Posts
First Oil, Now Shale Gas Set To Crash Amid "Orgy Of Over-Production"
18
April, 2015
Submitted
by Arthur Berman via OilPrice.com,
Spending cuts for
oil-directed drilling have dominated first quarter 2015 energy
news but
rig counts for shale gas drilling are too high.
Investors should
pay attention to this growing problem. Bank of America fears
sub-$2
gas prices now that winter heating worries are over. Low
natural gas prices affect the economics for gas-rich oil
production in the Eagle Ford Shale and Permian basin plays as
well as for the shale gas plays.
Meanwhile,
an orgy of over-production is taking place in the Marcellus
Shale. Well
head prices are now below $1.50 per thousand cubic feet of gas
because of limited take-away capacity and near-saturation of
regional demand. Even companies in the Wyoming, Susquehanna,
Allegheny and Washington County core areas of the Marcellus play
are losing money at these prices.
The rig
count for shale gas plays has decreased by only half as much as
for the tight oil plays.
The reason appears to be that most shale gas companies do not
have significant positions in the tight oil plays and must
continue to drill to maintain production levels.
Shale gas rig
counts have dropped only 19% for horizontal rigs and 25% for all
rigs from 2014 highs. The corresponding decrease for tight oil
plays is 41% and 46%, respectively, as shown in the table below.
Rig count
change table for tight oil vs. shale gas plays as of March 20,
2015. Source: Baker Hughes and Labyrinth Consulting Services,
Inc. (Click Image To Enlarge)
This has puzzled
me because the shale gas plays are not commercial at less than
about $6/mmBtu except in small parts of the Marcellus core areas
where $4 prices break even. Natural gas prices have averaged less
than $3/mmBtu for the first quarter of 2015 and are currently at
their lowest levels in more than 2 years.
Henry Hub
daily and quarterly average natural gas prices. Source: EIA and
Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.(Click Image To Enlarge)
Most shale
gas producers either do not have positions in the tight oil plays
or are strongly gas-weighted in their production mix. These
companies must continue to drill in shale gas plays despite poor
economics in order to avoid the consequences of falling
production levels.
The only criterion
that seems to matter to investors these days is production
guidance. If production drops, stock value will fall even farther
than it has already. This will trigger loan covenants if asset
values fall below thresholds set out in the loan agreements. When
that happens, the loans will be called unless the companies can
come up with more cash. This might result in bankruptcy. So, the
drilling must continue as long as there is capital.
The table below
shows the companies that have overlapping positions in both tight
oil and shale gas plays based on current drilling activity.
Current rig
counts for companies with positions in both tight oil and shale
gas plays. Source: DrillingInfo and Labyrinth Consulting
Services, Inc. Rig counts may differ from Baker Hughes because
the source is different. (Click Image To Enlarge)
All companies in
the table except Continental Resources are gas-weighted so
maintaining gas production levels is important to them for the
same reasons it is important to operators without tight oil
exposure. Overall, the companies in the table operate only about
one-third of all rigs in the shale gas plays. Shale gas is
otherwise characterized by a different set of companies that feel
they have no choice but to continue drilling and hope that
investors don’t notice or are.
Shale gas rig
count by operator. Source: DrillingInfo and Labyrinth Consulting
Services, Inc. Rig counts may vary from Baker Hughes because the
source is different. (Click Image To Enlarge)
But don’t
oil-weighted companies face the same concerns about production
levels?
I
compared the change in rig count from January to March 2015 by
operators in the Eagle Ford Shale play to understand how rig
counts are being reduced. I found that key operators were
strategically reducing their activity to the best locations in
core areas in order to affect production levels the least (see
chart below).
Eagle Ford
Shale rig count comparison by operator, January and March 2015.
Source: DrillingInfo and Labyrinth Consulting Services,
Inc.(Click Image To Enlarge)
The next most
active class of operators are holding drilling fairly constant in
this most productive of tight oil plays. Then, there are a small
number of new entrants to the play that are more than balanced by
operators exiting the play. My
previous post on Eagle Ford well performance showed that
there are ample locations in the most commercial parts of the
core areas for well-positioned operators to optimize production
with fewer new wells.
It is worth noting
that the top group of operators in the Eagle Ford Shale play have
reasonably good balance sheets (see the table in my previous
post) and are not particularly vulnerable to loan covenant
threshold triggers. This cannot be said for many of the top
operators in the shale gas plays shown in the table below.
Summary table
of 2014 year-end financial data for natural gas-weighted U.S.
land-based E&P companies. All dollar amounts in millions of
U.S. dollars. FCF=free cash flow; CF/CE=cash flow from
operations/capital expenditures. Source: Google Finance and
Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc. (Click Image To Enlarge)
The table shows
financial data through year-end 2014. What it reveals is not
pretty. 2014 negative cash flow reached $15.5 billion, an
increase of $7.2 billion over 2013. Much of this increase
involved Southwestern Energy’s puzzling
acquisition of Chesapeake’s West Virginia Marcellus Shale
position that increased that company’s negative cash flow by
almost $5 billion over 2013.
On average,
shale-gas companies earned only 68 cents for every dollar that
they spent in 2014. Total debt increased almost $10 billion to
$93.5 billion and average debt exceeded stated equity by 18%
excluding companies with negative equity including the
now-bankrupt Quicksilver Reяources.
Shale
gas plays are commercial failures. The misuse of capital to
continue to increase production while destroying price and
shareholder equity has gone on for too long. Investors should
demand that shale gas companies cut rig counts at least as much
as tight oil companies have.
Rig Count
Summary for the Week Ending March 20, 2015
Rig counts are
important today because they may indicate future trends for oil
prices. Horizontal wells in the Bakken, Eagle Ford and Permian
basin plays produced about 3.5 million barrels of crude oil per
day in November 2014 (see table below). These are, therefore, the
key plays to watch for rig count decreases.
U.S. key tight
oil play production. Source: Drilling Info and Labyrinth
Consulting Services, Inc. (Click Image To Enlarge)
The horizontal rig
count for these key plays–Bakken-Eagle Ford-Permian HRZ-dropped
25 rigs this week (23 rigs last week) and was down 40% from the
2014 maximum. The horizontal rig count for tight oil plays
overall dropped 22 rigs this week (32 last week) and is 41% lower
than the 2014 maximum (see the first table above in this post).
Rigs for all tight oil plays were down 31 this week (39 last
week) and are 46% lower than 2014 maximum rig counts.
Summary of
most changed rig counts by play. Source: Baker Hughes and
Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.(Click Image To Enlarge)
The plays with the
greatest change from their respective 2014 maximum rig counts may
be viewed as the least commercially attractive to producers. This
suggests that the Barnett, Granite Wash, and Permian All are the
least attractive.
It is interesting
that the Bakken moved into this category this week. Well head
prices in the Bakken have now fallen below $30 per barrel. The
play is geologically solid but wells are expensive, the pay-out
times are fairly long because relatively low decline rates for a
shale play, and rail transport adds a lot to the cost of each
barrel of oil.
The overall U.S.
rig count for the week ending March 20, 2015 was 1,069 of which
1,030 were land rigs. Only about 25% of total land rigs and 11%
of horizontal rigs are drilling outside of the major shale gas
and tight oil plays. Detailed data for all of the plays are shown
in the table below.
Summary table
for all U.S. land rig counts. Source: Baker Hughes and Labyrinth
Consulting Services, Inc. (Click Image To Enlarge)
This and other
data continues to suggest decreasing U.S. tight oil production
and increasing world demand. Rig count continues to fall for the
critical oil-producing plays and that means that things are on
track for an oil-price recovery sooner than later.
Investors
should carefully examine why shale gas players have not reduced
rig counts more.
Continued
drilling in the Marcellus will crush natural gas prices further.
The
fact that there are 34 rigs running in the Haynesville Shale is
economically baffling. We may only speculate on why there are 51
rigs in the Woodford Shale and why some operators now call it the
SCOOP play.
Submitted
by Arthur Berman via OilPrice.com,
Spending cuts for oil-directed drilling have dominated first quarter 2015 energy news but rig counts for shale gas drilling are too high.
Investors should pay attention to this growing problem. Bank of America fears sub-$2 gas prices now that winter heating worries are over. Low natural gas prices affect the economics for gas-rich oil production in the Eagle Ford Shale and Permian basin plays as well as for the shale gas plays.
Meanwhile, an orgy of over-production is taking place in the Marcellus Shale. Well head prices are now below $1.50 per thousand cubic feet of gas because of limited take-away capacity and near-saturation of regional demand. Even companies in the Wyoming, Susquehanna, Allegheny and Washington County core areas of the Marcellus play are losing money at these prices.
The rig count for shale gas plays has decreased by only half as much as for the tight oil plays. The reason appears to be that most shale gas companies do not have significant positions in the tight oil plays and must continue to drill to maintain production levels.
Shale gas rig counts have dropped only 19% for horizontal rigs and 25% for all rigs from 2014 highs. The corresponding decrease for tight oil plays is 41% and 46%, respectively, as shown in the table below.
Rig count change table for tight oil vs. shale gas plays as of March 20, 2015. Source: Baker Hughes and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc. (Click Image To Enlarge)
This has puzzled me because the shale gas plays are not commercial at less than about $6/mmBtu except in small parts of the Marcellus core areas where $4 prices break even. Natural gas prices have averaged less than $3/mmBtu for the first quarter of 2015 and are currently at their lowest levels in more than 2 years.
Henry Hub daily and quarterly average natural gas prices. Source: EIA and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.(Click Image To Enlarge)
Most shale gas producers either do not have positions in the tight oil plays or are strongly gas-weighted in their production mix. These companies must continue to drill in shale gas plays despite poor economics in order to avoid the consequences of falling production levels.
The only criterion that seems to matter to investors these days is production guidance. If production drops, stock value will fall even farther than it has already. This will trigger loan covenants if asset values fall below thresholds set out in the loan agreements. When that happens, the loans will be called unless the companies can come up with more cash. This might result in bankruptcy. So, the drilling must continue as long as there is capital.
The table below shows the companies that have overlapping positions in both tight oil and shale gas plays based on current drilling activity.
Current rig counts for companies with positions in both tight oil and shale gas plays. Source: DrillingInfo and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc. Rig counts may differ from Baker Hughes because the source is different. (Click Image To Enlarge)
All companies in the table except Continental Resources are gas-weighted so maintaining gas production levels is important to them for the same reasons it is important to operators without tight oil exposure. Overall, the companies in the table operate only about one-third of all rigs in the shale gas plays. Shale gas is otherwise characterized by a different set of companies that feel they have no choice but to continue drilling and hope that investors don’t notice or are.
Shale gas rig count by operator. Source: DrillingInfo and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc. Rig counts may vary from Baker Hughes because the source is different. (Click Image To Enlarge)
But don’t oil-weighted companies face the same concerns about production levels?
I compared the change in rig count from January to March 2015 by operators in the Eagle Ford Shale play to understand how rig counts are being reduced. I found that key operators were strategically reducing their activity to the best locations in core areas in order to affect production levels the least (see chart below).
Eagle Ford Shale rig count comparison by operator, January and March 2015. Source: DrillingInfo and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.(Click Image To Enlarge)
The next most active class of operators are holding drilling fairly constant in this most productive of tight oil plays. Then, there are a small number of new entrants to the play that are more than balanced by operators exiting the play. My previous post on Eagle Ford well performance showed that there are ample locations in the most commercial parts of the core areas for well-positioned operators to optimize production with fewer new wells.
It is worth noting that the top group of operators in the Eagle Ford Shale play have reasonably good balance sheets (see the table in my previous post) and are not particularly vulnerable to loan covenant threshold triggers. This cannot be said for many of the top operators in the shale gas plays shown in the table below.
Summary table of 2014 year-end financial data for natural gas-weighted U.S. land-based E&P companies. All dollar amounts in millions of U.S. dollars. FCF=free cash flow; CF/CE=cash flow from operations/capital expenditures. Source: Google Finance and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc. (Click Image To Enlarge)
The table shows financial data through year-end 2014. What it reveals is not pretty. 2014 negative cash flow reached $15.5 billion, an increase of $7.2 billion over 2013. Much of this increase involved Southwestern Energy’s puzzling acquisition of Chesapeake’s West Virginia Marcellus Shale position that increased that company’s negative cash flow by almost $5 billion over 2013.
On average, shale-gas companies earned only 68 cents for every dollar that they spent in 2014. Total debt increased almost $10 billion to $93.5 billion and average debt exceeded stated equity by 18% excluding companies with negative equity including the now-bankrupt Quicksilver Reяources.
Shale gas plays are commercial failures. The misuse of capital to continue to increase production while destroying price and shareholder equity has gone on for too long. Investors should demand that shale gas companies cut rig counts at least as much as tight oil companies have.
Rig Count Summary for the Week Ending March 20, 2015
Rig counts are important today because they may indicate future trends for oil prices. Horizontal wells in the Bakken, Eagle Ford and Permian basin plays produced about 3.5 million barrels of crude oil per day in November 2014 (see table below). These are, therefore, the key plays to watch for rig count decreases.
U.S. key tight oil play production. Source: Drilling Info and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc. (Click Image To Enlarge)
The horizontal rig count for these key plays–Bakken-Eagle Ford-Permian HRZ-dropped 25 rigs this week (23 rigs last week) and was down 40% from the 2014 maximum. The horizontal rig count for tight oil plays overall dropped 22 rigs this week (32 last week) and is 41% lower than the 2014 maximum (see the first table above in this post). Rigs for all tight oil plays were down 31 this week (39 last week) and are 46% lower than 2014 maximum rig counts.
Summary of most changed rig counts by play. Source: Baker Hughes and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.(Click Image To Enlarge)
The plays with the greatest change from their respective 2014 maximum rig counts may be viewed as the least commercially attractive to producers. This suggests that the Barnett, Granite Wash, and Permian All are the least attractive.
It is interesting that the Bakken moved into this category this week. Well head prices in the Bakken have now fallen below $30 per barrel. The play is geologically solid but wells are expensive, the pay-out times are fairly long because relatively low decline rates for a shale play, and rail transport adds a lot to the cost of each barrel of oil.
The overall U.S. rig count for the week ending March 20, 2015 was 1,069 of which 1,030 were land rigs. Only about 25% of total land rigs and 11% of horizontal rigs are drilling outside of the major shale gas and tight oil plays. Detailed data for all of the plays are shown in the table below.
Summary table for all U.S. land rig counts. Source: Baker Hughes and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc. (Click Image To Enlarge)
This and other data continues to suggest decreasing U.S. tight oil production and increasing world demand. Rig count continues to fall for the critical oil-producing plays and that means that things are on track for an oil-price recovery sooner than later.
Investors should carefully examine why shale gas players have not reduced rig counts more. Continued drilling in the Marcellus will crush natural gas prices further. The fact that there are 34 rigs running in the Haynesville Shale is economically baffling. We may only speculate on why there are 51 rigs in the Woodford Shale and why some operators now call it the SCOOP play.
Spending cuts for oil-directed drilling have dominated first quarter 2015 energy news but rig counts for shale gas drilling are too high.
Investors should pay attention to this growing problem. Bank of America fears sub-$2 gas prices now that winter heating worries are over. Low natural gas prices affect the economics for gas-rich oil production in the Eagle Ford Shale and Permian basin plays as well as for the shale gas plays.
Meanwhile, an orgy of over-production is taking place in the Marcellus Shale. Well head prices are now below $1.50 per thousand cubic feet of gas because of limited take-away capacity and near-saturation of regional demand. Even companies in the Wyoming, Susquehanna, Allegheny and Washington County core areas of the Marcellus play are losing money at these prices.
The rig count for shale gas plays has decreased by only half as much as for the tight oil plays. The reason appears to be that most shale gas companies do not have significant positions in the tight oil plays and must continue to drill to maintain production levels.
Shale gas rig counts have dropped only 19% for horizontal rigs and 25% for all rigs from 2014 highs. The corresponding decrease for tight oil plays is 41% and 46%, respectively, as shown in the table below.
Rig count change table for tight oil vs. shale gas plays as of March 20, 2015. Source: Baker Hughes and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc. (Click Image To Enlarge)
This has puzzled me because the shale gas plays are not commercial at less than about $6/mmBtu except in small parts of the Marcellus core areas where $4 prices break even. Natural gas prices have averaged less than $3/mmBtu for the first quarter of 2015 and are currently at their lowest levels in more than 2 years.
Henry Hub daily and quarterly average natural gas prices. Source: EIA and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.(Click Image To Enlarge)
Most shale gas producers either do not have positions in the tight oil plays or are strongly gas-weighted in their production mix. These companies must continue to drill in shale gas plays despite poor economics in order to avoid the consequences of falling production levels.
The only criterion that seems to matter to investors these days is production guidance. If production drops, stock value will fall even farther than it has already. This will trigger loan covenants if asset values fall below thresholds set out in the loan agreements. When that happens, the loans will be called unless the companies can come up with more cash. This might result in bankruptcy. So, the drilling must continue as long as there is capital.
The table below shows the companies that have overlapping positions in both tight oil and shale gas plays based on current drilling activity.
Current rig counts for companies with positions in both tight oil and shale gas plays. Source: DrillingInfo and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc. Rig counts may differ from Baker Hughes because the source is different. (Click Image To Enlarge)
All companies in the table except Continental Resources are gas-weighted so maintaining gas production levels is important to them for the same reasons it is important to operators without tight oil exposure. Overall, the companies in the table operate only about one-third of all rigs in the shale gas plays. Shale gas is otherwise characterized by a different set of companies that feel they have no choice but to continue drilling and hope that investors don’t notice or are.
Shale gas rig count by operator. Source: DrillingInfo and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc. Rig counts may vary from Baker Hughes because the source is different. (Click Image To Enlarge)
But don’t oil-weighted companies face the same concerns about production levels?
I compared the change in rig count from January to March 2015 by operators in the Eagle Ford Shale play to understand how rig counts are being reduced. I found that key operators were strategically reducing their activity to the best locations in core areas in order to affect production levels the least (see chart below).
Eagle Ford Shale rig count comparison by operator, January and March 2015. Source: DrillingInfo and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.(Click Image To Enlarge)
The next most active class of operators are holding drilling fairly constant in this most productive of tight oil plays. Then, there are a small number of new entrants to the play that are more than balanced by operators exiting the play. My previous post on Eagle Ford well performance showed that there are ample locations in the most commercial parts of the core areas for well-positioned operators to optimize production with fewer new wells.
It is worth noting that the top group of operators in the Eagle Ford Shale play have reasonably good balance sheets (see the table in my previous post) and are not particularly vulnerable to loan covenant threshold triggers. This cannot be said for many of the top operators in the shale gas plays shown in the table below.
Summary table of 2014 year-end financial data for natural gas-weighted U.S. land-based E&P companies. All dollar amounts in millions of U.S. dollars. FCF=free cash flow; CF/CE=cash flow from operations/capital expenditures. Source: Google Finance and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc. (Click Image To Enlarge)
The table shows financial data through year-end 2014. What it reveals is not pretty. 2014 negative cash flow reached $15.5 billion, an increase of $7.2 billion over 2013. Much of this increase involved Southwestern Energy’s puzzling acquisition of Chesapeake’s West Virginia Marcellus Shale position that increased that company’s negative cash flow by almost $5 billion over 2013.
On average, shale-gas companies earned only 68 cents for every dollar that they spent in 2014. Total debt increased almost $10 billion to $93.5 billion and average debt exceeded stated equity by 18% excluding companies with negative equity including the now-bankrupt Quicksilver Reяources.
Shale gas plays are commercial failures. The misuse of capital to continue to increase production while destroying price and shareholder equity has gone on for too long. Investors should demand that shale gas companies cut rig counts at least as much as tight oil companies have.
Rig Count Summary for the Week Ending March 20, 2015
Rig counts are important today because they may indicate future trends for oil prices. Horizontal wells in the Bakken, Eagle Ford and Permian basin plays produced about 3.5 million barrels of crude oil per day in November 2014 (see table below). These are, therefore, the key plays to watch for rig count decreases.
U.S. key tight oil play production. Source: Drilling Info and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc. (Click Image To Enlarge)
The horizontal rig count for these key plays–Bakken-Eagle Ford-Permian HRZ-dropped 25 rigs this week (23 rigs last week) and was down 40% from the 2014 maximum. The horizontal rig count for tight oil plays overall dropped 22 rigs this week (32 last week) and is 41% lower than the 2014 maximum (see the first table above in this post). Rigs for all tight oil plays were down 31 this week (39 last week) and are 46% lower than 2014 maximum rig counts.
Summary of most changed rig counts by play. Source: Baker Hughes and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.(Click Image To Enlarge)
The plays with the greatest change from their respective 2014 maximum rig counts may be viewed as the least commercially attractive to producers. This suggests that the Barnett, Granite Wash, and Permian All are the least attractive.
It is interesting that the Bakken moved into this category this week. Well head prices in the Bakken have now fallen below $30 per barrel. The play is geologically solid but wells are expensive, the pay-out times are fairly long because relatively low decline rates for a shale play, and rail transport adds a lot to the cost of each barrel of oil.
The overall U.S. rig count for the week ending March 20, 2015 was 1,069 of which 1,030 were land rigs. Only about 25% of total land rigs and 11% of horizontal rigs are drilling outside of the major shale gas and tight oil plays. Detailed data for all of the plays are shown in the table below.
Summary table for all U.S. land rig counts. Source: Baker Hughes and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc. (Click Image To Enlarge)
This and other data continues to suggest decreasing U.S. tight oil production and increasing world demand. Rig count continues to fall for the critical oil-producing plays and that means that things are on track for an oil-price recovery sooner than later.
Investors should carefully examine why shale gas players have not reduced rig counts more. Continued drilling in the Marcellus will crush natural gas prices further. The fact that there are 34 rigs running in the Haynesville Shale is economically baffling. We may only speculate on why there are 51 rigs in the Woodford Shale and why some operators now call it the SCOOP play.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.