Urgent:
Britain stages Russia poisoning, drowns in lies
Inessa S
If you were running for the presidency of a country, and about to host a major international event – would you poison a defector, who many years earlier was in your possession, with a toxic substance that leads right back to you? It seems the Russian cookie monster always leaves a convenient cookie crumb trail – or so the Western audience is led to believe. All symptoms of a provocation are clear.
If you were running for the presidency of a country, and about to host a major international event – would you poison a defector, who many years earlier was in your possession, with a toxic substance that leads right back to you? It seems the Russian cookie monster always leaves a convenient cookie crumb trail – or so the Western audience is led to believe. All symptoms of a provocation are clear.
Furthermore, “Novichok”
is not a widely known substance in Russia itself – it was developed
by a chemist who moved to the US and published a book on his
development. Make sure you watch until the end to see the briefing on
the Skripal case by the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
The British side refuses
to provide a sample of the nerve agent used in Salisbury to the
Russian side – because, in order to prove a substance, one must be
able to match it to an existing “control standard”, ie the
country must have the formula. Where it's truly unknown, the
Convention on the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons states that where a
country suspects another of the use in chemical weapons – it must
approach the side in question, provide a sample, and expect a
response within 10 days. Britain, however, disregards international
law and relies instead on public emotion and hysteria. The only sane
Brit, it seems, is Jeremy Corbyn, who is heckled in parliament for
his balanced approach.
In March 2018, Sergei
Skripal and his daughter were found unconscious in Britain’s
Salisbury. Skripal is a former Russian intelligence officer, who for
the cost of a Spanish holiday home, and a couple hundred thousand
one-off payments of the MI6, betrayed Russia. He was sentenced to 13
years in prison, but in 2010, together with 3 others, was pardoned by
the Russian president and exchanged for 10 other intel workers.
Since then Skripal
continued to live in Britain and work for the MI6. Much like the case
of Litvinenko – international law has little to do with the
investigation, all that matters are headlines. Be wary of what you
read!
Good information. I was looking for this for a while amongst all the hysteria in news.
ReplyDelete