Iran - Protests Decrease - Riots Increase - U.S. Prepares The Next Phase
2
January, 2018
The
riots and protests in Iran continue for a 6th day. While "western"
media claim that
the protests are growing I see no evidence for that in the various
videos that appear online. The legitimate protests over price rises,
failing private banks and against the new neoliberal
austerity budget of
President Rohani were
hijacked early
on by rioting gangs. These are obviously coordinated from the outside
of the country through various
internet applications, especially Telegram and Instagram:
Amad News, a channel on Telegram, appears to have played a pivotal role in the wave of protests. Reportedly administered by exiled journalist Rohollah Zam — a son of a senior Reformist cleric said to have escaped the country after being accused of having links with foreign intelligence agencies ...
Special software used to circumvent the government filters could still be downloaded easily. And on Monday, as on other days, there were calls for protests online and on foreign-based Persian-language satellite channels.
The
original protests over economic issues seem to have died down after
President Rouhani confirmed the right to protest, conceded economic
problems and promised to take them on. Indeed there are only few new
videos of genuine protest marches but an avalanche of videos of
rioting, arson and tussling with police forces. The size of the
protests are in a few hundred people or
less. Counter
demonstrations,
expressing loyalty for the republic (not noted in "western"
media), are bigger in size than the anti-government protests. Since
December 28 protests and riots have occurred in
a total of 66 cities by now, but only about 30 have been taking place
each night. This might point to some planning behind the events. A
daily switching of venues might be intended to prevent police
preparations.
The
groups of rioters are between 30 and 80 people in size with a some
bystanders milling around. They seem to follow a flash mob strategy
appearing here and there and to vanish again when police appears in
force. In some cities rioters attacked
police stations, military
posts and
were even stealing
firetrucks.
Some of the rioters are evidently trying to get their hands on
weapons.
Altogether
only a few thousand people, overwhelmingly male youth, seem to be
involved. Thousands protest in
Israel each week against the corruption of Prime Minister Netanyahoo.
On New-Years-Eve more
than 1,000 cars
in France were set alight by arsonists. None of this is front page
news but a few dozen riots in Iran get elevated to a "revolution".
The
total death toll of the "peaceful protests" is now some
21 of
which (by my count) at least five were policemen killed in attacks by
"protesters" and two unrelated civilians who were run
over and
killed by rioters driving a stolen firetruck. Six rioters were killed
when they tried to attack a police station in the town of Qahderijan.
The governor there claimed that the attackers were armed with guns.
The
same faking of pictures of large demonstrations and "evidence"
of government brutality that we have seen with regard to the war on
Syria is taking place with Iran. Videos of demonstrations from
Argentine and Bahrain are
used to claim large demonstrations in Iran. A
tweet with
the Bahrain video by a "journalist" who claimed it was in
Iran has received more than 17,000 re-tweets. Videos from
Spain or
even movie
scenes are
purported to show police violence in Iran. A video of a man lying on
his back and being cared for is once claimed to show that he has
been shot
by police while
at the same time another propagandists claims that
the man had a cardiac arrest after police used a taser on him. There
are no signs of wounds or other trauma. The dude probably just passed
out.
The
terrorist group MEK (NCRI, MKO) "leaked"
fake protocols of an alleged government meeting which it claims shows
panic over the protests. Allegedly the government fears the leader of
the MEK, Marjam Rajavi. The MEK has paid large sums to get support
from politicians, including
John McCain in
Washington and elsewhere. During the Iraq-Iran war it fought against
Iran on the side of Iraq. After the U.S. invaded Iraq the MEK was
held in special camps under U.S. control.
According to a 2012 Seymour
Hersh report the U.S.
military trained MEK fighters in
the U.S. in sabotage and insurgency technics. These people are deeply
hated in Iran but feared they are not. Their early engagement in the
"protests" via their website and propaganda
ops in Iran may
point to deeper role in the riots.
The
usual neoconservatives in the U.S. media are arguing for "more
help" for the "Iranian people". The help the want to
offer is designed to worsen their economic situation.
I earlier
argued that
the larger plan of the instigators of these riots is not aimed at
winning a violent "regime change" conflict, but at causing
a reaction by the Iranian government which can then be used to press
especially Europeans to again isolate Iran. This plan is now
confirmed by an op-ed in the Washington
Post.
Michael Singh of the Zionist lobby in Washington writes:
If the regime resorts to violence anyway, the international response should focus on diplomatic isolation. European and Asian states should reduce their diplomatic ties with Iran and downgrade Iran’s participation in international forums. Sanctions may also have a role ...
European leaders, who have been far more cautious, should speak up. ... On Sunday [President Rohani of Iran] recognized that the demonstrators had legitimate grievances and nominally accepted their right to protest. The Trump administration and other Western governments should aim to hold him to those words through diplomacy and the threat of sanctions in the event of more bloodshed.
The
rioting at the current level is in no way endangering the Iranian
republic. Should some rioters acquire weapons the intensity might
change a bit. But unless they receive material and personal support
from the outside, like it happened in Syria, the situation will soon
calm down. The people of Iran are against such violence and the
government has yet to use its manifold capabilities.
I
had documented in earlier posts that
the Trump administration, in tight co-operations with Israel, long
prepared for an intensification of a conflict with Iran. Half a year
ago the CIA set up a special office with a high level Iran hawk
leading the charge. Last month Trump namedanother
Iran hawk to lead the State Department Middle East section.
Since
the Iranian people successfully achieved "regime change" in
1979 the U.S. and Britain have had an adversarial policy against
Iran. It has ebbed and flowed in intensity but never changed. Under
Trump we will see a rapid increase of hostile actions. The
administration just called for
a UN emergency session about the situation. That is a laughable move
when one considers the size of daily murder the U.S. and its allies
commit in Yemen, Syria and Palestine. But the operation that unfolds
now is likely just a small part of a larger anti-Iran strategy that
has yet to become visible.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.