I
wonder if we will EVER see the consequences of a marine heatwave on
the ecology in our own neck of the woods reported in this country.
Anecdotal accounts abound.
'Unprecedented'
marine heatwave triggered huge carbon-dioxide release
SMH,
20
March, 2018
A
severe heatwave off north-western Western Australia hammered the
world's largest region of seagrass, triggering the release of as much
as nine million tonnes of carbon dioxide, a paper by international
researchers has found.
Two
months of temperatures 2-4 degrees above average in the summer of
2010-11 resulted in the loss of about 1000 square-kilometres of
seagrass in Shark Bay by 2014, or about a fifth of its extent,
according to the paper which was published on Tuesday in Nature
Climate Change.
It
was “an unprecedented increase of water temperatures over a long
period that resulted in a stress for the plants, and they died”,
Oscar Serrano, a researcher at Edith Cowan University and one of the
paper's lead authors, said.
Shark
Bay is a global hotspot for seagrass, accounting for about 2.4 per
cent of the world's total area, with 12 species. It is also an
important habitat for turtles and dugongs and many small fish
species.
The
value of seagrass is also that it is a so-called "blue carbon"
sink, along with mangroves, with an ability to trap carbon in amounts
that dwarf terrestrial counterparts.
“It
is much more effective to restore or conserve one hectare of seagrass
than Amazonian forest in terms of [carbon] mitigation potential –
30 to 50 times more," Dr Serrano told Fairfax Media.
Unfortunately,
when seagrass is dies, it has the potential to release huge amounts
of carbon-dioxide back to the atmosphere - potentially increasing the
likelihood of further heatwaves by fuelling global warming.
The
researchers - ranging from Australia, Spain, Malaysia, the United
States and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia - estimated the loss from the
heatwave event released as much as 9 million tonnes of CO2, or the
equivalent annual emissions of 800,000 homes or 1,600,000 cars.
The
estimates were based on modelling releases based in-situ studies from
50 sites.
Rob
Coles, a seagrass expert at the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral
Reef Studies at James Cook University, said all natural systems that
store carbon were "at some level fragile", noting the
recent bushfires in Victoria and NSW.
“If
you're relying on carbon storage in the marine world, then you also
need to need to think about the probability of that being mobilised
at some stage in the future, and how you might try to minimise that
risk,” Professor Coles said.
“You
need to realise these risks can accumulate very quickly if you’re
not careful - we could be in for a very different world.”
While
the Nature paper recommended supporting seed dispersal or debris
removal to help the seagrass recover, Professor Coles said the costs
would likely prove prohibitive.
Dr
Serrano said the seagrass species most affected inclined below-ground
biomass of Amphibolis and to a lesser extent Posidonia - the only
two species forming large continuous beds.
While
there had been "a bit of recovery", the process of full
recolonisation would take "decades or hundreds of years”, he
said.
“When
you lose the canopy of the seagrass, you lose this sequestration
capacity of the meadows, and it results in CO2 emissions from the
soil carbon," he said.
Professor
Coles said the seagrass in the Great Barrier Reef was of more
tropical species and had not suffered similar heat impacts as in
Shark Bay - although water quality and cyclones had taken their
tolls.
While tropical species might be faster growing, they typically store less carbon than the more temperate variety found off WA.
Researchers
say an unprecedented ocean heatwave responsible for wiping out a
range of species in WA waters seven years ago released huge amounts
of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere — equivalent to the yearly
output of two coal-fired power plants.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.