Lots of stuff about a Putin crackdown, without any evidence.
What about this?! I
haven’t seen much mention of this anywhere
I've got it! Reports about Putin's crackdown is news; this is propaganda (sic)
CIA Whistleblower Faces 100 Years In Prison
2
March, 2015
CIA
whistleblower, Jeffrey Sterling, faces up to 100 years in prison and
a fine of $2.25 million for blowing the whistle on the CIA
planting false evidence of nuclear weapons in Iran.
Despite
President Obama promising to protect whistleblowers from prosecution
and punishment, Sterling is due to appear in court on April 24th
2015.
Sterling has already been convicted of telling a New York Times reporter specific, classified details regarding a reckless CIA operation that actually helped Iran’s nuclear development.
The
case against Sterling was almost entirely based upon circumstantial
evidence. The news agency, Russia Today summarized Sterling’s
history as follows:
After
joining the CIA on May 14, 1993, Sterling eventually rose to the rank
of case officer and began working with the agency’s Iran Task
Force. Between November 1998 and May 2000, Sterling had been assigned
to a mission conspiring to deliver flawed nuclear blueprints to the
Iranian government codenamed Operation Merlin. Unaware of the design
flaws, the Iranian government would waste years devising a nuclear
weapon that could not detonate.
The
CIA planned to use a Russian nuclear engineer codenamed Merlin to
transport the nuclear blueprints to the Iranians. In a luxurious
hotel room in San Francisco, Sterling and a senior CIA officer gave
the blueprints to Merlin, who immediately identified a flaw even
though he had not been debriefed. Instead of aborting the mission
because the design flaw was too obvious, the senior CIA officer went
ahead with the operation.
After
handing the nuclear blueprints to Merlin, Sterling convinced him to
fly to Vienna and deliver the flawed plans to the visiting Iranian
representatives of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
Fearing retaliation from the Iranian government, Merlin unsealed the
envelope containing the blueprints and inserted a personal letter
warning the Iranians that the blueprints were flawed. Instead of
stunting Iran’s nuclear plans, the CIA inadvertently gave the
Iranian government valuable information that could be extracted after
identifying the intentional design flaw.
On
August 22, 2000, Sterling filed a complaint with the CIA’s Equal
Employment Office alleging employment-related racial discrimination.
Marred with a history of sexual and racial discrimination, the agency
ordered the African American Sterling to recruit three new spies
within two months even though many white case officers often go two
or three years without recruiting anyone. In March 2001, the CIA
placed Sterling on administrative leave.
On
May 24, 2001, the CIA’s Equal Employment Office denied Sterling’s
case. After Sterling filed a civil lawsuit against the CIA, the
agency officially terminated him on January 31, 2002. New York Times
reporter James Risen interviewed Sterling and published an article
regarding his termination from the CIA.
Concerned
about his involvement in the potential advancement of the Iranian
nuclear program, Sterling met with the Senate Select Intelligence
Committee (SSIC) in March 2003 to blow the whistle on a reckless CIA
program codenamed Operation Merlin. A month later, Risen prepared to
write an article exposing the mistakes made during Operation Merlin
when then-National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice convinced New
York Times senior officials to kill Risen’s story. Unable to
publish his article about Operation Merlin in The New York Times,
Risen began writing a book.
Published
in January 2006, Risen wrote “State of War: The Secret History of
the CIA and the Bush Administration” against the wishes of the CIA
and The New York Times. According to his book, a CIA official sent an
email to an Iranian agent in 2004 accidentally including data
exposing nearly every CIA asset in Iran. The Iranian spy who received
the data was a double agent who turned the information over to
Iranian security officials. Many CIA assets in Iran were arrested,
interrogated, and never seen again.
Determined
to prove Sterling had been Risen’s source for the book even though
much of the information addressed events that happened after his
termination from the CIA, the Justice Department began investigating
both Risen and Sterling. Risen was subpoenaed in 2008, but he fought
against it until the subpoena expired in 2009. The following year,
the Obama administration renewed the subpoena ordering Risen to break
his journalistic integrity and reveal his sources. Risen refused.
On
January 6, 2011, Sterling was arrested for illegally disclosing
national defense information and obstructing justice. According to
the indictment, Sterling had communicated with Risen and revealed
classified documents to the investigative journalist. Sterling was
also charged with obstruction for deleting an email that he had sent
to Risen.
In
July 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that Risen must testify in
Sterling’s trial. Less than a year later, the Supreme Court
rejected Risen’s appeal to protect his sources. In a vain attempt
to secure his stained legacy, Attorney General Eric Holder announced
last year that the Justice Department would not prosecute Risen for
refusing to reveal his sources.
After
a Kafkaesque trial involving anonymous CIA agents testifying behind
seven-foot-high gray partitions, Sterling was convicted on Monday of
six counts of unauthorized disclosure of national defense
information, and one count each of unlawful retention of national
defense information, unauthorized conveyance of government property,
and obstruction of justice. Although Sterling’s attorneys
demonstrated that at least 90 other CIA officials and numerous SSIC
staffers could have given the information to Risen, Sterling was
convicted without any evidence of recorded phone conversations or
captured email exchanges between him and the reporter.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.