It
may just be me but I am not automatically trusting of James Corbett.
Having said that the analyisis here is spot-on.
Below
are the details of a warning by Gary Hart of a possible false flag
against Iran.
I
have found some other enlightening material which I may share soon.
We
Need to Talk About the Iran Protests
The
Corbett Report
TRANSCRIPT
Late
last month reports
emerged of
a secret deal reached between the US and Israel setting out
a wide-ranging
plan to
confront Iran in a number of different areas.
Reports have just come out claiming that the United States and Israel have signed a secret deal to tackle the nuclear threat from Iran, so it looks like the deal isn’t so secret anymore. The far-reaching Memorandum of Understanding was signed on December 12th at the White House following intense talks between both nations and plans to set up four teams to handle various aspects of the Iranian threat. One team will focus on Iranian activityin Syria and Lebanon, another will deal with both diplomatic and intelligence activities to grapple with Iran’s nuclear weapons ambitions, a third will tackle Iran’s ballistic missile program and the fourth will oversee preparations for any escalation by Iran or Hezbollah.
SOURCE: Your Morning News From Israel – Dec. 31, 2017
And
then, just two days after that report broke, just three weeks after
the plan itself was agreed, a wave of protests broke out across Iran.
These protests, originating in discontent over the performance of the
economy under the Rouhani government, soon morphed into rallies,
riots and violence aimed against the Iranian republic itself.
Could
these protests be the result of the US and Israeli plan to undermine
Iran? If these were just two isolated data points then connecting
these dots would be a stretch. But when we put recent events into
their proper perspective, there is no doubt that the US, Israel and
their allies are actively supporting and fomenting regime change in
Iran. And that’s why “We Need to Talk About the Iran Protests.”
From
the scattered and contextless news reporting of the mainstream media,
it might appear that the protests happening right now are, in fact, a
grassroots uprising against an unpopular and repressive regime. After
all, this is what we are told by US Ambassador to the UN, Nikki
Haley.
NIKKI HALEY: Now the Iranian dictatorship is trying to do what it always does, which is to say that the protests were designed by Iran’s enemies. We all know that’s complete nonsense. The demonstrations are completely spontaneous. They are virtually in every city in Iran. This is the precise picture of a long-oppressed people rising up against their dictators.
SOURCE: Ambassador Nikki Haley speaks on Pakistan, Iran
And
surely no one can make the case that the Iranian people do not have
valid reason to be upset at their government.
After
years of rising unemployment and inflation and dwindling hopes for a
foreign investment boom, even Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei
is upset with
the country’s economic outlook under President Hassan Rouhani. The
government’s latest
budget proposal,
sent to parliament just weeks ago, has only made things worse,
cutting an extremely popular cash
transfer program instituted
under previous President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad that gave each Iranian a
stipend of about $90 per month.
The videos of
the earliest demonstrations in this wave of protest, scattered
footage of a few dozen protesters in the northeastern city of Mashhad
calling for economic relief, are in line with the “spontaneous”
uprising being touted by the political puppets and their mainstream
media mouthpieces. But those early protests soon descended into
chaos, mayhem, violence and death.
Now,
with dozens
dead and hundreds arrested,
the question has to be asked: have the initial, grassroots protests
been hijacked by regime change agents?
The
question is by no means outlandish. In June of 2017, Secretary of
State Rex Tillerson admitted to Congress that the government is
actively working with parties inside Iran to help foment regime
change inside the country.
Rep. Ted Poe: I would like to know what the policy is in the US toward Iran. Do we support the current regime? Do we support a philosophy of peaceful regime change?
[…]
Rex Tillerson: Our policy towards Iran is to push back on this hegemony, contain their ability to develop nuclear weapons and to work toward support of those elements inside of Iran that would lead to a peaceful transition of that government. Those elements are there, certainly, as we know.
SOURCE: Fiscal Year 2018 State Department Budget Hearing
That
same month, it was revealed that the CIA has created a new
mission center to
focus exclusively on gathering and analyzing intelligence about Iran.
Ramping
the tension up even further, it was reported just this past week that
the US has given
the green light to
Israel to assassinate Qassem Soleimani, the commander of the Quds
Force, the overseas arm of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard.
All
of this comes on the heels of repeated warnings by President Trump
over the past year that the US was preparing operations against the
Iranian government.
Michael Flynn: President Trump has severely criticized the various agreements reached between Iran and the Obama administration, as well as the United Nations as being weak and ineffective. Instead of being thankful to the United States for these agreements, Iran is now feeling emboldened. As of today, we are officially putting Iran on notice. Thank you.
SOURCE: Michael Flynn: We’re Officially Putting Iran on Notice
Trump: It is far past time for the nations of the world to confront another reckless regime—one that speaks openly of mass murder, vowing death to America, destruction to Israel, and ruin for many leaders and nations in this room. The Iranian government masks a corrupt dictatorship behind the false guise of a democracy. It has turned a wealthy country with a rich history and culture into an economically depleted rogue state whose chief exports are violence, bloodshed, and chaos. The longest-suffering victims of Iran’s leaders are, in fact, its own people.
SOURCE: Trump Slams Iran at UN Speech
Unsolicited
Advice to the Government of Iran
By
Gary Hart
Presuming
that you are not actually ignorant enough to desire war with the
United States, you might be well advised to read the history of the
sinking of the U.S.S. Maine in Havana harbor in 1898 and the history
of the Gulf of Tonkin in 1964.
Having
done so, you will surely recognize that Americans are reluctant to go
to war unless attacked. Until Pearl Harbor, we were even reluctant to
get involved in World War II. For historians of American wars the
question is whether we provoke provocations.
Given
the unilateral U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, you are obviously
thinking the rules have changed. Provocation is no longer required to
take America to war. But even in this instance, we were led to
believe that the mass murderer of American civilians, Osama bin
Laden, was lurking, literally or figuratively, in the vicinity of
Baghdad.
Given
all this, you would probably be well advised to keep your forces,
including clandestine forces, as far away from the Iraqi border as
you can. You might even consider bringing in some neighbors to verify
that you are not shipping arms next door. Tone down the rhetoric on
Zionism. You’ve established your credentials with those in your
world who thrive on that.
If
it makes you feel powerful to hurl accusations at the American eagle,
have at it. Sticks and stones, etc. But, for the next sixteen months
or so, you should not only not take provocative actions, you should
not seem to be doing so.
For
the vast majority of Americans who seek no wider war, in the Middle
East or elsewhere, don’t tempt fate. Don’t give a certain vice
president we know the justification he is seeking to attack your
country. That is unless you happen to like having bombs fall on your
head.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.