gained from a foreign trust to score political points.

During Question Time on Tuesday the Prime Minister told Green Party co-leader James Shaw, who replaced Norman last year, that he should speak to Greenpeace about why they're implicated in the Panama Papers.

Key said there were "quite legitimate reasons why people have a foreign trust" and told Shaw to leave the House and "ring Greenpeace, Amnesty International and Red Cross because they are implicated in the papers".

John Key accuses Greenpeace and Green MP Mojo Mathers of benefiting from foreign trusts after being questioned by Green Party leader James Shaw about Mossack Fonseca.

But Norman says the reference is to old papers from 2013, which have already been "discredited" after it was revealed rich investors had been naming charities as trust beneficiaries to avoid scrutiny by tax authorities.

Panama Papers NZ - John Key was 'factually wrong' in comments he made on charities' links to foreign trusts, says Greenpeace NZ head Russel Norman.

Amnesty International executive director Grant Bayldon and Greenpeace executive director Russel Norman.
Amnesty International executive director Grant Bayldon and Greenpeace executive director Russel Norman.Amnesty International's Bayldon (left) and Russel Norman of Greenpeace, who says the PM's comments on trusts were wrong. Photo: SUPPLIED

During loud exchanges in Parliament yesterday, Mr Key said Greenpeace, Amnesty and the Red Cross featured in the Panama Papers.

The organisations are mentioned a searchable database released yesterday by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists.

The Panama Papers are an unprecedented leak of 11.5 million files from the database of Mossack Fonseca, the world's fourth-biggest offshore law firm.

Foreign trusts and New Zealand's rules have been under scrutiny since the release of the papers, which revealed how Mossack Fonseca orchestrated a worldwide web of companies to let people hide money and avoid taxes.

An investigation into the papers by RNZ, TVNZ and investigative journalist Nicky Hager has shown New Zealand is being used by foreigners to organise their private wealth, business affairs and channel their funds around the world.

Mr Key went on the front foot over the Panama Papers in Parliament yesterday, armed with the IRD's initial analysis of the documents, but Mr Norman said the Prime Minister "fell on his face".

"Because he was factually incorrect. He got it wrong, and I suggest the prime minister apologise."

Mr Norman said while Greenpeace was listed in the database that kept the Panama Papers information, it was part of a separate data set from another release of documents several years ago.

He said the mention of charities in that data release had been found to be a common scam, where people who were trying to avoid tax would use a charity to try and cover up their tracks.

The prime minister should have known more about the facts, said Mr Norman.

"When you're the prime minister of New Zealand and you have basically unlimited research capacity and then you look into this database and there are two data sets in there - one of them is the Panama Papers, another one is an entirely separate one - it seems to me that you are responsible for making sure the comments you make are accurate.

"What the prime minister said was not true, it was inaccurate. We are not in the Panama Papers. There may well be many instances where charities, for example, were basically being used by scammers, but all the prime minister is doing is revictimising the charities but saying that somehow, they are caught up in this corrupt thing, and they're not."

Mr Norman said the prime minister needed to stop flinging around blame and should actually address the issue of foreign trusts.

Amnesty International executive director Grant Bayldon said trusts were scams designed to trick people into thinking they are giving money to a real charity.

Mr Bayldon said it was a known fact that trusts listed charities as beneficiaries, so the real owners could avoid scrutiny by tax authorities, and charities were not aware when their names were used in this way.

He said Amnesty had no knowledge of any real links with foreign trusts and he was disappointed Mr Key would insinuate otherwise.

New Zealand Red Cross secretary general Tony Paine said the organisation wanted to stay out of the political debate.

"Questions of the prime minister's motivations probably need to be put to him," he said.

However, he backed up Mr Norman's comments that the data Mr Key had quoted was a scam where charities' names were used to avoid paying tax.

"Our message is simply that it is just something that people are going overseas to use our good name, our much-loved name and we want to assure people there is no link between either New Zealand Red Cross or International Red Cross and these trusts."

He said the Red Cross was one of the most recognised, most trusted, symbols in the world and it worked hard to keep it that way.

Labour deputy leader Grant Robertson said Mr Key's was trying to avoid facing legitimate questions about New Zealand's foreign trust regime.

"This is typical of the way the prime minister deals with issues like this. He's attempting to divert and diminish the issue," he said.

"It's not just Greenpeace and Amnesty and the Red Cross, the All Blacks have been used in the same way.

"It is a ridiculous thing for the prime minister, who I'm sure knew that this was part of a scam, to throw that into the debate," Mr Robertson said.

Mr Key's office said he was "simply making the point that just because someone is named on the database does not mean they have done anything wrong, and that people should be wary of drawing conclusions based on the data released."

*The investigation into New Zealand links in the Panama Papers is a journalistic collaboration by reporters from RNZ News, One News and investigative journalist Nicky Hager, and with the assistance of the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists and the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung

No comments:

Post a Comment