UN REMOVES CHARGES AGAINST RUSSIA & SYRIA REGARDING AIR STRIKE ON HUMANITARIAN CONVOY IN SYRIA
21
September, 2016
The
UN has revised its recently released statement regarding the
humanitarian convoy affected by an attack in Syria. The phrase
“air strikes” were replaced with references to unspecified
“attacks.” Change of the text of the statement came after
explanations of the Russian side.
Earlier,
the UN reported that the convoy was damaged “as a result of an
airstrike.” In response, the Russian delegation noted that that
neither the Russian
Aerospace Forces,
nor the Syrian Air Forces have attacked the convoy with humanitarian
aid.
Spokesman
for the Russian Defense Ministry, Major-General Igor Konashenkov,
said that after studying a video, no signs of aircraft ammunition’s
hits on the humanitarian convoy on the outskirts of Aleppo have been
identified. He also reminded that on Monday, terrorists of the Jabhat
Fateh al-Sham (previously known as the Jabhat al-Nusra or the
Al-Nusra Front) group began their offensive on Aleppo precisely in
this direction, using “powerful artillery fire from tanks, cannon
gunnery and various multiple rocket launchers.”
According
to Konashenkov, the photos show that there are no relevant funnels,
and vehicles do not have hull damages and fractures of its structures
from the blast wave of the aero-ammunition. He also added that Russia
had used drones to monitor the convoy but only to a certain point.
“Around
13:40 Moscow time (10:40 GMT), the aid convoy has successfully
reached the destination. The Russian side did not monitor the convoy
after this, and its movements were only known to militants, who were
controlled the area,” Konashenkov said.
The
spokesman also noted that a pickup truck with a large-caliber mortar,
used by terrorists, can be clearly seen in the
footage.
“The video clearly shows how terrorists are relocating a pickup
truck with a large-caliber mortar,” he said.
y
After
this, the UN has decided to modify the text of the statement. The new
wording states that the convoy suffered “as a result of an unknown
attack.”
“We
are not in a position to determine whether these were in fact
airstrikes. We are in a position to say that the convoy was
attacked,” a representative of the UN for Humanitarian Affairs,
Jens Laerke, said. According to his words, mention of the air strike
in the early edition of the UN document is a result of a drafting
error.
According
to UN Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs, Stephen
O’Brien, the attack may be considered a war crime, if intentionally
directing attacks against volunteers of the humanitarian organization
is proved.
However,
despite the new UN statement, the US continues to believe that Russia
is responsible for the incident.
US
President Barack Obama’s national security adviser, Ben Rhodes,
said that all indications are “that this was an airstrike.”
“There
only could have been two entities responsible: either the Syrian
regime or the Russian government. In any event, we hold the Russian
government responsible,” he said.
On
Monday evening, a humanitarian convoy of the UN and the Red Crescent
came under an air attack on the Castello
Highway.
As a result of the attack, at least 18 vehicles were destroyed, and
12 people were killed.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.