Somehow, in the midst of everything, I managed to overlook this.
CrossTalk: GOP's Act of Treason?
Some
do dare call it treason! The letter sent to Iran’s leadership by 47
Republican senators is an unprecedented example of Congressional
overreach in foreign policy. The obvious goal was to undercut the
Obama Administration’s negotiations with Iran. The result will
probably be more global mistrust of Washington. CrossTalking with Jim
Lobe, Fred Fleitz, and Hillary Leverett
Here is the background
Senators
Write Open Letter to Iranian Leader: Don’t Trust Obama
Republican
Senators in the US Congress continue to work around President Obama
as nuclear talks with Iran progress. In their ongoing efforts to
prevent compromise, nearly 50 lawmakers have written directly to
Iranian leadership, warning that while the president’s term is
almost up, Republican opposition will remain.
9
March, 2015
Last
week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivered his
highly-anticipated, highly-ridiculed speech
before US lawmakers. Warning against a nuclear deal
with Iran, Netanyahu was invited by the Republican
Congress, not by the president, as is typically the case.
This
invitation caused a stir in Washington. But now a group of 47
Senators have adopted a new, controversial tactic which similarly
undermines presidential authority. “An Open Letter to the
Leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran,” the letter
begins, and goes on to deliver a not-so-subtle message: when the
president goes, you’ll still have us to contend with.
“It
has come to our attention while observing your nuclear
negotiations with our government that you may not fully
understand our constitutional system,” the letter reads. The
correspondence goes on to explain that system, with sincere
hope that this newfound knowledge will make Tehran “seriously”
reconsider their negotiations.
Firstly,
“while the president negotiates international agreements, Congress
plays the significant role of ratifying them,” the letter
states. It goes on to say that “anything not approved
by Congress is a mere executive agreement.”
The
wording of this first point highlights the unusual nature of the
letter. A group of US lawmakers have written to personally
inform a foreign leader that their president’s word is worthless.
The
second part of the letter goes on to give a haughty lesson
in term limits. “For example,” it reads, “the president
may serve only two 4-year terms, whereas senators may serve an
unlimited number of 6-year terms.” And then, to signify
their own permanence, the letter adds, “President Obama will leave
office in January 2017, while most of us will remain
in office well beyond then – perhaps decades.”
While
the promise of a decades-long reign of one of the most
ineffectual congressional bodies in US history may be more
frightening to the American public than the Iranians, the
Republicans sum up their message clearly enough.
“…Any
agreement regarding your nuclear-weapons program that is not approved
by the Congress [is] nothing more than an executive
agreement between President Obama and Ayatollah Khamenei. The
next president could revoke such an executive agreement with the
stroke of a pen and future Congresses could modify the terms
of the agreement at any time.”
Such
a threat may not be as improbable as it sounds. As the
letter’s organizer, Senator Tom Cotton, told Fox News, several
of the document’s signatures belong to prospective
presidential candidates. Senators Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, and Rand
Paul have all signed, and could all very likely be frontrunners
in the 2016 primaries. Both Jeb Bush and Rick Perry, other
presidential hopefuls, have also independently expressed criticism
of the nuclear negotiations.
“I’d
encourage Hillary Clinton to join us,” Cotton told Fox, though
this seems extremely unlikely.
Talks
between US Secretary of State John Kerry and Iranian
Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif may soon reach a framework
agreement. Whether this will happen before a March 24 deadline –
when a group of Senate Democrats have threatened to place
new sanctions on Iran – seems doubtful.
The
Netanyahu speech and the letter are both bold moves for Congressional
lawmakers. Even if Iranian leadership ignores their warnings, the
letter likely has a second intended purpose: a clear, political
message to the White House.
And the Iranian response -
Here is an American take on the letter, from Newsweek
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.