‘Sinister legislation’: Cloud act passes without fanfare
RT,
24
March, 2018
President
Trump on Friday prevented another government shutdown by signing a
$1.3 trillion federal spending bill. Nestled within the 2,200-page
document was a controversial act, revolutionizing the way the
government handles data.
The
CLOUD act was passed without much fanfare. The controversial
legislation has been described by the American Civil Liberties Union
(ACLU) as both sinister and dangerous. It deals with the manner in
which the US government can access data, needed for law enforcement
operations on United States citizens, that is stored on overseas
servers.
The
legislation was tacked onto the mammoth spending bill on Wednesday
night. It also changes the way foreign governments can request
information on their citizens from US tech firms.
Previously
the law required the government to have mutual legal-assistance
treaties with their foreign counterparts. These governments would
then contact tech giants with law enforcement requests directly
without using the department of justice as an intermediary.
Tech
companies could, if they so wished, resist these requests. The CLOUD
act strips away a layer of judicial review which critics feel gives
too much power to the executive branch. It is the executive branch
that decides which governments have access to information.
In
other words the president can, according to the Electronic Frontier
Foundation (EFF) “enter into “executive agreements” with
foreign governments that would allow each government to acquire
users’ data stored in the other country, without following each
other’s privacy laws.”
Detractors
say that this action will allow countries with questionable
human-rights records to access information on their citizens without
needing a warrant. Let’s say for the sake of argument Saudi Arabia
enters into an executive agreement with America. As US based internet
companies host the majority of internet traffic, Saudi Arabia could
wiretap a Saudi citizen located anywhere on earth without any of the
safeguards put in place by US law. Saudi Arabia would not need a
warrant to do so or even notify the US government that they are
monitoring the Saudi citizen. The same is true of any country that
has signed an “executive agreement” with the US.
The
US Supreme Court will review a Department of Justice request to
overturn a landmark appeals court decision in favor of Microsoft over
protections for company data stored overseas, mostly out of...
“US
and foreign police will have new mechanisms to seize data across the
globe. Because of this failure, your private emails, your online
chats, your Facebook, Google, Flickr photos, your Snapchat videos,
your private lives online, your moments shared digitally between only
those you trust, will be open to foreign law enforcement without a
warrant and with few restrictions on using and sharing your
information,” the EFF wrote in a blog post.
Despite
opposition from various civil liberties groups and privacy advocates
the act received broad bipartisan party support, big tech companies
such as Microsoft also welcome the CLOUD act’s passing. “Today is
an important day for privacy rights around the world, for
international relations, and for building trust in the technology we
all rely on every day,” Microsoft President Brad Smith wrote in a
statement.
Today is an important day for privacy rights around the world, for international relations, and for building trust in the technology we all rely on every day.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.