Buzzing
off! 1 in 10 wild bees faces extinction in Europe, study warns
RT,
21
March, 2015
Nearly
10 percent of some 2,000 species of European wild bees face
extinction, says a recent study, adding that the drivers behind such
a mass disappearance of nature’s top pollinators include the use of
insecticides, fertilizers, and climate change.
The study, co-funded by the European Commission, gives information about 1,965 wild bee species in Europe, including their status, distribution and the dangers they face.
Distribution of threatened bees in Europe. (image from http://ec.europa.eu)
The main threats to bee survival are connected with modern agriculture, says the report, adding that these hazards include intensive arable farming, livestock farming and the continued presence of commercial timber plantations. Climate change may also contribute to mass bee extinction.
READ MORE: Scientists confirm: Pesticides kill America's honey bees
Bees “are threatened with extinction in Europe mainly due to habitat loss as a result of agriculture intensification (e.g., changes in agricultural practices including the use of pesticides and fertilizers), urban development, increased frequency of fires and climate change,” says the study.
Also herbicides can also negatively affect bee diversity, as they “can reduce the availability of flowers on which bees depend and delay the flowering, so the timing between the period when food is most needed by pollinators and food availability is disrupted.”
“Our quality of life – and our future – depends on the many services that nature provides for free. Pollination is one of these services, so it is very worrying to learn that some of our top pollinators [bees] are at risk!” said Karmenu Vella, European Commissioner for Environment, Maritime Affairs and Fisheries.
“If we don’t address the reasons behind this decline in wild bees, and act urgently to stop it, we could pay a very heavy price indeed,” he dded.
READ MORE: 5,000 bees chilled, shaved and microchipped in Australian study to prevent killer diseases
Major threats to bees in Europe. (image from http://ec.europa.eu)
Knowledge about wild bees in Europe is “incomplete, as we are faced with an alarming lack of expertise and resources,” says Jean-Christophe ViĆ©, deputy director of the IUCN Global Species Programme.
“Bees play an essential role in the pollination of our crops. We must urgently invest in further research in order to provide the best possible recommendations on how to reverse their decline,” he said.
READ MORE: 'Beemageddon' delayed: Bumblebee reemergence puzzles scientists
According to the report, every year bees provide crop pollination worth €153 billion globally and €22 billion in Europe.
Population trends of European bees. (image from http://ec.europa.eu)
“In terms of global agricultural production volumes, 35 percent comes from crops that depend on pollinators, mainly insects. Out of the 124 main crops grown for global human consumption, 87 (70 percent) require insect pollination for seed production.”
World’s
forests are fragmenting into tiny patches – risking mass
extinctions
David
Edwards
Lecturer of Conservation Science at University of Sheffield
21
March, 2015
Much of the Earth was once cloaked in vast forests, from the subarctic snowforests to the Amazon and Congo basins. As humankind colonised the far corners of our planet, we cleared large areas to harvest wood, make way for farmland, and build towns and cities.
The loss of forest has wrought dramatic consequences for biodiversity and is the primary driver of the global extinction crisis. I work in Borneo where huge expanses of tropical forest are cleared to make way for palm oil plantations. The biological cost is the replacement of some 150 forest bird species with a few tens of farmland species. But forest is also frequently retained inside or at the edges of oil palm plantations, and this is a pattern that is replicated globally.
The problem, according to new research published in Science Advances, is that the vast majority of remaining forests are fragmented. In other words, remaining forests are increasingly isolated from other forests by a sea of transformed lands, and they are found in ever-smaller sized patches. The shockwaves of loss thus extend far beyond the footprint of deforestation.
Accessible forests
The great outdoors? Only
the blue areas are more than 1km from the edge of the forest. Joe
Sexton/Danxia Song
The team, led by Nick Haddad from North Carolina State University, used the world’s first high-resolution satellite map of tree cover to measure how isolated remaining forests are from a non-forest edge. Edges are created by a plethora of deforesting activities, from roads to cattle pastures and oil wells, as well as by rivers.
They found that more than 70% of remaining forest is within just 1km (about 0.6 miles) of an edge, while a 100 metre stroll from an edge would enable you to reach 20% of global forests.
Comparing across regions, the patterns they find are even starker. In Europe and the US, the vast majority of forest is within 1km of an edge – some of the most “remote” areas in these regions are a stones throw from human activity. “Getting away from it all” has never been more challenging.
If you want remote forests on a large scale you’ll have to head to the Amazon, the Congo, or to a lesser degree, central and far eastern Russia, central Borneo and Papua New Guinea.
Biodiversity reduced
For undisturbed forest,
head to Congo’s blue zone. Joe
Sexton/Danxia Song
Forest species struggle to survive at edges because these places are brighter, windier, and hotter than forest interiors. Edges become choked by rampant vines and invaded by disturbance-tolerant, parasitic or invasive species that outcompete the denizens of dark forest interiors. In Borneo, for example, small forest patches house bird communities that are far more similar to those found in the surrounding oil palm than to those of larger forest tracts.
The survival of large, carbon-rich trees – the building blocks of any intact forest ecosystem – is reduced in smaller and more isolated forest fragments. These patches thus fail to maintain viable populations, which over time are doomed – an “extinction debt” yet to be paid.
Curassows hate deforestation. fPat Murray, CC BY
With so much global forest in close proximity to humans, larger forest animals such as chimpanzees, gorillas, tapirs or curassow birds are being hunted to extinction in individual areas. This shifts animal communities within the forest fragments to one dominated by small-bodied species. Further, hunters are willing to penetrate forests for several kilometres from edges in search of game, effectively making the truly wild global forest estate yet smaller.
Difficult management decisions
Of course, we should not ignore fragmented regions. Some of these, including the Brazilian Atlantic forest, Tropical Andes and Himalayas, share a toxic mix of hyperdiversity, endemic species with tiny ranges, and severe fragmentation. The critically-endangered Munchique wood-wren, for instance, exists only in a handful of peaks in the Colombian Andes, but these are now isolated from each other by cattle pastures and roads. Here we must seek to restore forest cover and improve connectivity between larger fragments if we are to prevent extinctions.
Large patches of the
Amazon remain, but Brazil’s Atlantic forest is rarely more than 1km
from an edge. Clinton
Jenkins
However, the rapid expansion of human populations, greed, and meat consumption mean that more forest is likely to be lost, even if farm yield and efficiency can be improved to help bridge gaps between current and future demand. The difficult question is where should this expansion happen? Given the severe degradation of small and isolated fragments, perhaps conversion could target some of these patches, coupled with wilderness protection and expansion.
Next time I visit my local National Park – the highly fragmented Peak District – I will spare a thought for the species that are being harmed by their habitats being broken up into ever smaller chunks. There are no easy answers to the problems of fragmentation, but our forests urgently need a global management plan
Warmer
Pacific waters, other factors may be harming marine life
18
March, 2015
Record-high
sea-surface temperatures in the Gulf of Alaska and die-offs of sea
lions and seabirds on the West Coast are raising concerns about
changing conditions in the Pacific.
A
report released this week by the U.S. National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) says a massive “warm blob” of
water that is up to 3 C higher than average is spreading south from
Alaska. That, together with other environmental factors, could make
the ocean less productive for many species, including salmon.
The
changes are occurring in addition to an El Nino event that developed
in the Pacific this winter, and which brought warmer water north from
the equatorial Pacific. The warm waters in Alaska developed about one
year ago.
“We
are seeing unprecedented changes in the environment,” Toby
Garfield, director of the environmental research division at the U.S.
Southwest Fisheries Science Center said in a statement.
The
report states that, in addition to higher sea-surface temperatures,
there have also been weaker upwellings of cold currents. Those
upwellings bring nutrients up from deeper ocean levels, enriching the
base of the marine food web.
The
NOAA report states that last summer and fall, the weights of
California sea lion pups were below average in some rookeries, and
many pups died, apparently from starvation.
“That
trend has continued into winter, along with strandings of dead pups.
It is possible that another UME [unusual mortality event] will be
declared soon in 2015,” the report states.
The
NOAA report also says that Cassin’s auklets, especially juveniles,
have been dying in large numbers.
“Many
dead auklets appear emaciated. Cassin’s auklets prey on
zooplankton, and this die-off may be a leading indication of
suboptimal feeding conditions,” the report states.
Dr.
David Bradley, B.C. program manager of Bird Studies Canada, said
Wednesday there is “definitely a spike in [marine bird] casualties
in B.C. this winter.”
But
he said “it’s a big mystery” as to why the birds have been
dying and he is waiting to see whether U.S. researchers can confirm a
correlation between marine-bird deaths and warmer sea-surface
temperatures.
Dr.
Richard Beamish, an emeritus scientist with the Department of
Fisheries and Oceans, said the NOAA study suggests a significant
shift of oceanic conditions is taking place.
“Some
of us, me in particular, believe there are these major climate, ocean
events which we’ve been calling regimes,” he said. “We had a
major regime shift in ’77 and then in ’89, probably another
around 1998 … and since they [are] occurring roughly every 10 years
… most of us have been expecting we’d see a change.”
Dr.
Beamish said regime shifts can have a dramatic impact on salmon
production, causing stocks to crash.
But
some fish species thrive under warmer conditions, and fish rarely
seen off the West Coast can become plentiful.
“We
could have a bizarre season, perhaps with tuna up as far as Alaska,”
he said.
Aaron
Hill, executive director of Watershed Watch Salmon Society, said the
changes are worrying.
“It’s
certainly concerning, because there are a number of factors in
addition to this that are conspiring against B.C. salmon
populations,” he said, noting low snowpacks this winter will lead
to reduced river levels. “If we get another hot summer on top of
that, it will be really bad [for spawning salmon].”
Mr.
Hill urged government to restrict commercial catch levels this year.
“I’d
like to see [Fisheries and Oceans] take a more precautionary approach
to salmon populations under these conditions,” he said. “They are
basing management decisions on the assumption we have a certain level
of productivity in our salmon populations. But with these
environmental conditions right now, that seems like a brash
assumption.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.