Prof.
Hazledine touches lightly on the #1 taboo.
Tim
Hazledine - NZ's optimum population 2 million
New
Zealand’s optimum population was reached 70 years ago, a professor
of economics says.
26
February, 2018
Tim
Hazledine, professor of economics at the University of Auckland, told
Jesse Mulligan New Zealand is over-populated.
To
listen to podcast GO
HERE
“When
I was born it [population] was about 2 million. If we’d stuck at 2
million then houses in Auckland right now would be about the same as
they are in Invercargill right now - about three or four hundred
thousand.”
No
captionPhoto: University of Auckland
And
he doesn’t believe population growth makes us all better off. He
says the opposite is true.
“Economic
growth would be higher per person because resources would be so much
cheaper, we wouldn’t need to put so much of our incomes into
housing.”
Although
he says the population horse has now bolted, governments should not
be “pro-natalist.”
“I
certainly don’t think any responsible government should be
pro-natalist; don’t subsidise babies, we’ve got enough babies in
the world.”
The
most recent variant of globalisation that has prevailed for the last
40 years hasn’t necessarily benefitted New Zealand either, he says.
The
developed world needs to think about manufacturing more at home
again.
“We
actually did better when there wasn’t so much globalisation. It’s
funny to think of it but as late as the 1960s a third of our exports
were wool that went to France and about three other countries.
“Dairy
products went mainly to Britain before Britain joined the European
Community so we’ve always been a trading country much, much more
than any other country you can think of really for a 100 years.”
And
New Zealand’s manufacturing capacity has withered in that time, he
says.
“We
had to diversify a lot more and our core manufacturing industries
that we’d quietly built up through from the 1920s, they were
basically knocked out of the water.”
Globalisation
has offered us cheaper goods, but at a price he says.
“We’re
all buying a lot of cheap stuff from overseas which is basically
built on not paying the workers very much.”
Concerns
over economic sovereignty in the original TPP trade talks were
justified, according to Prof Hazledine.
“Sovereignty
is important. Pharmac which is the New Zealand-owned government
monopoly that negotiates as one and gets a very good price for drugs
- there’s a lot of foreign pharmaceutical companies that would like
to charge us a higher price.
“They
may say: ‘this is unfair to us, unfair to free trade.”
Prof
Hazledine says there are other more important problems global
treaties could tackle besides free trade.
A
tax treaty for example to avoid corporate profits “sloshing around
the world looking for a tax haven.” Which he says has been a “race
to the bottom.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.