Here are two articles from the Guardian - from a time when they did real investigative journalism. It delves into the murky past of the chemical weapons laboratory at Porton Down, down the road where the Skripals were allegedly attacked with the nerve agent "Novichok"
The 2004 article was cited by Maria Zakharova on Russian TV.
Porton
Down links
· www.portonveterans.8m.com Porton Down veterans support group
·Chemical and Biological Defence at Porton Down 1916-2000, G B Carter, Stationery Office, £16.99
The 2004 article was cited by Maria Zakharova on Russian TV.
The
past Porton Down can't hide
As
an inquest reopens into the death of a young airman 51 years ago, Rob
Evans reveals the secrets of Britain's nerve gas tests
Rob
Evans
6
May, 2004
Tucked
away in 7,000 acres of beautiful Wiltshire countryside lies one of
Britain's most infamous scientific establishments. Porton Down,
founded in 1916, is the oldest chemical warfare research installation
in the world. The tight secrecy which has surrounded the
establishment for decades has fed the growth of all sorts of myths
and rumours about its experiments. One Whitehall official once
remarked that Porton had an image of "a sinister and nefarious
establishment".
The
Porton experiments on humans have attracted a good deal of criticism.
It is, for example, alleged that the human "guinea pigs' - drawn
from the armed forces and supposedly all volunteers - were duped into
taking part in the tests. There are still concerns that the tests
have damaged the long-term health of the human subjects.
This
week, its work has been thrown into the spotlight once again: an
inquest was reopened into the death, in May 1953, of a young airman,
Ronald Maddison. He died after liquid nerve gas was dripped on to his
arm by Porton scientists in an experiment. The original inquest
decided that his death was accidental, but this new inquest will
examine fresh evidence and decide if the verdict should stand.
But
what were the scientists at Porton doing? Years after the experiments
ended, did they achieve anything of scientific value? The Guardian
has pieced together a comprehensive and surprising picture of the
nerve gas experiments, drawn from reports of the tests uncovered at
the Public Record Office and new documents obtained under the "open
government" code.
From
a purely scientific point of view, they produced a huge amount of
data about the effects of nerve gas on the human body. This data in
turn has enabled Porton to develop some of the most sophisticated
defences in the world to protect Britain's armed forces from chemical
attack. Porton acknowledges that the human experiments have made a
"vital contribution" to this protection. The data also
helped Britain to develop its own arsenal of nerve gas before such
plans were finally shelved in the late 1960s.
From
1945 to 1989, Porton exposed more than 3,400 human "guinea pigs"
to nerve gas. It seems probable that Porton has tested more human
subjects with nerve gas, for the longest period of time, than any
other scientific establishment in the world. Two other nations have
admitted testing nerve gas on humans: the American military exposed
about 1,100 soldiers between 1945 and 1975, and Canada tested a small
number before 1968. Other countries, including France, the old Soviet
Union and Iraq, are also likely to have exposed humans to nerve gas,
but very little is known about their tests.
The
group of chemicals known as nerve gases were first developed as
weapons by the Nazis before and during the second world war. German
scientists discovered the potency of these organophosphorous
compounds which, in tiny quantities, disrupt a key element of the
nervous system.
Human
muscles contract when a chemical, acetylcholine, is released from the
nerve endings. Muscles do not exist in a permanent form of
contraction because acetylecholine is destroyed in a split second by
an enzyme (acetylcholinesterase), thus allowing the muscle to relax
again. Nerve gases inactivate this important enzyme, and since it is
prevented from working, the muscle goes into a state of spasm from
which it cannot be relaxed. Victims die because the most important
muscles in the body - those of the heart and the rib cage, which
control the emptying and filling of the lungs - are paralysed. They
suffocate swiftly in a horrifying death.
The
nerve gases are more deadly than any other chemical weapon, but
during the second world war, only the Germans had spotted their full
potential and produced an arsenal of the munitions. As one Porton
official has commented, the British and their allies were "caught
with our pants down".
As
the Third Reich was collapsing in April 1945, the British discovered
stocks of the gas in Germany. Within two weeks, Porton had tested the
new gas on batches of human subjects, even though they did not know
what the unknown compound was or how it harmed the body.
The
discovery of the new weapons instantly transformed Porton, as all its
previous work on other chemicals, such as mustard gas, was
downgraded. Porton scientists quickly had to find out how nerve gases
attacked the human body.
One
of the early tests established just how little one of the nerve
gases, sarin, was needed to trigger a reaction in humans. Fifty-six
men were sent into gas chambers and exposed to "low
concentrations" of gas. The scientists watching recorded that
after 20 minutes, the men started to suffer miosis (constriction of
the pupil), one of the first symptoms of nerve gas poisoning. Their
vision was blurred and darkened, in some cases for up to five days.
Fourteen
men were exposed to repeated doses of sarin, some when they were
still experiencing the effects of the previous poisoning. Porton
scientists observed: "Repeated exposures produced, after the
third or fourth occasion, an aggravation of effects ..."
By
1950, Porton had begun to test "considerable higher doses"
of sarin on 133 men, and catalogued the severity of symptoms, such as
runny noses, headaches, vomiting and eye pain.
Within
two years, Porton had moved on to look at other aspects. In one
study, in 1952, it wanted to see how sarin would impair the mental
performance and intellectual ability of humans.
Twenty
airmen were exposed to sarin and then measured to see how they
performed in intelligence and aptitude tests. From this experiment,
Porton inferred that after exposure, the men's visual co-ordination
was worse, but their reasoning and intellectual capability had not
deteriorated. Another 12 men were exposed to stronger doses of sarin
- Porton found that the men appeared "behaviourally much less
disturbed than the increased concentration (of sarin) would lead one
to expect".
Maddison
died during what is probably Porton's most controversial experiment.
It will be at the heart of the inquest over the coming weeks. He was
one of 396 men who took part in a large experiment whose aim was to
"determine the dosage of [three nerve gases] which when applied
to the clothed or bare skin of men would cause incapacitation or
death".
The
scientists were aiming to expose the men to sub-lethal quantities of
the nerve gases and then measure how much each of the quantities was
reducing the amount of cholinesterase enzymes in the body. They were
trying to establish a ratio between the two figures and then
extrapolate them to arrive at the lethal dose for humans. But they
discovered that this theory was flawed, as there is no direct
correlation.
After
Maddison's death, Porton was limited in the amount of nerve gas it
could test on humans, but the trials continued.
About
300 soldiers in the mid-1950s were used to see how well they could
conduct military operations after they had been attacked with nerve
gas. They were gassed with relatively low levels and then sent on a
mock exercise. The men performed well in daylight, but less so at
night. The biggest hindrance was that they could not see very well,
but the scientists believed that a "determined infantryman"
could still fight on after being exposed to low amounts of nerve gas.
They
speculated that during the day, "a unit of intact morale"
could cope, but at night, the men would have been vulnerable because
they would have been prone to panic, especially since their sight was
being hampered.
The
psychological effects of nerve gas were a continuing focus of
experiments in the 1950s. In one set of trials, the men underwent a
series of intelligence and aptitude tests after being gassed. Porton
found that the men were distinctly unhappy and depressed afterwards,
emotions that were combined with a "feeling of reduced mental
alertness and a tendency to social withdrawal".
In
the late 1950s, Porton studied the effect of nerve gas on particular
parts of the body. One study concluded that nerve gas did not impair
hearing; this might have been a problem if troops could not, for
instance, hear instructions or orders in the heat of the battle after
a gas attack. Another looked at whether nerve gas hindered the
circulation of blood through the veins in the leg; it didn't. Another
examined the impact of nerve gas on the heart, as the scientists
wanted to see if particular muscles between the ribs were responsible
for one of the usual nerve gas symptoms - a "tightness in the
chest".
In
the later years of the programme, Porton seems to have focused on
assessing the effects of nerve gas on the eyes, a crucial question
because, for instance, pilots faced with reading complicated rows of
instruments could be put out of action with a slightest amount of
exposure to the gas.
The
nerve gas programme was substantial at Porton because human testing
has been an integral part of the establishment since it was founded.
During the past 80 years, some 25,000 humans have been subjected to
Porton's experiments, many in trials with other chemical weapons such
as mustard gas and tear gas. Others were used simply to test
defensive equipment without being exposed to chemicals.
Today,
Porton is devoted totally to devising defensive measures against gas
attacks. But the conduct and ethical standards of tests in the past
will be under unprecedented scrutiny in the inquest over the coming
weeks.
· www.portonveterans.8m.com Porton Down veterans support group
Books
·Chemical and Biological Defence at Porton Down 1916-2000, G B Carter, Stationery Office, £16.99
·Rob
Evans is the author of Gassed: British chemical warfare experiments
on humans at Porton Down (House of Stratus, 2000, £20)
Attack
on London
In
the 50s and 60s, British government scientists carried out secret
trials to find out the likely effects of a biological attack. The
results, some never published before, reveal how shockingly
vulnerable the capital is to an anthrax attack. Rob Evans
investigates
Rob
Evans
12
October, 2001
It
was lunchtime on London's Northern line. Deep underground, passengers
were getting on and off the tube trains as normal. Two men boarded a
train at Colliers Wood in south London. As the train gathered speed
towards its next stop, Tooting Broadway, one of them got up from his
seat and dropped a small carton of face powder out of the window. He
could have been idly throwing away litter.
As
the train sped on, the carton hit the tracks and burst. Out spewed
millions of tiny spores, which began to spread throughout the dark
tunnels. Dust swabs taken after three days and two weeks showed that
the spores had spread as far up the line as Camden Town station in
north London, 10 miles away.
This
really happened. But the two men weren't terrorists but government
scientists. And the spores weren't anthrax spores, but a harmless
micro-organism designed to mimic clandestine sabotage with anthrax.
This was an official experiment in 1963, and it showed how easily
saboteurs could inflict a potentially devastating attack on Britain's
capital.
If
there had been real anthrax in the carton, many thousands of
passengers would have started to inhale the spores, which would have
lain undiscovered for some time. The hardy spores can survive for
months. Once inhaled, the spores germinate, producing living anthrax
bacteria that multiply rapidly. But it can take up to two months for
symptoms to appear.
They
would then have suffered fever, headaches, chills, chest pains and
other symptoms. Some would have appeared to recover, but then almost
all would have died abruptly, after quickly developing lung and brain
damage and internal bleeding. London would have been gripped by chaos
and panic as ministers tried to find out what had happened.
Documents
obtained by the Guardian show how scientists secretly conducted a
series of trials in the 1950s and 1960s to assess how easily
saboteurs could spread deadly germs - and terror - among Britons.
Their conclusions make disturbing reading. The trials clearly
demonstrated that Britain was highly vulnerable to such a covert
strike. "The potential for clandestine biological warfare attack
is considerable," the scientists wrote. For many people, that
warning now carries more weight than ever; fears of bio-terrorism
have grown markedly since September 11, with Americans especially
jittery.
Yesterday,
the US government launched a criminal investigation into the outbreak
of anthrax in a newspaper office in Florida after it was detected in
a third person. The bacteria was found in the nose of an unnamed
35-year-old woman. The US attorney general, John Ashcroft, cautioned
that there was still no evidence that the cases were caused by
terrorists.
Britain
has secret contingency plans to cope with a deliberate release of
chemical or biological weapons in populated areas. But whatever the
preparations, it appears that there is little that the government
could do to prevent citizens being infected, or dying, if terrorists
do manage to strike with deadly germs.
A
document leaked this week to Channel 4 News spelt out that "although
the threat of such action is low, the consequences are potentially
enormous. It is likely that the number of casualties would far exceed
that resulting from any previous major incident in this country."
One
of the trials showed how anthrax could be used to rip the heart out
of the British government. Around 100ft underneath central London is
a huge network of tunnels. They are connected to war rooms and
"citadels" to where, in a crisis, ministers and mandarins
can retreat and continue running the country.
In
mock attacks on these tunnels in 1955, the scientists released
non-lethal organisms that simulated the behaviour of anthrax. The
first trial showed that the spores "readily penetrated"
huge doors leading up to the surface. The second resulted in "heavy
contamination" of three government departments, including the
building that is now the Treasury.
In
the next trial, the fake anthrax was sprayed along the section of
tunnels known as "Q Whitehall", which runs below major
government buildings from Parliament to Trafalgar Square. The
experiment revealed "extensive contamination of many Whitehall
buildings". Although the account of the trial is coy, it is
probable that the spores would have infiltrated the prime minister's
residence at 10 Downing Street.
Clearly,
such a strike could disrupt the upper echelons of the government,
wreaking havoc and triggering widespread confusion. Some of the
tunnels can be entered easily, but a saboteur would probably need the
help of a civil servant or government contractor to get into the ones
under Whitehall.
The
menace of biological weapons was first taken seriously by the British
government in the 1930s. For many years, military planners saw germ
weapons as part of conventional warfare: "bugs" to be
loaded into bombs and fired off at the enemy in another country.
In
the second world war, Britain produced 5m cattle cakes filled with
anthrax, to be dropped over Germany in retaliation if the Nazis
resorted to germ warfare. The idea was that cattle would eat the
cakes and be killed, weakening German agriculture. There were also
plans to drop anthrax on six German cities.
The
prototype weapons had been tested on the now infamous "death
island" of Gruinard off the north-west coast of Scotland in 1942
and 1943. On this isolated, uninhabited island, scientists exploded
bombs containing anthrax and then studied how many sheep became
infected.
A
declassified account of these trials recorded that these experiments
"demonstrated to the UK and its allies that biological warfare
was not only feasible, but practicable and potent". So powerful
was the contamination of Gruinard that no humans or animals were
allowed to set foot on the island for more than 40 years.
Although
germ warfare was not used in the second world war, its threat was
present throughout the cold war. In the early 1950s, British
officials began to worry that the Soviet Union might instigate
biological sabotage attacks as part of an overall assault on the
country. Because of these fears, scientists from the chemical and
biological warfare establishment at Porton Down, Wiltshire, began the
trials, using the simulant organisms to make the experiments as
realistic as possible.
Over
18 months, the scientists regularly sprayed organisms around the
British Museum's vast underground warehouse at Westwood Quarry, near
Trowbridge, Wiltshire. They were trying to discover how a bacterial
cloud would circulate inside buildings if a saboteur attacked key
government departments in this way. They found that "it is not
difficult to predict the course of events should a bacterial spray be
released by a saboteur inside a large building... diffusion would be
rapid and complete throughout the building".
The
scientists also turned their attention to trains, since "all
types of transport are now generally recognised as being likely to be
one of the most important targets for special operations in a war of
the future. It would be particularly important in the early stages to
hamper the deployment of troops; at later stages, subversive attacks
on trains crowded with both military and civilian personnel might
well cause considerable dislocation." Although their report
envisages a type of conventional war between recognisable states, it
underlines the danger that we may now face from a terrorist attack.
In
1953 and 1954, trials were carried out on a rail line between Exeter
and Salisbury. In one set of experiments, clouds of organisms were
sprayed within a tunnel, enveloping the train as it rushed through.
On other occasions, the organisms were released within trains. Like
the London underground experiments in 1963 and 1964, these trials
revealed that there would have been many victims if real biological
weapons, and not simulants, had been dispersed. Furthermore, the
scientists were stumped about how to counteract a sabotage attack.
More
experiments were planned, but none was actually done. From these
trials alone, it was clear enough that biological sabotage would be
highly effective if properly executed. But there was also another
reason for the ending of the trials - the government was acutely
aware that there would be an uproar if the public found out about
covert military tests in which micro-organisms were sprayed around
populated areas.
During
the cold war, Porton Down scientists conducted more than 200 trials
over vast swaths of Britain, disseminating organisms, and later a
chemical, from planes and ships. In most of these experiments, the
intention was to find out how a biological attack by the Russians
would ravage Britain.
But
all these trials were wrapped in great secrecy, and the government
has started to reveal details only in the past five years. The
experiments in the London underground system were deliberately hidden
under the innocent title of "ventilation trials". Of these,
one senior official wrote: "I am convinced of the vital need for
these trials, which impose no hazard to the public, although clearly
knowledge of them by unauthorised persons could be politically
embarrassing."
Mike
Hood, a former Porton Down scientist, says: "If the Ministry of
Defence had informed the public, all the trials would not have been
worth doing. The public is so ill-informed, and, of course, you would
let a potential enemy know what you were doing."
The
possibility of biological warfare trials in public places has been
off the agenda since the 1970s, as governments have been aware that a
sceptical public would not accept such experiments. Curiously, this
opposition may fade away as worries about biological attacks
intensify.
Porton
Down's experiments showed that biological attacks are feasible, but
experts continually stress that it would be much more difficult to
mount a real attack. There are many obstacles to overcome, such as
producing the germs in sufficient quantities, storing them safely,
and delivering them efficiently. In the long run, these difficulties
may turn out to be the main reason why we don't suffer a biological
assault on Britain.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.