Andrea, who had her own personal details leaked is absolutely right on this. The number one problem is APATHY.
Apathy will allow Key and his cronies to get away with what they want.
Silence
on surveillance not healthy
Andrea
Vance
NEIL BOND
8
March, 2015
OPINION:
Nicky Hager must wonder why he bothers.
The
journalist brought the Snowden documents to New Zealand in the last
week, to be met with a collective shrug of shoulders. Maybe you are
unmoved at the Government Communications Security Bureau spying on
Pacific neighbours. Perhaps you don't care if your emails, texts and
Facebook messages are hoovered up and stored in a US data bank. Or
that the GCSB is little more than an outpost of the US National
Security Agency. But, with a pending significant review and a likely
increase in their electronic reach, there are still a few reasons to
take the leaked papers seriously.
READ
THE FILES IN FULL: GCSB
update 2010* GCSB
update 2012* Second
Party National Identity RulesREAD
MORE: * Spying
on the family* Satellites
are targeted by Waihopai
1
NO-ONE'S GOT THIS
Yes,
yes, spies work in secret. That's as it should be. But to prevent
abuse of the immense power offered by bulk data collection, robust
oversight mechanisms are crucial. Yet, they barely exist here.
Despite recent vague promises to be more open, spy agencies remain in
the shadows. More than a year after her appointment - and two years
after an overhaul - watchdog Cheryl Gwyn released her first report
but says she didn't have enough information to determine if the
agencies operate differently after an illegal spying scandal. The
responsible parliamentary committee is equally toothless and Chris
Finlayson, minister in charge, has dismissed public deliberation over
spy legislation as "chit chat."
2
DIRTY POLITICS
In
an abuse of power, Prime Minister John Key's staff used information
supplied by the Security Intelligence Service in a partisan hit job
on then-Opposition leader Phil Goff. Key has also selectively used
intelligence to justify a controversial decision to send troops to
Iraq and further boost surveillance powers. At the same time, he's
refused to make public full details. Governments are perfectly
entitled to argue national security as a reason for keeping
intelligence secret. But it's dangerous when politicians use
sensitive - and partial - snippets of information to push their own
agenda. Or bully those they don't agree with.
3
THE APATHY
Key,
probably quite correctly, assesses that the public care more about
snapper than spying. The initial revelations from the Snowden
archives actually galvanised his support. It gives Key the confidence
to vilify journalists, like Glenn Greenwald and Hager. That is
bolstered when other media outlets slavishly report his pre-emptive
strikes, even before scrutinising their investigative work, or the
evidence. But the absence of debate about surveillance is not
healthy. This is where abuses go unnoticed and thrive. And it's
Orwellian when Key shuts down pertinent questions with: you don't
understand the detail, and the journalists are wrong.
4
THE CONTRADICTIONS
Despite
the Government's regular assurances the GCSB are acting legally, with
each set of revelations, come contradictions. Back in September, when
asked if bulk data collection tools like XKeyscore were being used on
Kiwis, Key said: "We're not collecting wholesale information. We
don't have the capability for mass surveillance." The Snowden
documents tell a different story: describing how emails, browsing
sessions, and chat messages from 150 different locations are
harvested through Waihopai, using XKeyscore. Snowden often came
across New Zealanders' data while using XKeyscore in his work and Key
conceded he might well be right. Whether it came from surveillance by
the GCSB was never proven. We can only take Key's word that New
Zealanders are not subject to mass surveillance by their own agency -
and he promised to resign if it happened. But he's wrong to say the
GCSB don't have the tools.
Snowden
files: NZ's spying on the family
NICKY
HAGER, RYAN GALLAGHER AND ANTHONY HUBBARD
NEIL BOND
8
March, 2015
In
the Cook Islands they hold New Zealand passports, are eligible for
New Zealand social services and New Zealand is responsible for their
foreign affairs.
The same in Niue.
Leaked
Edward Snowden documents, published for the first time today, reveal
New Zealand is spying on them anyway – despite residents being New
Zealanders.
Some
of them don't like it.
The
people of both these tiny nations are New Zealand citizens, and the
GCSB is legally barred from eavesdropping on New Zealand citizens'
phone calls and emails except under a warrant.
However,
a United States National Security Agency document, which explains
GCSB targeting rules to US spies, says: "Note: The governments
of Cook Islands and Niue may be targeted, but not their citizens
since they are entitled to hold New Zealand passports."
The
exception is made to allow spying on all Cook Island and Niue
politicians and public servants, even though they too are New Zealand
citizens.
Asked
this weekend if the GCSB had changed the rule seen in the NSA
document that surveillance of the Cook Islands and Niue governments
is permitted, acting GCSB director Una Jagose said: "We do not
comment on operational matters.... Everything we do is authorised
under legislation and subject to independent oversight."
Veteran
Cook Island politician Norman George says the idea of the GCSB
snooping on the Cook Islands was as absurd as "sending a spy
team to Christchurch or Whangarei". The idea is "more
ridiculous than serious", says George, who spent 32 years as a
Cook Islands MP and still works as a lawyer in Rarotonga.
Cook
Islanders were New Zealand citizens and were not just brothers of the
Kiwis "but more like twins, because in all the wars New Zealand
has been involved with, we have been involved", he said.
"There
are no terrorists in the Cook Islands. We are peaceloving Christians
– to spy on us is....frankly, bad manners."
Cook
Island Opposition leader William Heather was shocked and disappointed
to learn that the GCSB spied on the Cooks. Why, he asked, would New
Zealand "spy on the family?"
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.