This
article appears to have been removed from the original site, South
Front.
In Photos: White Helmets Media Studio Producing “Evidence of Assad Regime War Crimes”
6
March, 2018
A
pro-government media activist, Penelope
Stafyla, has released a
series of photos reportedly showing a media studio of the White
Helmets, which produces “evidence of Assad regime war crimes” in
the Eastern Ghouta region, near the Syrian capital of Damascus.
These
photos are especially interesting amid circulating
reports about a new “chemical attack” by the “Assad regime”
in Eastern Ghouta.
The new “chemical attack” narrative came amid large
gains by government forces against militants groups in
the area and allegedly injured over 30 people.
For
example, Turkey’s Anadolu Agency reported the alleged incident
citing a report by the White Helments (source):
At
least 30 people were treated for breathing difficulties after a
regime chlorine gas attack in the Damascus suburb of Eastern Ghouta,
according to a Syrian civil defense agency on Tuesday.
Several
children and women were among the victims of the attack in Hamuriye
town on Monday, the White Helmets said in a statement.
The
civil defense agency said two of its rescue workers were among the
casualties.
Taliano
talks and listens to the people of Syria. He reveals the courage and
resilience of a Nation and its people in their day to day lives,
after more than six years of US-NATO sponsored terrorism and three
years of US “peacemaking” airstrikes.
Mark
Taliano combines
years of research with on-the-ground observations to present an
informed and well-documented analysis that refutes the
mainstream media narratives on Syria.
Accomplice
To Genocide: US’s Fake News Ghouta Campaign At Its Ugliest Yet
5
March, 2018
Guest
writer Joris de Draeck, creator of Planet News weighs in on the US’s
fake news campaign and East Ghouta hysteria.
From
Ghouta, the fake news campaign to demonize the elected Syrian
government, flares up. The collection of mainstream media, still
respected by so many, lead the pack these days with incessant reports
on how civilians are targeted by the brutal “regime” – a word
they just can not fail to repeat time and again. Ghouta indeed has
been a “rebel” stronghold ever since the early days of the
repulsive and staged “revolt” back in 2011.
It
harbours and has held the individual elements, the individuals,
having been fostered by the anti-Assad campaign. They are called
“Rebels” openly and are nurtured by these Western governments
who’d like to see Syria in shreds by backing diverse groups as the
Kurds, Wahhabi Syrians, Salafist invaders, and external elements like
the “White Helmets”, or the aptly named “Syrian Observatory for
Human Rights”. It should be a warning to these themselves that they
often are referred to as targets, as well as allies. All seems to be
fair in wars against sovereignty.
Writing
this between February 19 and February 22, the media campaign these
days already focused on alleged bombardments by the Syrian forces.
The observations from the ground were that Eastern-Ghouta itself had
not been targeted until February 21 … The government’s focus
before were the area’s supply lines. The Syrian government and its
allies were involved in areas around Ghouta and were calling on
civilians to leave the area and to provide intel if they do. It’s a
strategy which has worked in the past. The resemblance of what
happens now in the Eastern area of Damascus called Ghouta, is eerily
similar to what we read and lived through in that other major city
Aleppo.
However,
the rebels supported by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and their
Western allies, do not allow these civilians to leave. The Wahhabi
predisposition does not – while that same religious conviction does
allow extreme reaction against those who’d not wish to follow the
Sharia law it proclaims.
The
actions in and around Ghouta of the Syrian Arab Army consists of
trying to dissolve the supply lines around it; they are focusing on
movements of armaments and weaponry towards it while trying to
provide for a way out for civilians. When Western consumers read
about six hospitals having been bombed, the only real question they
can ask is: “how many hospitals does a nation build in such a
relatively small district?” Is it one or two – or the amazing
amount of six?
They
should ask themselves if, indeed there are six hospitals, Assad has
not been too caring for his people to build such a massive amount?
Indeed, the number again resembles the count in East-Aleppo where no
less than 19 hospitals were bombarded if mainstream media were to be
believed.
White
Helmets and Other “Moderates”
It
goes to show as well that these same media continuously use
professional-quality footage from videographers close to the White
Helmets. These same media don’t even refrain anymore from referring
to them as Syria Civil Defence while they know full well the White
Helmets can not be called upon using any emergency number, nor are
they part of the International Civil Defense Organization or ICDO. In
fact, as many individuals now know, they were created by an
ex-British army officer and are sponsored by most all Western states
to the tune of ten of millions of dollars a year. If journalists are
unable to at least mention so, they are being dishonest, biased and
far from objective in their reports.
Western
media does report correctly that Eastern-Ghouta is home to civilians
which is no reason to laud them for their inquisitiveness. It does
also appropriately mention that food prices are many times higher
than what they should be and that caring for loved ones has become
increasingly difficult. They should continue with instructing the
gullible public that the main party in control of the district is
none other than Islamist faction Jaish al-Islam backed up by Jabhat
an-Nuṣrah li-ahli ash-Shām which then rebranded to Hayat Tahrir
al-Sham – probably to make it more recognisable and pronounceable
to feverish fans unable to speak Arabic.
Yet
even the latter name is a disguise for their former business card
which would have stated al-Qaeda in Syria; a name they probably
forewent because of the negative connotations the public at large had
because of their alleged involvement on 9/11. These two groups are
then mixed together with a bit of Jabhat al-Nusra. For the record and
because it seems to need repetition to the many lucky journalists
making big bucks writing nonsense: these groups are no sweethearts.
Violence
Against Civilians?
When
the public was confronted with the beheadings these people led, there
was general and appropriate outrage spread throughout page upon page
of mainstream media reports. How these same journalist can now write
in defense of them, is beyond comprehension. The very same rationale
seems to be followed: blame Assad and his allies for everything,
including the desperation civilians go through under the reign of
head-chopping “rebels”.
It
has been proven time and again that the price of food and the lack of
access to medicine in “rebel” areas is not a policy of the Assad
government, but rather that of the above-mentioned extremist groups.
Ask yourself: what does Assad gain by denying his civilians that
access as is alleged? With all eyes on him, does it buy him
international recognition and with Syrian eyes on him, does it buy
him electoral votes?
However
rhetoric these questions are, they are genuine ones to all consumers
of mainstream news. Assad has been lauded for his tolerance before
2011 in a Syria where all religions, even the extreme Wahhabis making
up the larger part of the “rebels” now, were able to practice and
preach. His wife has been called “Rose of the Desert” by Vogue
mere months prior to the “Arab Spring” ruining the steady
progress the country was making. Assad, however much you don’t read
it in mainstream press, is not the destabilizing force and never has
been. It’s the “rebels” which popped up out of nowhere back in
2011 and which were able to, as if on cue, make mainstream headlines
with a protest which lasted for under an hour and which was attended
by dozens, not thousands.
We
are seeing images of bombs, but we are not confronted with the
desperate civilians blowing themselves, their workshop, their wife
and kids to smithereens as did Syrian engineer Nizar Hassan back in
2014, because the alternative – to live under the “reign” of
head-chopping rebels – was a worse prospect. The city Mr. Hassan
lived in was Adra, part of the “Eastern-Ghouta” district so often
mentioned. He probably did so after seeing his fellow citizens caged
and trucked off to undefined destinies and after he witnessed women
being forced to fire rudimentary and indiscriminate missiles on
Damascus while wearing the “rebel Syrian flag”.
Mainstream
Media are Accomplice to Genocide
The
lies mainstream, backed by big-name NGO’s, barf out needs to stop
while the public should be fully conscient about which party says and
does what. It’s not Syria or Russia ever having invaded and
destablized countries based on false pretexts; it is the Western
ones. The public should question which countries there are. It’s
these led by the US and accompanied by an amalgam of nations like
most, if not all of Europe, Saudi-Arabia and Israel. The public
really should have the desastrous outcomes of Libya, Iraq,
Afghanistan, Korea and Vietnam on the top of their minds. If it does
not, and if journalists fail to instruct them, the outlook for Syria
looks bad.
There’s
an analogy to make between East-Aleppo and Eastern-Ghouta. Both
because of how these are framed in mainstream when they were and are
being liberated, as of how the civilians will fare after the more
than necessary cleansing the sovereign government with help of its
allies did and do.
How
many reports have you seen in mainstream about East-Aleppo after it
had “fallen”? None probably. Why didn’t we? Because
East-Aleppo’s civilians are free again. Let’s make sure these in
Eastern-Ghouta are soon. That they do not need to revert to desperate
action like blowing themselves up.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.